Kerri L Coon1, Shivanand Hegde2, Grant L Hughes3. 1. Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. kerri.coon@wisc.edu. 2. Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Topical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. 3. Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Topical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. grant.hughes@lstmed.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mosquitoes harbor microbial communities that play important roles in their growth, survival, reproduction, and ability to transmit human pathogens. Microbiome transplantation approaches are often used to study host-microbe interactions and identify microbial taxa and assemblages associated with health or disease. However, no such approaches have been developed to manipulate the microbiota of mosquitoes. RESULTS: Here, we developed an approach to transfer entire microbial communities between mosquito cohorts. We undertook transfers between (Culex quinquefasciatus to Aedes aegypti) and within (Ae. aegypti to Ae. aegypti) species to validate the approach and determine the number of mosquitoes required to prepare donor microbiota. After the transfer, we monitored mosquito development and microbiota dynamics throughout the life cycle. Typical holometabolous lifestyle-related microbiota structures were observed, with higher dynamics of microbial structures in larval stages, including the larval water, and less diversity in adults. Microbiota diversity in recipient adults was also more similar to the microbiota diversity in donor adults. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence for successful microbiome transplantation in mosquitoes. Our results highlight the value of such methods for studying mosquito-microbe interactions and lay the foundation for future studies to elucidate the factors underlying microbiota acquisition, assembly, and function in mosquitoes under controlled conditions. Video Abstract.
BACKGROUND: Mosquitoes harbor microbial communities that play important roles in their growth, survival, reproduction, and ability to transmit human pathogens. Microbiome transplantation approaches are often used to study host-microbe interactions and identify microbial taxa and assemblages associated with health or disease. However, no such approaches have been developed to manipulate the microbiota of mosquitoes. RESULTS: Here, we developed an approach to transfer entire microbial communities between mosquito cohorts. We undertook transfers between (Culex quinquefasciatus to Aedes aegypti) and within (Ae. aegypti to Ae. aegypti) species to validate the approach and determine the number of mosquitoes required to prepare donor microbiota. After the transfer, we monitored mosquito development and microbiota dynamics throughout the life cycle. Typical holometabolous lifestyle-related microbiota structures were observed, with higher dynamics of microbial structures in larval stages, including the larval water, and less diversity in adults. Microbiota diversity in recipient adults was also more similar to the microbiota diversity in donor adults. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence for successful microbiome transplantation in mosquitoes. Our results highlight the value of such methods for studying mosquito-microbe interactions and lay the foundation for future studies to elucidate the factors underlying microbiota acquisition, assembly, and function in mosquitoes under controlled conditions. Video Abstract.
Authors: Kerri L Coon; Luca Valzania; David A McKinney; Kevin J Vogel; Mark R Brown; Michael R Strand Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel Pr Herlemann; Matthias Labrenz; Klaus Jürgens; Stefan Bertilsson; Joanna J Waniek; Anders F Andersson Journal: ISME J Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Thomas Walker; Shannon Quek; Claire L Jeffries; Janvier Bandibabone; Vishaal Dhokiya; Roland Bamou; Mojca Kristan; Louisa A Messenger; Alexandra Gidley; Emily A Hornett; Enyia R Anderson; Cintia Cansado-Utrilla; Shivanand Hegde; Chimanuka Bantuzeko; Jennifer C Stevenson; Neil F Lobo; Simon C Wagstaff; Christophe Antonio Nkondjio; Seth R Irish; Eva Heinz; Grant L Hughes Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Daniel McDonald; Morgan N Price; Julia Goodrich; Eric P Nawrocki; Todd Z DeSantis; Alexander Probst; Gary L Andersen; Rob Knight; Philip Hugenholtz Journal: ISME J Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Luca Valzania; Vincent G Martinson; Ruby E Harrison; Bret M Boyd; Kerri L Coon; Mark R Brown; Michael R Strand Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2018-07-06
Authors: Panpim Thongsripong; James Angus Chandler; Amy B Green; Pattamaporn Kittayapong; Bruce A Wilcox; Durrell D Kapan; Shannon N Bennett Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 2.912