Literature DB >> 35412367

Deep Learning Prediction of Ovarian Malignancy at US Compared with O-RADS and Expert Assessment.

Hui Chen1, Bo-Wen Yang1, Le Qian1, Yi-Shuang Meng1, Xiang-Hui Bai1, Xiao-Wei Hong1, Xin He1, Mei-Jiao Jiang1, Fei Yuan1, Qin-Wen Du1, Wei-Wei Feng1.   

Abstract

Background Deep learning (DL) algorithms could improve the classification of ovarian tumors assessed with multimodal US. Purpose To develop DL algorithms for the automated classification of benign versus malignant ovarian tumors assessed with US and to compare algorithm performance to Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and subjective expert assessment for malignancy. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive women with ovarian tumors undergoing gray scale and color Doppler US from January 2019 to November 2019. Histopathologic analysis was the reference standard. The data set was divided into training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) sets. Algorithms modified from residual network (ResNet) with two fusion strategies (feature fusion [hereafter, DLfeature] or decision fusion [hereafter, DLdecision]) were developed. DL prediction of malignancy was compared with O-RADS risk categorization and expert assessment by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis in the test set. Results A total of 422 women (mean age, 46.4 years ± 14.8 [SD]) with 304 benign and 118 malignant tumors were included; there were 337 women in the training and validation data set and 85 women in the test data set. DLfeature had an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.97) for classifying malignant from benign ovarian tumors, comparable with O-RADS (AUC, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.97; P = .88) and expert assessment (AUC, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.91, 0.99; P = .07), and similar to DLdecision (AUC, 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.96; P = .29). DLdecision, DLfeature, O-RADS, and expert assessment achieved sensitivities of 92%, 92%, 92%, and 96%, respectively, and specificities of 80%, 85%, 89%, and 87%, respectively, for malignancy. Conclusion Deep learning algorithms developed by using multimodal US images may distinguish malignant from benign ovarian tumors with diagnostic performance comparable to expert subjective and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System assessment. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35412367     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  2 in total

1.  Ovarian tumor diagnosis using deep convolutional neural networks and a denoising convolutional autoencoder.

Authors:  Yuyeon Jung; Taewan Kim; Seungchul Lee; Youn Jin Choi; Mi-Ryung Han; Sejin Kim; Geunyoung Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  He-Li Xu; Ting-Ting Gong; Fang-Hua Liu; Hong-Yu Chen; Qian Xiao; Yang Hou; Ying Huang; Hong-Zan Sun; Yu Shi; Song Gao; Yan Lou; Qing Chang; Yu-Hong Zhao; Qing-Lei Gao; Qi-Jun Wu
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-09-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.