| Literature DB >> 35407986 |
Tao Li1, Haixin Li1, Jingchen Yuan1, Yong Xia1, Yuejun Liu1, Aokui Sun1,2.
Abstract
In recent years, aqueous zinc ion batteries (ZIBs) have attracted much attention due to their high safety, low cost, and environmental friendliness. Owing to the unique layered structure and more desirable layer spacing, transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) materials are considered as the comparatively ideal cathode material of ZIBs which facilitate the intercalation/ deintercalation of hydrated Zn2+ between layers. However, some disadvantages limit their widespread application, such as low conductivity, low reversible capacity, and rapid capacity decline. In order to improve the electrochemical properties of TMDs, the corresponding modification methods for each TMDs material can be designed from the following modification strategies: defect engineering, intercalation engineering, hybrid engineering, phase engineering, and in-situ electrochemical oxidation. This paper summarizes the research progress of TMDs as cathode materials for ZIBs in recent years, discusses and compares the electrochemical properties of TMD materials, and classifies and introduces the modification methods of MoS2 and VS2. Meanwhile, the corresponding modification scheme is proposed to solve the problem of rapid capacity fading of WS2. Finally, the research prospect of other TMDs as cathodes for ZIBs is put forward.Entities:
Keywords: aqueous zinc ion batteries; cathode materials; modification strategy; transition metal dichalcogenides
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407986 PMCID: PMC9000242 DOI: 10.3390/ma15072654
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Disassembly diagram of coin-type ZIBs; (b) The trend of publications on TMDs as ZIBs cathode materials.
Figure 2(a) Illustration of TMD structure; (b) Atomic structures of 1T-, 2H-, and 3R-MoS2 [31].
Fabrication methods, precursors and synthesis conditions of TMDs as ZIBs cathode.
| Products | Method | Precursors | Temperature | Duration | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MoS2−x | Hydrothermal | (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, TAA | 200 °C | 18 h | [ |
| E- MoS2 | Hydrothermal | Na2MoO4, CS(NH2)2, carbon cloth, glucose, HCl | 190 °C | 24 h | [ |
| MoS2-O | Hydrothermal | (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, thiourea | 180 °C | 24 h | [ |
| MoS2·nH2O | Hydrothermal | (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, thiourea | 170 °C | 24 h | [ |
| MoS2/PANI | Solvothermal | Na2MoO4, thiourea, C17H33CO2Na, ethanol, OA, HCl | 180 °C | 24 h | [ |
| MoS2@CNTs | Hydrothermal | Na2MoO4·2H2O, thiourea, CNTs, glucose | 200 °C | 24 h | [ |
| MoS2-160 | Hydrothermal | (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, thiourea | 160 °C | 24 h | [ |
| VS2 | Hydrothermal | NH4VO3, TAA, NH3·H2O | 180 °C | 20 h | [ |
| VS2@SS | Hydrothermal | NH4VO3, TAA, NH3·H2O, stainless steel mesh | 180 °C | 10 h | [ |
| rGO-VS2 | Solvothermal | VO(acac)2, cysteine, GO, NMP | 200 °C | 8 h | [ |
| VS2@VOOH | Hydrothermal | V2O5, TAA, NH3·H2O | 180 °C | 18 h | [ |
| VS2·NH3 | Solvothermal | VO(acac)2, TAA, NMP | 200 °C | 24 h | [ |
| VS2/VOx | Solvothermal | Na3VO4·12H2O, TAA, ethylene | 180 °C | 20 h | [ |
| 1T-WS2 | Solvothermal | WCl6, TAA, DMF | 200 °C | 24 h | [ |
| VSe2 | Chemical Liquid Phase Synthesis | VO(acac)2, Se powder, OAm | 330 °C | 5 h | [ |
Figure 3Defect atoms in TMDs singer layer.
Figure 4(a) HRTEM image of the defect−rich MoS2 and its rate performance [38]; (b) HRTEM images of oxygen incorporated MoS2 (left showing oxygen incorporated MoS2, right showing pristine MoS2) and the rate performance of oxygen incorporated MoS2 [40]; (c) HRTEM image of MoS2·nH2O and the rate performance of Zn/MoS2·nH2O batteries [41]; (d) HRTEM image of the MoS2/PANI−150 hybrid and its rate performance [42]; (e) SEM image and rate performance of the MoS2@CNTs hybrid electrode [43]; (f) HRTEM image of MoS2−160, and cycling performances at current densities of 1.0 A g−1 of MoS2 at various temperatures [44].
Figure 5Ion Intercalation in single layer TMDs structure.
Figure 6Modification of TMDs by Hybrid Engineering.
Figure 7(a) HR−TEM image and rate performance of layered VS2 [45]; (b) SEM image of VS2 grown on SS mesh and rate performance of VS2@SS electrode [46]; (c) HRTEM image and rate performance of the rGO−VS2 composites [47]; (d) SEM image and rate performance of the VS2@VOOH−18h [48]; (e) HRTEM image and rate performance of VS2·NH3 electrode [49]; (f) TEM image and rate capability of in−situ electrochemical oxidation formed VS2/VOx [50].
Figure 8Modification of TMDs by in-situ electrochemical oxidation.
Figure 9(a) HRTEM image, Cycling performances at current density of 200 mA g−1 of WS−200 [51]; (b) HRTEM image and rate performance of VSe2 [52].
Summary of the electrochemical performance of TMDs as ZIBs cathode.
| Cathode Material | Electrolyte | Voltage | Capacity [mAh•g−1] | Cycle Stability | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MoS2-O | 3M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.2–1.4V | 232 at 0.1 A g−1 | 68% after 2000 cycles at 1.0 A g−1 | [ |
| E- MoS2 | 2M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.3–1.5V | 202.6 at 0.1 A g−1 | 98.6% after 600 cycles at 1.0 A g−1 | [ |
| MoS2/PANI | 3M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.2–1.3V | 181.6 at 0.1 A g−1 | 86% after 1000 cycles at 1.0 A g−1 | [ |
| MoS2@CNTs | 3M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.3–1.2V | 180 at 0.1 A g−1 | 80.1% after 500 cycles at 1.0 A g−1 | [ |
| MoS2-160 | 3M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.25–1.25V | 168 at 0.1 A g−1 | 98.1% after 400 cycles at 1.0 A g−1 | [ |
| MoS2·nH2O | 3M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.2–1.25V | 165 at 0.1 A g−1 | 88% after 800 cycles at 2.0 A g−1 | [ |
| MoS2−x | 3M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.25–1.25V | 138.6 at 0.1 A g−1 | 87.8% after 1000 cycles at 1.0 A g−1 | [ |
| VS2·NH3 | 2M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.2–1.7V | 390 at 0.1 A g−1 | 110% after 2000 cycles at 3.0 A g−1 | [ |
| VS2/VOx | 25M ZnCl2 | 0.1–1.8V | 260 at 0.1 A g−1 | 75% after 3000 cycles at 1.0 A g−1 | [ |
| rGO-VS2 | 3M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.4–1.7V | 238 at 0.1 A g−1 | 93% after 1000 cycles at 5.0 A g−1 | [ |
| VS2@SS | 1M ZnSO4 | 0.4–1.0V | 187 at 0.1 A g−1 | 80% after 2000 cycles at 2.0 A g−1 | [ |
| VS2@VOOH | 3M Zn (CF3SO3)2 | 0.4–1.0V | 165 at 0.1 A g−1 | 86% after 200 cycles at 0.5 A g−1 | [ |
| VS2 | 1M ZnSO4 | 0.4–1.0V | 159.1 at 0.1 A g−1 | 98% after 200 cycles at 0.5 A g−1 | [ |
| WS-200 | 1M ZnSO4 | 0.1–1.5V | 206.25 at 0.1 A g−1 | 0% after 100 cycles at 0.2 A g−1 | [ |
| VSe2 | 2M ZnSO4 | 0.1–1.6V | 131.8 at 0.1 A g−1 | 80.8% after 500 cycles at 0.1 A g−1 | [ |