| Literature DB >> 35409773 |
Xiaonuo Chen1, Xiaojun Wang2, Yuying Li1, Yinlei Yao1, Yun Zhang1, Yeqing Jiang1, Xiaohui Lei3, Han Liu1, Naicheng Wu1,4, Nicola Fohrer1,4.
Abstract
The Middle Route Project of the South-to-North Water Diversion is an artificially independent system that does not connect to other surface waters. Excessive periphyton proliferation causes a series of environmental problems in the canal. In this study, the periphyton community and environmental factors on the left and right banks of the canal in the algal growing area were investigated and sampled six times (June, September, and November of 2019 and 2020). The succession pattern of the attached organism community in the artificial canal was analyzed, and the key factors affecting the algal community were analyzed using RDA and GAM. The results showed that the seasonal variability of the environmental factors was more significant than the spatial variability. A total of 114 taxa of periphytic algae were found, belonging to seven phyla and 69 genera, and mainly composed of Bacillariophyta. Species richness was ranked as Bacillariophyta (60 taxa), Chlorophyta (31 taxa) and Cyanobacteria (15 taxa), and higher in autumn than in summer. The dominant taxa were Cymbella sp., Fragilaria sp., Navicula sp. and Diatoma sp. The abundance of periphytic algal varied from 0.07 × 105 to 8.99 × 105 ind./cm2, with trends similar to that of species richness. The redundancy analysis and generalized additive model showed that water temperature and nutrient concentration were the key factors influencing the structure of the algal community, followed by discharge rate and velocity, which were the determinants of the spatial and temporal patterns of the algal community. In view of the influence of discharge and velocity on the structure of algal communities, it is suggested that ecological scheduling could be used to regulate the structure of the algal community on the canal wall in the operation of later water division projects to ensure the safety of water division.Entities:
Keywords: GAM; community structure; environmental factors; periphytic algae
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35409773 PMCID: PMC8998273 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Distribution of sampling sites along the canal of the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD, China.
Figure 2Hydrological changes in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD: (a) Depth; (b) Flow velocity and discharge.
Figure 3PCA of water environmental factors in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD. (1 represents the left bank of the canal and 2 represents the right bank of the canal, 3 represents the bend section of the canal).
Physicochemical parameters analyzed in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD in different sampling periods.
| Parameters | June | September | November |
|---|---|---|---|
| WT (°C) | 20.32 ± 3.11a | 27.35 ± 0.4b | 19.38 ± 0.57a |
| pH | 8.68 ± 0.12a | 8.88 ± 0.29b | 8.84 ± 0.15ab |
| DO (mg/L) | 9.47 ± 1.01b | 6.43 ± 1.38a | 9.33 ± 1.83b |
| Cond (μS/cm) | 262.21 ± 9.3b | 258.08 ± 2.56b | 224.97 ± 3.33a |
| ORP (mV) | 203.65 ± 75.64c | 58.87 ± 33.92a | 143.62 ± 72.63b |
| Tur (NTU) | 7.64 ± 6.16 | 4.8 ± 3.62 | 4.94 ± 3.99 |
| NO3−-N (mg/L) | 0.05 ± 0.02a | 0.07 ± 0.05a | 0.14 ± 0.1b |
| NH4+-N (mg/L) | 0.71 ± 0.13 | 0.69 ± 0.09 | 0.69 ± 0.24 |
| TN (mg/L) | 1.14 ± 0.2a | 1.69 ± 0.63b | 1.51 ± 0.37ab |
| TP (mg/L) | 0.022 ± 0.008b | 0.012 ± 0.003a | 0.011 ± 0.004a |
| CODMn (mg/L) | 2.18 ± 0.26a | 3.16 ± 0.73b | 2.44 ± 0.33a |
Note: Values were shown as arithmetic means ± standard deviations. Different lowercase letters represented significant differences by ANOVA at p < 0.05. Means with the same letter were not significantly different.
Figure 4Evolutionary tree of species of algae in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD.
Figure 5Spatial and temporal variation in species richness of periphytic algae by phyla in the sampling sites of MRP of SNWD: (a) Temporal variation in percentage composition of species richness during the sampling periods; (b) Temporal variation in total species richness during the sampling periods.
Figure 6Temporal variation in abundance of algae in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD.
Dominant species and dominant degree of periphytic algae in Henan section of MRP of SNWD.
| Phylum | Dominant Species | Abbreviation | June | September | November |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyanobacteria | Ana sp. | 0.333 | — | — | |
|
| Dcir | 0.088 | — | — | |
| Chr sp. | — | 0.026 | — | ||
|
| Mpun | 0.049 | — | — | |
| Mir sp. | — | 0.034 | — | ||
| Osc sp. | 0.052 | — | 0.034 | ||
| Pse sp. | — | — | 0.025 | ||
| Chlorophyta | Sce sp. | 0.237 | 0.073 | 0.075 | |
| Bacillariophyta | Ach sp. | — | 0.032 | — | |
| Cyc sp. | 0.336 | 0.077 | 0.107 | ||
| Cym sp. | 0.373 | 0.175 | 0.307 | ||
| C. | Casp | 0.677 | 0.904 | 0.546 | |
| Dia sp. | 0.5 | — | 0.18 | ||
| D. | Dvul | 0.167 | 0.026 | — | |
| Dip sp. | — | 0.022 | — | ||
| Enc sp. | — | 0.374 | — | ||
| Eun sp. | 0.022 | — | — | ||
| Fra sp. | 0.18 | 0.087 | 0.14 | ||
| Gom sp. | 0.026 | — | — | ||
| G. | Ggra | — | 0.024 | — | |
|
| Agra | 0.166 | 0.024 | 0.169 | |
| Nav sp. | 0.349 | 0.274 | 0.287 | ||
| Sta sp. | — | 0.025 | — | ||
| Sur sp. | — | 0.02 | — | ||
| Syn sp. | 0.06 | — | 0.027 | ||
|
| Uuln | — | 0.059 | 0.1 | |
| Euglenophyta | Eug sp. | 0.073 | — | — |
Note: —indicates dominance <0.02. Numbers indicates the dominance index.
Figure 7RDA ordination of algae community and environmental factors in Henan section of MRP of SNWD: (a) Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and Euglenophyta; (b) Bacillariophyta.
Figure 8Heatmap of correlation between dominant species of periphytic algae and environmental variables: (a) Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and Euglenophyta; (b) Bacillariophyta.
Fitting results of GAM between algal biomass and environmental factors in the MRP of SNWD.
| Parameters | df | Ref.df | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.778 | 0.388 |
| DO | 1.000 | 1.000 | 11.059 | 0.003 ** |
| Cond | 2.867 | 2.982 | 18.216 | 0.000 *** |
| Tur | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.336 | 0.261 |
| TN | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.124 | 0.728 |
| TP | 2.541 | 2.824 | 16.143 | 0.000 *** |
| pH | 1.000 | 1.000 | 2.435 | 0.134 |
| ORP | 2.974 | 2.999 | 14.152 | 0.000 *** |
| NH4+-N | 1.000 | 1.000 | 14.912 | 0.001 *** |
| NO3−-N | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.83 | 0.373 |
| CODMn | 2.629 | 2.893 | 4.287 | 0.025 * |
Note: * indicated variable significant at 0.05 level, ** indicated variable significant at 0.01 level, and *** indicated variable significant at 0.001 level.
Figure 9Illustration of the GAM for the effect of environmental factors on the biomass of the periphytic algae. (a) WT; (b) DO; (c) Comd; (d) Tur; (e) TN; (f) TP; (g) pH; (h) ORP; (i) NH4+-N; (j) NO3−-N; (k) CODMn.