| Literature DB >> 35412903 |
Andrew S Cohen1, Andrew Du2, John Rowan3, Chad L Yost4, Anne L Billingsley1, Christopher J Campisano5, Erik T Brown6,7, Alan L Deino8, Craig S Feibel9, Katharine Grant10, John D Kingston11, Rachel L Lupien12, Veronica Muiruri13, R Bernhart Owen14, Kaye E Reed5, James Russell15, Mona Stockhecke6.
Abstract
Understanding the climatic drivers of environmental variability (EV) during the Plio-Pleistocene and EV’s influence on mammalian macroevolution are two outstanding foci of research in African paleoclimatology and evolutionary biology. The potential effects of EV are especially relevant for testing the variability selection hypothesis, which predicts a positive relationship between EV and speciation and extinction rates in fossil mammals. Addressing these questions is stymied, however, by 1) a lack of multiple comparable EV records of sufficient temporal resolution and duration, and 2) the incompleteness of the mammalian fossil record. Here, we first compile a composite history of Pan-African EV spanning the Plio-Pleistocene, which allows us to explore which climatic variables influenced EV. We find that EV exhibits 1) a long-term trend of increasing variability since ∼3.7 Ma, coincident with rising variability in global ice volume and sea surface temperatures around Africa, and 2) a 400-ky frequency correlated with seasonal insolation variability. We then estimate speciation and extinction rates for fossil mammals from eastern Africa using a method that accounts for sampling variation. We find no statistically significant relationship between EV and estimated speciation or extinction rates across multiple spatial scales. These findings are inconsistent with the variability selection hypothesis as applied to macroevolutionary processes.Entities:
Keywords: Africa; Plio-Pleistocene; mammalian evolution; paleoclimate; variability selection
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35412903 PMCID: PMC9169865 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2107393119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 12.779
Fig. 1.Paleoenvironmental data sources and types. Circles indicate locations where records (core or outcrop) were collected. Color codes indicate the type of record. Data sources and further information on specific sites and records are given in Dataset S1 and . Site key: 1) ODP658; 2) ODP659; 3) GIK16415-2; 4) GIK16776-1; 5) ODP662; 6) GIK16867; 7) ODP1082; 8) MD-96–2048; 9) MAL-1B/1C; 10) MAG-2A; 11) BTB-1A; 12) WTK-1A; 13) Omo R./Lake Turkana Region (Ethiopia/Kenya); 14) Afar Region (Ethiopia); 15) DSDP231; 16) ODP721/722; 17) ODP967.
Fig. 2.Interquartile ranges of z-scores (“variability”) for all records using 100-ky bins. (A) Mean (dark purple) variabilities for all terrestrially derived sites (no SSTs; median in light purple) plus upper and lower 95% confidence intervals (1,000 bootstraps). (B) Mean variabilities for eastern Africa + Indian Ocean + eastern Mediterranean (EAIM) records (no SSTs). (C) Same as B but for all Pan-African records whose records were not directly astronomically tuned and also excluding SSTs. (D) Same as B but for Western African records. (E) Variabilities of z-scores for the benthic foraminiferan δ18Ob records. (F) Same as B but for Pan-African tropical sea surface temperatures. (G) Same as E but for mean daily insolation at equator.
Fig. 3.(A) Wavelet analysis (equal and continuous bin spacing, Morlet wavelet) of 20-ky bin stacked IQR (variability) time series for all Pan-African records shown in Fig. 1 and Dataset S1 except SSTs for the period 3.21 to 0 Ma (the interval for which the number of available EAIM 20-ky bin records is consistently >6). (B) Same as A but removing records for which the dataset itself was directly astronomically tuned. (C) Same as A but only EAIM data. (D) Wavelet analysis for 20-ky bin variability in mean daily insolation at 0°N, calculated in 1-ky time steps for comparison with other panels. Cones of influence and P = 0.05 significance level indicated by black lines.
Fig. 4.Comparison of environmental variability records with time-dependent large mammalian turnover probabilities, estimated using a capture–mark–recapture model (Pradel’s seniority model; see ). All plots use 250-ky time bins (alternating white and lilac vertical bars) and include estimates with their 95% confidence intervals (except variability from the Turkana Basin δ13C paleosol carbonate record). (A) EAIM stacked IQRs of z-scores (environmental variability). (B) Speciation and extinction probabilities for eastern African mammals. (C) Eastern African hominin fossil record. Au, Australopithecus; H., Homo; K., Kenyanthropus; P., Paranthropus. For the Au. anamensis–afarensis lineage range, the hard edge represents the last appearance date, and whisker denotes the 95% confidence interval (51). Confidence intervals on speciation and extinction dates have not been estimated for other hominin taxa. (D) Speciation and extinction probabilities for Turkana Basin mammals only, compared with environmental variability from Turkana Basin paleosol isotopes. All estimated speciation/extinction probabilities use the lumped “cf.” taxonomic treatment. See text for further discussion.