| Literature DB >> 35407934 |
Nataliia Dudchenko1, Shweta Pawar2, Ilana Perelshtein1, Dror Fixler1.
Abstract
Magnetite nanoparticles with different surface coverages are of great interest for many applications due to their intrinsic magnetic properties, nanometer size, and definite surface morphology. Magnetite nanoparticles are widely used for different medical-biological applications while their usage in optics is not as widespread. In recent years, nanomagnetite suspensions, so-called magnetic ferrofluids, are applied in optics due to their magneto-optical properties. This review gives an overview of nanomagnetite synthesis and its properties. In addition, the preparation and application of magnetic nanofluids in optics, nanophotonics, and magnetic imaging are described.Entities:
Keywords: application; magnetic ferrofluids; magnetite nanoparticles; optical devices; synthesis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407934 PMCID: PMC9000335 DOI: 10.3390/ma15072601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Visualization of the magnetite unit cell identified using octahedral Fe2.5+ (dark grey), tetrahedral Fe2+ (light grey), and oxygen (red). The local site symmetries are shown by the octahedral and tetrahedral shapes around fully coordinated Fe sites within the unit cell. The different bond angles between the Fe sites lead to dominant antiferromagnetic coupling between the tetrahedral and octahedral sites, giving a bulk ferrimagnetic order (adapted from [34] with permission from Springer Nature).
Properties of magnetite.
| Properties | Magnetite |
|---|---|
| Molecular formula | Fe3O4 |
| Crystal structure | Cubic |
| Density (g/cm3 ) | 5.18 |
| Melting point (°C) | 1583–1597 |
| Boiling point (°C) | 2623 |
| Color | black |
| Hardness | 5.5 |
| Type of magnetism | ferrimagnetic |
| Curie temperature (K) | 580 |
| Ms at 300 K (A·m2/kg) | 92–100 |
| Magnetism (nanoparticles) | Superparamagnetic |
| Lustre | Metallic |
| Diaphaneity | Opaque |
| Crystal System | Isometric |
| Birefringence | Isotropic minerals have no birefringence |
| Refractive Index values |
Figure 2Schematic representation of magnetite synthesis by co-precipitation method (adapted from [44] with permission from the Taylor & Francis Group).
Figure 3Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) image of magnetite nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method (adapted from [41] with permission from IOP Publishing).
Figure 4High-resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images showing lattice fringes of the magnetite cores (adapted from [50] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019).
Figure 5SEM images of magnetite nanoparticles obtained after hydrothermal synthesis at different temperatures: (a,d) 120 °C, (b,e) 140 °C, and (c,f) 160 °C (adapted from [58] with permission from 2019 Nayely Torres-Gómez et al.).
Figure 6TEM images of iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized using different reaction times in tri(ethylene glycol): (a) 1 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 4 h, (d) 8 h, (e) 12 h, and (f) 24 h (adapted from [63] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 7Magnetite nanoparticle synthesis using plant extracts (adapted from [70] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 8TEM images of a single magnetotactic bacterium (a), of chains of magnetosomes extracted from whole magnetotactic bacteria (b), and of individual magnetosomes detached from the chains (c) (adapted from [74] with permission from 2014 Alphandéry).
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNP) synthesis and their comparison in terms of synthetic routes, advantages, disadvantages, and challenges.
| Method | Conditions | Advantages | Disadvantages | Challenges | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical routes | Co-precipitation | Co-precipitation of ferrous and ferric salts in water with a strong basic solution at room temperature or higher | Simple, large quantity of nanoparticles | Poor morphology and non-stoichiometric magnetite | Size- and shape-controlled synthesis with reproducibility |
| Partial oxidation of ferrous hydroxide | Precipitation of amorphous ferrous hydroxide from a ferrous sulphate solution with subsequent aging at 90 °C in the presence of nitrate ion | Versatility and hydrophilic particles | Goethite formation and extensive nanoparticle agglomeration | High oxidation of ultrafine iron oxide nanoparticles and aggregation of nanoparticles | |
| Reaction in constrained environments | Precipitation of iron oxides using synthetic and biological reactors (apoferritin protein cages, micelles, mesoporous templates, and microemulsion) | Nanoparticles with uniform dimensions preventing oxidation and particle interaction | Complicated conditions | Purification of nanoparticles and scale-up procedures | |
| Hydrothermal or high-temperature reactions | Wet-chemical method of magnetite nanoparticles obtained using reactor or autoclave, with a pressure of >6000 Pa and a temperature of >200 °C | Nanoparticles of different shapes and morphologies with high crystallinity | High temperatures and pressures | Need expensive facilities | |
| Polyol method | High-temperature decomposition of ferric precursors in the polyol medium | Low cost, hydrolytic stability, and nanoparticles with controlled shape and size | Usage of toxic solvents | Thermal instability and flammability | |
| Sol–gel synthesis | Wet-chemical process based on hydrolysis and polycondensation of iron precursors with the formation of a “sol” and further drying (“gel” formation) | Monodispersity, good control of particle size, control of microstructure, desirable shape and length of the products, high purity, and good crystallinity | Long completion time and toxic organic solvents | Contamination of the product with the matrix component | |
| Sonochemical synthesis | Chemical reaction occurs due to the application of ultrasound irradiation, which causes acoustic cavitation in the aqueous solutions | Nanoparticles with high crystallinity, saturation magnetization, and narrow size distribution | Shape and size of nanoparticles obtained are difficult to control | Mechanism of reaction is still not well understood | |
| Biological routes | Bacterial | Precipitation of magnetite nanoparticles inside a bacterial magnetosome | Non-toxic, biocompatible, and unique crystal shape | Culturing microorganisms takes more time and complicated equipment | Limited knowledge about biomineralization process and time-consuming |
| Plants | Mixing precursor salts with green substrates that act as reducing and limiting agents | Non-toxic, biocompatible, and eco-friendly | Difficulty controlling size and properties | Limited knowledge about the mechanism of the process and time-consuming | |
Figure 9Schematic representation of the preparation of magnetic nanofluids.
Figure 10Schematic representation of the aqueous and kerosene-based magnetic fluid preparation by dispersing double surfactant (oleic acid (blue string) and sodium oleate (green string)) Fe3O4 MNPs using the two-step wet chemical synthesis method (adapted from [90] with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 11Reversible optical responses of a 100 nm Fe3O4 colloid under increasing or decreasing external magnetic field (H): (a) digital photos of the Fe3O4 colloid without H (left) and with H (right); (b) blue shift in the reflection when H is enhanced; and (c) red shift in the reflection when H is weakened (adopted from [100] with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 12Application of magnetic ferrofluids for the preparation of photonic materials.
Figure 13Schematic diagram of (a) the experimental setup for magnetic feld sensing and (b) the in-line Mach–Zehnder interferometer in tapered photonic crystal fiber (PCF), with single mode fiber (SMF) (adapted from [108] with permission from the Springer Nature).
Figure 14Application of magnetic ferrofluids for fabrication of magnetic field sensors.
Figure 15Suspended particle device (SPD) technologies for switchable shading and control of optical transparency. An active fluid is contained within a glass–glass laminate in which an external trigger allows for variable orientation of (a) suspended particles or (b) liquid crystals. (c) A passive fluid with variable transparency flows through a microfluidic device (adapted from [111] with permission from John Wiley and Sons).
Figure 16Schematic illustration of the formation of the magnetic microrods by applying a magnetic field (a). Schematic illustration of magnetic rods vertically oriented by controlling the magnetic field (b). Smart phone screen showing the university logo through the transparent cavity filled with magnetic rods (c). Microscopic image of the vertically oriented magnetic rods (d). Schematic illustration of magnetic rods oriented parallel to the surface by controlling the magnetic field (e). Smart phone screen showing the university logo through the transparent cavity filled with magnetic rods when the rods are in parallel to the surface (f). Microscopic image of the parallel oriented magnetic rods (g). The scale bars represent 100 μm (adapted from [112] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 17Concept of iron oxide NP application in MR imaging (adopted from [113] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 18T1-weighted MR images (B0 = 1 T) of mice collected before (control group) and after intravenous injection of Fe3O4-PAA at time points of 30, 60, 90, 120, 160, and 180 min (a). The corresponding relative T1-weighted signals extracted from (b) tumor (orange circle) and (c) kidney (dark yellow circle) sites (adapted from [118]).
Figure 19The molecular structures of PTB7-F20 and PC71BM (a); the conventional device structure of PSCs without incorporating any Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) (b); the conventional device structure of PSCs incorporated with Fe3O4 MNPs and aligned by an external magnetostatic field (c); the fabrication procedures of PSCs incorporated with Fe3O4 MNPs and aligned by an external magnetostatic field (d)–(f); BHJ active layer incorporated with Fe3O4 MNPs was spin-coated on a PEDOT:PSS-coated ITO substrate (d); and a ferromagnet was suspend above the surface of BHJ composite incorporated with the Fe3O4 MNP layer. The magnetic intensity was ~30–40 G, and the distance between the ferromagnet and BHJ composite layer was ~10 cm (e); oriented Fe3O4 MNPs inside BHJ active layer by an external magnetostatic field. In pre-devices (f), a drawing of a partial enlargement of the Fe3O4 MNP in (c), showing an antiparallel relation between the magnetic dipole (caused by the Fe3O4 crystal inside the particle) and electric dipole (caused by the difference in charge density between the inside Fe3O4 and outside organic coater) (g) (adapted from [132] with permission from Scientific Reports).
Magnetic ferrofluids (FF) applications, descriptions, and challenges in optics and nanophotonics.
| Application | Description | Challenges |
|---|---|---|
| Photonic materials | Superparamagnetic magnetite nanocrystals or nanoclusters with tunable sizes from 30 to 200 nm in water | NPs with controlled diameters and stoichiometric structures |
| Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) | Gold-doped magnetite nanoparticles | Size of magnetite nanoparticles and aggregation of nanoparticles |
| Magnetic field sensors | Combination of different shape of optical fibers and optical grating with magnetic FFs | Long-term colloidal |
| “Smart” windows | Nanoscale magnetite nanoparticles from 50 to 100 nm used for shading and the optical properties of the window controlled through remote switching of magnetic field | Long-term colloidal |
| Magnetic resonance imaging | Exceedingly small superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs (up to ~10 nm) with various surface modifications | Reproducibility, scalability of synthesis, and functionalization of the surface for specifically targeting to different tissues and cells |
| Solar energy harvesting | Sensitized solar cells based on MNPs | Nanoparticle sedimentation and aggregation, cost of nanomaterials, and toxicity |