Literature DB >> 35412126

Does static stretching change uniformly the quadriceps elasticity in physically actives subjects?

Carolina Holz Nonnenmacher1, Iohana Nunes2, Bruno Monteiro de Moura3, Fernando Diefenthaeler3, Kelly Mônica Marinho E Lima4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Verify the acute responses of static stretching (SS) on the rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus lateralis (VL) elasticity and knee/hip range of motion (ROM). Additionally, to investigate if there are consistency among quadriceps muscle elasticity after SS.
METHODS: Acute effect of SS on pre-post-intervention design. Thirtheen healthy participants (both genders) proposed for a pre-post experimental design. RF, VM, and VL elasticity (strain ratio, SR) was evaluated bilaterally by ultrasound with quasi-static elastography. Higher SR values refer to more rigid tissues. A SS protocol of 3 series of 30 s was applied at right lower limb. The left lower limb was considered as control group. Also, photogrammetry evaluated the knee/hip ROM.
RESULTS: For SR muscle comparisons, VM was lower (less stiff) than VL and RF at pre- and post-SS. For time comparisons, no differences were observed for SR and ROM at pre- and post-SS. However, the effect size of the quadriceps SR at SS lower limb was higher than control.
CONCLUSION: Acute effects of SS did not change the quadriceps SR or knee/hip ROM in healthy and active subjects. Non-uniform quadriceps SR are observed (VM < VL and RF) independently of SS. Future studies should consider different protocols, muscles, and populations.
© 2022. Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elasticity imaging techniques; Photogrammetry; Range of motion; Ultrasonography

Year:  2022        PMID: 35412126     DOI: 10.1007/s40477-021-00649-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound        ISSN: 1876-7931


  4 in total

1.  Non-uniform Stiffness within Gastrocnemius-Achilles tendon Complex Observed after Static Stretching.

Authors:  Jiping Zhou; Chunlong Liu; Zhijie Zhang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?

Authors:  María J Blanca; Rafael Alarcón; Jaume Arnau; Roser Bono; Rebecca Bendayan
Journal:  Psicothema       Date:  2017-11

Review 3.  The validity and reliability of using ultrasound elastography to measure cutaneous stiffness, a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen M DeJong; Steven Abbott; Marilyn Zelesco; Brendan F Kennedy; Mel R Ziman; Fiona M Wood
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 4.  Mechanics of ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Guo-Yang Li; Yanping Cao
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.704

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.