Literature DB >> 35412198

Validation of reliable safe harbor locus for efficient porcine transgenesis.

Xiang Ma1, Weijun Zeng2, Lei Wang2, Rui Cheng2, Zeying Zhao2, Caiyun Huang2, Zhongxin Sun2, Peipei Tao2, Tao Wang2, Jufang Zhang3, Lu Liu4, Xing Duan5, Dong Niu6.   

Abstract

Transgenic technology is now widely used in biomedical and agricultural fields. Transgenesis is commonly achieved through random integration which might cause some uncertain consequences. The site-specific integration could avoid this disadvantage. This study aimed to screen and validate the best safe harbor (SH) locus for efficient porcine transgenesis. First, the cells carrying the EGFP reporter construct at four different SH loci (ROSA26, AAVS1, H11 and COL1A1) were achieved through CRSIPR/Cas9-mediated HDR. At the COL1A1 and ROSA26 loci, a higher mRNA and protein expression of EGFP was detected, and it was correlated with a lower level of DNA methylation of the EGFP promoter, hEF1α. A decreased H3K27me3 modification of the hEF1α promoter at the COL1A1 locus was also detected. For the safety of transgenesis at different SH locus, we found that transgenesis could relatively alter the expression of the adjacent endogenous genes, but the influence was limited. We also did not observe any off-target cleavage for the selected sgRNAs of the COL1A1 and ROSA26 loci. In conclusion, the COL1A1 and ROSA26 were confirmed to be the best two SH loci with the COL1A1 being more competitive for porcine transgenesis. This work would greatly facilitate porcine genome engineering and transgenic pig production.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR; Epigenetic regulation; Pig; Safe harbor sites; Transgenesis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35412198     DOI: 10.1007/s10142-022-00859-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics        ISSN: 1438-793X            Impact factor:   3.674


  32 in total

Review 1.  Methylation-induced repression--belts, braces, and chromatin.

Authors:  A P Bird; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-11-24       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Altering the genome by homologous recombination.

Authors:  M R Capecchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genetic mosaic dissection of Lis1 and Ndel1 in neuronal migration.

Authors:  Simon Hippenmeyer; Yong Ha Youn; Hyang Mi Moon; Kazunari Miyamichi; Hui Zong; Anthony Wynshaw-Boris; Liqun Luo
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice.

Authors:  G Friedrich; P Soriano
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.

Authors:  Martin Jinek; Krzysztof Chylinski; Ines Fonfara; Michael Hauer; Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems.

Authors:  Le Cong; F Ann Ran; David Cox; Shuailiang Lin; Robert Barretto; Naomi Habib; Patrick D Hsu; Xuebing Wu; Wenyan Jiang; Luciano A Marraffini; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases.

Authors:  Patrick D Hsu; David A Scott; Joshua A Weinstein; F Ann Ran; Silvana Konermann; Vineeta Agarwala; Yinqing Li; Eli J Fine; Xuebing Wu; Ophir Shalem; Thomas J Cradick; Luciano A Marraffini; Gang Bao; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 8.  The mononuclear phagocyte system of the pig as a model for understanding human innate immunity and disease.

Authors:  Lynsey Fairbairn; Ronan Kapetanovic; David P Sester; David A Hume
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.962

9.  Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  John G Doench; Nicolo Fusi; Meagan Sullender; Mudra Hegde; Emma W Vaimberg; Jennifer Listgarten; Katherine F Donovan; Ian Smith; Zuzana Tothova; Craig Wilen; Robert Orchard; Herbert W Virgin; David E Root
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  QUMA: quantification tool for methylation analysis.

Authors:  Yuichi Kumaki; Masaaki Oda; Masaki Okano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.