| Literature DB >> 35407970 |
Larissa Medeiros de Oliveira1, Robert Saraiva Matos2,3, Ştefan Ţălu4, Ana Luisa Farias Rocha1, Ronald Zico de Aguiar Nunes1, Jaqueline de Araújo Bezerra5, Pedro Henrique Campelo Felix6, Natália Mayumi Inada7, Edgar Aparecido Sanches1, Henrique Duarte da Fonseca Filho8.
Abstract
Biodegradable particles were developed using poly-ε-caprolactone and gelatin carriers containing different concentrations of Allium sativum essential oil (EO) (360 µg/mL, 420 µg/mL, and 460 µg/mL). Atomic force microscopy was useful to evaluate the particles' surface based on morphological parameters. The particles' size varied from 150 nm to 300 nm. The diameter was related to the increase of the particles' height as a function of the EO concentration, influencing the roughness of the surface core values (from 20 to 30 nm) and surface irregularity. The spatial parameters Str (texture aspect ratio) and Std (texture direction) revealed low spatial frequency components. The hybrid parameters Sdq (root mean square gradient) and Sdr (interfacial area ratio) also increased as a function of the EO concentration, revealing fewer flat particles. On the other hand, the functional parameters (inverse areal material ratio and peak extreme height) suggested differences in surface irregularities. Higher concentrations of EO resulted in greater microtexture asperity on the particles' surface, as well as sharper peaks. The nanoscale morphological surface analysis allowed the determination of the most appropriate concentration of encapsulated EO, influencing statistical surface parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Allium sativum; atomic force microscopy; biodegradable particles; essential oil; morphological parameters
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407970 PMCID: PMC9000302 DOI: 10.3390/ma15072635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Two-dimensional and 3D AFM images of (a) P360, (b) P420, and (c) P460 particle surfaces.
Average particle diameter, height, and height/diameter ratio.
| Parameter | P360 | P420 | P460 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter (nm) | 184 ± 30 | 236 ± 49 | 261 ± 47 |
| Height (nm) | 18 ± 5 | 31 ± 6 | 56 ± 6 |
| Height/Diameter (nm) | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.21 ± 0.06 |
Statistical morphological parameters according to ISO 25178-2: 2012.
| Parameter | P360 | P420 | P460 |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Smr * (%) | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 |
| Smc (nm) | 10 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 21 ± 1 |
| Sxp (nm) | 15 ± 2 | 20.4 ± 0.3 | 24 ± 3 |
|
| |||
| Sal (nm) | 0.7 ± 0,1 | 0.64 ± 0.07 | 0.49 ± 0.06 |
| Str * | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.37 ± 0.07 | 0.6 ± 0.2 |
| Std * (°) | 131 ± 74 | 132 ± 74 | 133 ± 74 |
|
| |||
| Sdq (-) | 0.039 ± 0.001 | 0.064 ± 0.001 | 0.100 ± 0.004 |
| Sdr (%) | 0.076 ± 0.005 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.04 |
|
| |||
| Spd (1/μm²) | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.14 ± 0.04 | 0.92 ± 0.06 |
| Spc (1/μm) | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 1.11 ± 0.07 | 2.3 ± 0.3 |
* Samples without significant difference ANOVA One-Way (p < 0.05).
S and volume parameters according to ISO 25178-2:2012.
| Parameter | P360 | P420 | P460 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sk (nm) | 20 ± 2 | 29.013 ± 3 | 30.484 ± 4 |
| Spk (nm) | 8.9 ± 0.9 | 13.397 ± 0.828 | 26.031 ± 4 |
| Svk (nm) | 7.2 ± 0.8 | 9 ± 1 | 14 ± 2 |
| Smr1 (%) | 13 ± 1 | 12.0 ± 0.7 | 17 ± 1 |
| Smr2 * (%) | 89.7 ± 0.8 | 92 ± 1 | 91.0 ± 0.9 |
| Vmp (µm3/µm2) | 4 × 10 –4 ± 4 × 10–5 | 6 × 10–4 ± 4 × 10–5 | 1 × 10–3 ± 1 × 10–4 |
| Vmc (µm3/µm2) | 7 × 10–3 ± 9 × 10–4 | 1.02 × 10–2 ± 8.18 × 10–4 | 1.19 × 10–2 ± 1.04 × 10–3 |
| Vvc (µm3/µm2) | 1 × 10–2 ± 1 × 10–3 | 2 × 10–2 ± 1 × 10–4 | 2 × 10–2 ± 1 × 10–3 |
| Vvv (µm3/µm2) | 9 × 10–4 ± 7 × 10–5 | 1 × 10–3 ± 7 × 10–4 | 1 × 10–3 ± 2 × 10–4 |
* Samples without significant difference ANOVA One-Way (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Graphical evaluation of Sk parameters (left) and volume parameters (right) based on the Abbott curve calculated for (a,d) P360, (b,e) P420, and (c,f) P460.
Figure 3Average PSD spectrum of (a) P360, (b) P420, and (c) P460 systems.