| Literature DB >> 35407906 |
Agnieszka Różycka1, Łukasz Kotwica1.
Abstract
This paper aims to study the suitability of partial replacement of lime by waste originating from the cleaning of flue gases from the combustion of industrial wastes in the production of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC). The compressive strength, bulk density, pore structure, phase composition, and microstructure of hydration products of the AAC were analyzed. According to the results, the addition of the waste can effectively enhance the mechanical properties of AAC due to the differences in morphology of hydration product-1.1 nm tobermorite and related dense microstructure. The pore size distribution was significantly influenced by waste addition, which was one of the main reasons for the increase in thermal conductivity. The XRD and SEM results showed that foreign ions introduced with the wastes affect the synthesis of 1.1 nm tobermorite. Moreover, it was shown that waste containing a high content of CaO can be used as lime replacement, which allows reducing CO2 emissions during the AAC production process.Entities:
Keywords: 1.1 nm tobermorite; CO2 emission; autoclaved aerated concrete; calcareous waste; calcium silicate hydrates
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407906 PMCID: PMC9000008 DOI: 10.3390/ma15072576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of the waste (wt.%).
| Composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | Na2O | K2O | CaO | MgO | TiO2 | SO3 | P2O5 | Cl | Br | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.03 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 3.15 | 0.75 | 67.45 | 0.39 | 0.14 | 5.09 | 0.07 | 18.43 | 0.14 | 0.08 |
Mix proportions of autoclaved aerated concrete (kg/m3).
| Sample | Mix Proportion (kg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPC | Quartz Sand | Lime | Aluminum Powder | Waste | Water | |
| Ref. | 78 | 531 | 99 | 0.4 | 0 | 347 |
| R-AAC | 78 | 531 | 89 | 0.4 | 27 | 347 |
| C-AAC | 78 | 531 | 89 | 0.4 | 25 | 347 |
Figure 1XRD patterns of raw and calcined waste.
Figure 2TEM microphotograph of raw waste: (a) hexagonal plate of portlandite together with fine grains of other compounds; (b) detailed view of fine grains of the waste.
Figure 3Differential gravimetric curve (DTG) of waste together with MS.
The bulk density of AAC samples.
| Sample | Bulk Density | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| ref. AAC | 703 | 100 |
| R-AAC | 667 | 95 |
| C-AAC | 677 | 96 |
Figure 4The porous microstructure of the investigated AAC samples: (a) reference sample; (b) R-AAC; (c) C-AAC.
Compressive strength of AAC samples.
| Sample | Compressive Strength | Relative Strength |
|---|---|---|
| ref. AAC | 2.6 | 100 |
| R-AAC | 3.9 | 150 |
| C-AAC | 3.4 | 131 |
Figure 5SEM microphotograph of AAC samples: (a) reference sample; (b) R-AAC; (c) C-AAC.
Thermal conductivity of AAC samples.
| Sample | Thermal Conductivity (W/(m·K)) | Relative Thermal Conductivity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| ref. AAC | 0.148 | 100 |
| R-AAC | 0.165 | 112 |
| C-AAC | 0.168 | 114 |
Figure 6XRD pattern of AAC samples (T—1.1 nm tobermorite, Q—quartz, C—C–S–H phase). On the right, a comparison of the main tobermorite peaks for investigated concretes is plotted.