Literature DB >> 35412209

Comment on "Surgery for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Preoperative Factors Tipping the Scale of Decision-Making".

Zhenlu Li1, Mao Li1, Weiming Hu1, Huimin Lu2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35412209      PMCID: PMC9174129          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11774-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, We read with interest the article “Surgery for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN) of the Pancreas: Preoperative Factors Tipping the Scale of Decision-Making” by Marchegiani et al.[1] We would like to congratulate the authors for their innovative work to develop a preoperative, disease-specific tool for patients undergoing surgery for IPMN. However, we need to express some of our opinions. First, Table 3 shows postoperative outcomes with two groups distributed by type of surgery (pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), distal pancreatectomy (DP), and total pancreatectomy (TP)) and by final pathology (low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia/invasive (HGD/inv) cancer) but provided only one P value, which was confusing. We speculated about the P values in Table 3 for comparison between LGD and HGD/inv, whereas there were no P values for comparison among the three different surgical treatment groups. Were intergroup comparisons for postoperative outcomes among the three types of surgery (TP versus DP, TP versus PD, and PD versus DP) necessary for further decision tree analysis.[2] Second, the authors integrated PD and TP into one group and concluded the same risk factors for severe surgical complications and a classification tree model for PD/TP, which might not be appropriate. Because the major morbidity after TP was lower than that after PD (19.8% versus 23.5%), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (0% versus 15.2%) and postoperative mortality (0% versus 4.5%) were notably lower. In addition, consideration of recurrence and long-term survival after surgery for IPMN, TP, and PD might have different operation indications.[2,3] Therefore, we think the authors should respectively provide predictors of severe surgical complications and a classification tree for PD and TP. Overall, we thank the authors for their valuable work on developing a preoperative, disease-specific tool to predict surgical morbidity for IPMNs. In addition, to make personalized clinical decisions for surgical candidates and surgical types, preoperative risk evaluation of postoperative recurrence and long-term survival for IPMN are needed in the future.
  3 in total

1.  Long-Term Quality of Life after Pancreatic Surgery for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm.

Authors:  Helwig Valentin Wundsam; Christiane Sophie Rösch; Patrick Kirchweger; Ines Fischer; Michael Weitzendorfer; Holger Rumpold; Reinhold Függer
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 1.745

2.  Prognostic impact of conservative surgery for pancreatic IPMNs.

Authors:  Matteo Palmeri; Gregorio Di Franco; Matteo Bianchini; Simone Guadagni; Desirée Gianardi; Niccolò Furbetta; Giovanni Caprili; Lorenzo Maria Fatucchi; Andrea Sbrana; Niccola Funel; Luca Emanuele Pollina; Giulio Di Candio; Luca Morelli
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.279

3.  Surgery for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Preoperative Factors Tipping the Scale of Decision-Making.

Authors:  Giovanni Marchegiani; Stefano Crippa; Giampaolo Perri; Massimo Falconi; Roberto Salvia; Paola M V Rancoita; Andrea Caravati; Giulio Belfiori; Tommaso Dall'Olio; Francesca Aleotti; Stefano Partelli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 5.344

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.