| Literature DB >> 35408517 |
Xue-Li Liu1,2, Yi-Fan Chen1, Jing-Jing Yang1, Si-Jin Li1, Hua-Le Xie1, Tian-Lin Ma1.
Abstract
A new type of hydroxyalkyl starch, γ-hydroxypropyl starch (γ-HPS), was prepared by etherification of alkali-activated starch with 3-chloropropanol. The reaction efficiency, morphological change, thermodynamic and apparent viscosity properties, and other physicochemical characteristics were described. The molar substitution (MS) of modified whole starch was determined to be 0.008, 0.017, 0.053, 0.106, and 0.178, with a ratio of 5%, 15%, 25%, 35%, and 45% 3-chloropropanol to starch (v/w), respectively. Compared to native starch, the granular size and shape and the X-ray diffraction pattern of γ-HPS are not very different. For low-substituted γ-HPS, the implications may be less evident. Thermal stability measurements by means of thermogravimetric analyses and differential scanning calorimetry (TGA-DSC) proved that thermal stability was reduced and water retaining capacity was increased after hydroxypropylation. Furthermore, the findings also showed that the solubility, light transmittance, and retrogradation of γ-HPS pastes could be improved by etherification. The greater the MS of the γ-HPS, the more its freeze-thaw stability and acid resistivity increased. In this study, we provide relevant information for the application of γ-HPS in food and non-food industries.Entities:
Keywords: molar substitution; physicochemical properties; γ-hydroxypropyl starch
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35408517 PMCID: PMC9000244 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27072119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effect of etherified reagent on molar substitution of hydroxypropylated starches. (Histogram is theoretical MS, trendline is experimental MS).
Figure 2X-ray diffraction patterns of native and hydroxypropylated starches.
Figure 3Scanning electron micrographs (2000×, bar as 10 μm) of native starch (A) and γ-HPS at MS = 0.008 (B), MS = 0.017 (C), MS = 0.053 (D), MS = 0.106 (E), and MS = 0.178 (F).
Figure 4Solubility of native starch and γ-HPS at different temperatures and ratios of MS.
Figure 5Syneresis (%) during freeze–thaw cycles for native and γ-HPS pastes.
Retrogradation of native starch and γ-HPS.
| Time/Sample 1 | Native | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 h | 3.6% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 h | 12.5% | 2.2% | 1.3% | - | - | - |
| 24 h | 25.2% | 9.8% | 5.1% | 3.3% | - | - |
| 36 h | 36.1% | 21.5% | 13% | 7.6% | 4.6% | - |
| 48 h | 53.2% | 32.4% | 24.6% | 23.8% | 18.6% | 5.6% |
| 72 h | 59.5% | 43.2% | 36.8% | 27.6% | 25.2% | 10.7% |
1 Unless otherwise stated, A–E: γ-HPS with MS 0.008, 0.017, 0.053, 0.106 and 0.178, respectively.
Figure 6Effect of MS and pH on peak viscosity of native and γ-HPS.