| Literature DB >> 35408098 |
Pablo Palacios Játiva1,2, Cesar A Azurdia-Meza1, Iván Sánchez3, David Zabala-Blanco4, Ali Dehghan Firoozabadi5, Ismael Soto6, Fabian Seguel6.
Abstract
Underground Mining (UM) is a hostile industry that generally requires a wireless communication system as a cross-cutting axis for its optimal operation. Therefore, in the last five years, it has been shown that, in addition to radio-frequency-based communication links, wireless optical communications, such as Visible Light Communication (VLC), can be applied to UM environments. The application of VLC systems in underground mines, known as UM-VLC, must take into account the unique physical features of underground mines. Among the physical phenomena found in underground mines, the most important ones are the positioning of optical transmitters and receivers, irregular walls, shadowing, and a typical phenomenon found in tunnels known as scattering, which is caused by the atmosphere and dust particles. Consequently, it is necessary to use proper dust particle distribution models consistent with these scenarios to describe the scattering phenomenon in a coherent way in order to design realistic UM-VLC systems with better performance. Therefore, in this article, we present an in-depth study of the interaction of optical links with dust particles suspended in the UM environment and the atmosphere. In addition, we analytically derived a hemispherical 3D dust particle distribution model, along with its main statistical parameters. This analysis allows to develop a more realistic scattering channel component and presents an enhanced UM-VLC channel model. The performance of the proposed UM-VLC system is evaluated using computational numerical simulations following the IEEE 802.1.5.7 standard in terms of Channel Impulse Response (CIR), received power, Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Root Mean Square (RMS) delay spread, and Bit Error Rate (BER). The results demonstrate that the hemispherical dust particle distribution model is more accurate and realistic in terms of the metrics evaluated compared to other models found in the literature. Furthermore, the performance of the UM-VLC system is negatively affected when the number of dust particles suspended in the environment increases.Entities:
Keywords: VLC channel modeling; dust particle distribution modeling; scattering; underground mining visible light communication (UM-VLC)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35408098 PMCID: PMC9003594 DOI: 10.3390/s22072483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Geometry of the channel components that make up the SISO UM-VLC system.
Figure 2Proposed hemispherical scatterers spatial distribution around the PD for the downlink Cartesian/spherical coordinates relating the LED, an arbitrary dust particle, and the PD.
UM-VLC system simulation parameters.
| UM Simulation Scenario | Values | References |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Dimensions ( | ( | |
| Coordinates of the | ( | |
| Coordinates of the | ( | |
|
| ||
| Absorption coefficient, ( | 1.3 | [ |
| Atmospheric parameter, | 0.017 | [ |
| Atmospheric parameter, | 0.72 | [ |
| Atmospheric parameter, | 0.5 | [ |
| AWGN power spectral density ( |
| [ |
| LED rotation angle, | 45 | [ |
| LED tilt angle, | 45 | [ |
| Noise bandwidth (MHz) | 100 | [ |
| PD rotation angle, | 45 | [ |
| PD tilt angle, | 45 | [ |
| Scatterer reflection coefficient, | 0.1 | [ |
| Scattering coefficient, ( | 0.4 | [ |
| Sphere radius, | 1 | [ |
| Wall reflection coefficient, | 0.6 | [ |
| Wall rotation angle, | [ | |
| Wall tilt angle, | [ | |
|
| ||
| Average transmitted power, | 5 | [ |
| Band-pass filter of transmission | 1 | [ |
| Dust concentration | 15 | [ |
| Dust particle radius, | [ | |
| FoV, | 70 | [ |
| Gain of the optical filter | 1 | [ |
| Lambertian mode number, | 1 | [ |
| LED wavelength, | 580 | [ |
| Modulation type | OOK | [ |
| Modulation bandwidth (MHz) | 50 | [ |
| Modulation index | 0.3 | [ |
| Optical filter bandwidth (nm) | 340 to 694.3 | [ |
| Optical filter center wavelength (nm) | 580 ± 2 | [ |
| Optical filter full width half max (nm) | 10 ± 2 | [ |
| Physical active area, | 1 | [ |
| Reflective element area, | 1 | [ |
| Refractive index, | 1.5 | [ |
| Responsivity, | 0.53 | [ |
| Semi-angle at half power, | 60 | [ |
Figure 3UM-VLC CIR curves for (a) 40 and 60 dust particles in the hemispheric area, and UM-VLC reference scenario, Reprinted from Ref. [12], and (b) 100, 150, and 200 dust particles in the hemispheric area.
Figure 4CIR of the scattering component with different values of N in the evaluated UM scenario.
Maximum CIR values for each value of N.
|
| CIR Maximum Value |
|---|---|
| 20 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 80 |
|
| 120 |
|
| 160 |
|
| 200 |
|
Figure 5Empirical CDF and distribution of the received power in the UM-VLC scenario with (a) 40, (b) 60, (c) 100, (d) 150, (e) 200 dust particles in the hemispheric area, and (f) UM-VLC reference scenario, Reprinted from Ref. [12].
Figure 6Empirical CDF of the SNR obtained for different values of N in the hemispheric area of the UM-VLC scenario evaluated.
Figure 7Empirical CDF and distribution of the RMS Delay spread in the UM-VLC scenario with (a) 40, (b) 60, (c) 100, (d) 150, (e) 200 dust particles in the hemispheric area, and (f) UM-VLC reference scenario, Reprinted from Ref. [12].
Figure 8BER curves for different values of N in the hemispheric area of the evaluated UM-VLC scenario and the UM-VLC reference scenario, Reprinted from Ref. [12].