| Literature DB >> 35410103 |
Ioannis N Anastopoulos1,2, Chloe K Herczeg2, Kasey N Davis2, Atray C Dixit2.
Abstract
In the original publication [...].Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35410103 PMCID: PMC8998796 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 4Performance comparisons on the FAERS dataset. (A) Predictive utility of various features and model architectures for predicting adverse events in the FAERS dataset. X-axis labels correspond to adverse event categories for a particular case. Y-axis is the AUC at predicting each of the labels. Colors correspond to various feature subsets tested. Error bars correspond to 95% confidence interval derived from bootstrapping on 5-fold cross-validation (each fold contains 28,682 records). (B) Power analysis demonstrating improvement in performance as a function of the number of patient records examined. Blue corresponds to hospitalization model performance and orange corresponds to performance of model predicting death. X-axis is log10 (number of records) Y-axis is AUC. Shaded error region corresponds to 95% confidence interval derived from bootstrapping on 5-fold cross-validation in a subsampled dataset corresponding to the X-axis location. (C) Plot demonstrating relationship between model error across all outcomes and age, (D) average molecular weight of drugs patient is taking, and (E) patient sex.