| Literature DB >> 35409552 |
Jianfeng Wu1, Lingyan Zhang2, Hongchun Yang1, Chunfu Lu1, Lu Jiang2, Yuyun Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the effect of music tempo on runners' perception of fatigue at different exercise intensities and while listening to music of different tempos through running experiments.Entities:
Keywords: exercise intensity; fatigue perception; heart rate; median frequency; music tempo; running; surface electromyographic signals
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35409552 PMCID: PMC8997730 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19073869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Basic information of the subjects (M ± SD).
| Number of Subjects | Age (Years) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | Resting Heart Rate (Beats/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 23.95 ± 1.49 | 173.78 ± 1.54 | 64.39 ± 4.55 | 78.97 ± 8.15 |
Details of music selection.
| Music Tempo | Tracks | Duration/min | Beat/bpm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slow music | Falcom Sound Team Jdk | 4′23″ | 90 |
| Grass Harvest | 3′14″ | 96 | |
| The des Alizes | 3′40″ | 100 | |
| Harunouta | 3′03″ | 90 | |
| Sakurairo Contrail | 2′28″ | 90 | |
| Springtime Affair | 2′49″ | 95 | |
| Regrettably, You Know | 2′04″ | 96 | |
| A Tiny Sunshine | 1′57″ | 99 | |
| Sakura Residential Area | 2′05″ | 97 | |
| Fast music | Cigarette Daydreams | 3′12″ | 150 |
| Hero | 3′34″ | 150 | |
| Shanghai Alice Magic Orchestra | 3′36″ | 152 | |
| Toy War | 1′55″ | 160 | |
| Where to Jun | 3′57″ | 160 | |
| Dream Land Days | 3′17″ | 155 |
Borg’s scale for rating of perceived exertion.
| Score | Subjective Exercise Intensity | Subjective Exercise Fatigue | Score | Subjective Exercise Intensity | Subjective Exercise Fatigue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | No exertion at all | Not hard at all | 14 | - | |
| 7 | Extremely light | Extremely relaxed | 15 | Hard (heavy) | Tired |
| 8 | - 1 | 16 | - | ||
| 9 | Very light | Very relaxed | 17 | Very hard | Very tired |
| 10 | - | 18 | - | ||
| 11 | Light | Relaxed | 19 | Extremely hard | Extremely tired |
| 12 | - | 20 | Maximal exertion | Trying one’s best | |
| 13 | Somewhat hard | A little tired |
1-represents the fatigue status between the two levels.
Figure 1Muscle and electrode location. (a) Shows the electrode positions for the RF, (b) shows the electrode positions for the VM.
Figure 2Experiment flow chart.
Figure 3(a) The electrode position for the target muscles and the actual situation of wearing and using the instrument; (b) the setup for measuring sEMG signals when loading and stretching the knee; and (c) the running experimental procedure.
Examination of the effects of music tempo and exercise intensity.
| Parameter | High | Low | Music Tempo | Exercise | Music Tempo | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fast | Slow | None | Fast | Slow | None | η2 | η2 | η2 | ||||
| TFP (min) | 7.18 ± 2.36 | 6.23 ± 2.44 | 5.40 ± 1.94 | 12.68 ± 6.46 | 10.79 ± 4.86 | 9.06 ± 4.36 | 0.000 | 0.632 | 0.000 | 0.540 | 0.031 | 0.207 |
| HR | 69.56 ± 10.66 | 67.39 ± 11.14 | 71.11 ± 10.18 | 57.89 ± 10.30 | 61.83 ± 10.81 | 62.06 ± 8.95 | 0.077 | 0.140 | 0.000 | 0.796 | 0.075 | 0.141 |
| MFRF
| −0.64 ± 4.98 | −2.02 ± 2.95 | 0.53 ± 4.45 | −0.86 ± 6.34 | −0.42 ± 6.81 | −0.96 ± 5.11 | 0.672 | 0.023 | 0.967 | 0.000 | 0.210 | 0.088 |
| MFVM
| −0.75 ± 5.91 | −0.89 ± 3.81 | 1.01 ± 4.2 | 0.38 ± 3.81 | −1.08 ± 5.6 | −0.79 ± 4.41 | 0.609 | 0.029 | 0.670 | 0.011 | 0.323 | 0.064 |
1 HR difference value is post-run HR−resting HR. 2 MF difference is MF before running−MF after running. RF: rectus femoris. VM: vastus medialis.
Figure 4Time to fatigue perception for different experimental conditions.
Post hoc test of TFP under different experimental conditions.
| Exercise Intensity | Pairwise Comparisons | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No Music vs. | Slow Music vs. | Fast Music vs. | |
| Low intensity | Slow music: | No music: | No music: |
| Fast music: | Fast music: | Slow music: | |
| High intensity | Slow music: | No music: | No music: |
| Fast music: | Fast music: | Slow music: | |
Figure 5Differences in HR before and after running under different experimental conditions.
Figure 6(a) MF differences of rectus femoris before and after running under different experimental conditions; (b) MF differences of vastus medialis before and after running under different experimental conditions.