Literature DB >> 35414123

Summary of neonatal and maternal transport and reimbursement policies-a 5-year update.

Carla L DeSisto1, Ekwutosi M Okoroh2, Charlan D Kroelinger2, Wanda D Barfield2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the number of states with neonatal and maternal transport and reimbursement policies in 2019, compared with 2014. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of web-based, publicly available information on neonatal and maternal transport policies for each state in 2019. Information was abstracted from rules, codes, licensure regulations, and planning and program documents, then summarized within two categories: transport and reimbursement policies. RESULT: In 2019, 42 states had a policy for neonatal transport and 37 states had a policy for maternal transport, increasing by 8 and 7 states respectively. Further, 31 states had a reimbursement policy for neonatal transport and 11 states for maternal transport, increases of 1 state per category. Overall, the number of states with policies increased from 2014 to 2019.
CONCLUSION: The number of state neonatal and maternal transport policies increased; these policies may support provision of care at the most risk-appropriate facilities.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35414123     DOI: 10.1038/s41372-022-01389-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   3.225


  29 in total

1.  Deregionalization of neonatal intensive care in urban areas.

Authors:  Embry M Howell; Douglas Richardson; Paul Ginsburg; Barbara Foot
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Marie Lasswell; Wanda Denise Barfield; Roger William Rochat; Lillian Blackmon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Effect of opening midlevel neonatal intensive care units on the location of low birth weight births in California.

Authors:  Corinna A Haberland; Ciaran S Phibbs; Laurence C Baker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  The impact of certificate of need programs on neonatal intensive care units.

Authors:  S A Lorch; P Maheshwari; O Even-Shoshan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Consequences of the affordable care act for sick newborns.

Authors:  Jochen Profit; Paul H Wise; Henry C Lee
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Perinatal care: the threat of deregionalization.

Authors:  D Gagnon; S Allison-Cooke; R M Schwartz
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.132

7.  State certificate-of-need programs: the current status.

Authors:  J B Simpson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Why so little progress in regionalization of perinatal care when transport of high-risk neonates remains a substantial risk?

Authors:  Matthew J Bizzarro; Patrick G Gallagher
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 9.  United States and territory policies supporting maternal and neonatal transfer: review of transport and reimbursement.

Authors:  E M Okoroh; C D Kroelinger; S M Lasswell; D A Goodman; A M Williams; W D Barfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Characteristics of neonatal transports in California.

Authors:  V P Akula; J B Gould; P Kan; L Bollman; J Profit; H C Lee
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.