| Literature DB >> 35410190 |
Zahra Maloum1, Mohammad Taheri2, Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard3, Zeinab Shirvani-Farsani4.
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been recently emerged as critical modulators of oxidative stress pathway. Likewise, rising evidence currently highlights dysfunction of oxidative stress pathways in bipolar disorder (BD) patients.In the current study, we evaluated the expression levels of H19, SCAL1 (LUCAT1), RMST, MEG3 and MT1DP lncRNAs in the PBMC from 50 patients with BD and 50 control subjects (male/female ratio in each group: 70%/30%). Expression levels of SCAL1, RMST and MEG3 but not H19 and MT1DP were considerably decreased in BD patients compared with healthy individuals. Such significant decrease in the expression of MEG3, RMST and SCAL1 was only reported in male BD patients compared with male controls. Substantial pairwise correlations were observed between expression levels of these lncRNAs in BD subjects. The area under curve values for RMST, MEG3 and SCAL1 were 0.70, 0.63 and 0.61 respectively. On the basis of this finding, RMST had the best efficiency in the discrimination of disease status between BD patients and controls. Taken together, the current results suggest a role for MEG3, RMST and SCAL1 lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of BD. In addition, peripheral expression levels of these lncRNAs might serve as potential peripheral markers for BD.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Bipolar; Brain; MEG3; RMST lncRNA; Stress oxidative
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35410190 PMCID: PMC9004165 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03899-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Psychiatry ISSN: 1471-244X Impact factor: 3.630
Primers used in RT-qPCR
| Gene | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer | Product Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5′-TGCTGCACTTTACAACCACTG-3′ | 5′-ATGGTGTCTTTGATGTTGGGC-3′ | 105 |
|
| 5′-TGGCATAGAGGAGGTGAT-3′ | 5′-GGAGTGCTGTTGGAGAATA-3′ | 111 |
|
| 5′-CAGGATGGCAGTGGGTGA-3′ | 5′-GTCCCTTGTGATCTCTGTGAC-3′ | 137 |
|
| 5′-CCCAATGAAAAGGAACAAAACC-3’ | 5′-ATTTGTGAGGGGATGAGAATAC-3’ | 217 |
|
| 5′-CAAGAAGAACTGCTGCTCCT-3’ | 5′-TTGTAGGGGTTGCGTTATTTAC-3’ | 147 |
|
| 5′-CCATGAGAAGTATGACAAC-3’ | 5′-GAGTCCTTCCACGATACC-3’ | 105 |
Demographic and clinical features of BD patients and controls
| Cases | Controls | |
|---|---|---|
| Number | 50 | 50 |
| Sex | ||
| Male (%) | 70 | 70 |
| Female (%) | 30 | 30 |
| Mean age (range) | 36 (17–56) | 34 (14–52) |
| Disease duration (range) | 4 (1–14) | – |
| Onset age (range) | 32 (15–48) | – |
Fig. 1Expression analysis of lncRNAs in the PBMCs. Relative expression (Fold change) of MEG3 (A), RMST (B), and SCAL1 (C). The expression of lncRNAs was down-regulated in BD patients compared with controls. Expression levels of lncRNAs in each sample were normalized to GAPDH expression. The relative expression of lncRNAs was obtained using the formula 2 -ΔΔCt and t-test
Relative expression of lncRNAs in BD patients and healthy controls
| lncRNAs | Parameters | Total patients ( | Male patients ( | Female patients ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1/Fold change | 4.76 | 7.69 | 3.33 |
|
|
|
| 0.35 | |
|
| 1/Fold change | 5.50 | 6.25 | 12.50 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1/Fold change | 4.34 | 5.00 | 4 |
|
|
|
| 0.36 | |
|
| 1/Fold change | 1.08 | 1.33 | 1.31 |
|
| 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.75 | |
|
| 1/Fold change | 1.12 | 1.16 | 1.31 |
|
| 0.83 | 0.95 | 0.94 |
Pairwise correlation between expression levels of lncRNAs in cases group
| Correlation |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
Appraisal of correlation between expression levels of lncRNAs and clinical data (R is the correlation coefficient or the Pearson’s correlation which measures the closeness of association of the points in the scatter plots to the linear regression line)
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R |
| R |
| R |
| R |
| R |
| |
| Patient Age | 0.087 | 0.551 | 0.148 | 0.309 | 0.215 | 0.136 | 0.097 | 0.504 | 0.041 | 0.776 |
| Age at onset | 0.200 | 0.166 | 0.111 | 0.447 | 0.191 | 0.188 | 0.156 | 0.284 | 0.142 | 0.330 |
| Disease duration | 0.160 | 0.270 | 0.204 | 0.158 | 0.277 | 0.053 | 0.190 | 0.189 | 0.180 | 0.215 |
Fig. 2ROC curve analysis of RMST (A), MEG3, (B) and SCAL1 (C). AUC: area under curve
Fig. 3ROC curve for combination of expression levels of RMST, MEG3, and SCAL1