| Literature DB >> 35407841 |
Sheraz Ullah1, Muhammad Izhar Shah1, Muwaffaq Alqurashi2, Muhammad Faisal Javed1, Osama Dawood1, Fahid Aslam3, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq4, Enas E Hussain5.
Abstract
The consumption of waste materials in the construction sector is a sustainable approach that helps in reducing the environmental pollution and decreases the construction cost. The present research work emphasizes the mechanical properties of bituminous concrete mix prepared with crumb rubber (CR) and waste sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA). For the preparation of bituminous concrete mix specimens with CR and SCBA, the effective bitumen content was determined using the Marshall Mix design method. A total of 15 bituminous concrete mix specimens with 4%, 4.5%, 5%, 5.5% and 6% of bitumen content were prepared, and the effective bitumen content turned out to be 4.7%. The effect of five different CR samples of 2%, 4%, 6%, 8% and 10% by weight of total mix and SCBA samples of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% by weight of filler were investigated on the performance of bituminous concrete. A total of 180 samples with different percentages of CR and SCBA were tested for indirect tensile strength (ITS) and Marshall Stability, and the results were compared with conventional bituminous concrete mix. It was observed that the stability values rose with an increase in CR percentage up to 6%, while the flow values rose as the percentage of SCBA increased in the mix. Maximum ITS results were observed at 4% CR and 25% SCBA replacement levels. However, a decrease in stability and ITS result was observed as the percentages of CR and SCBA increased beyond 4% and 25%, respectively. We concluded that the optimum CR and SCBA content of 4% and 25%, respectively, can be effectively used as a sustainable alternative in bituminous concrete mix.Entities:
Keywords: Marshall stability; bituminous concrete; experimental testing; indirect tensile strength; waste utilization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407841 PMCID: PMC8999489 DOI: 10.3390/ma15072509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Coarse aggregates used in the study.
Properties of the aggregates with standard specifications.
| Aggregate Tests | ASTM Standards | Specification Limits | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific gravity | ASTM C127 [ | – | 2.68 |
| Los Angeles abrasion (%) | ASTM C131 [ | <30% | 20.43 |
| Impact value (%) | ASTM D 5874-95 [ | <30% | 15.12 |
| Water absorption (%) | ASTM C128 [ | – | 0.5 |
| Flakiness (%) | ASTM D 4791-99 [ | 10% | 7.45 |
| Elongation (%) | ASTM D 4791-99 [ | 10% | 6.34 |
Figure 280/100 grade of bitumen used in the study.
Properties of the bitumen with standard specifications.
| Bitumen Tests | ASTM Standards | Specification Limits | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Softening Point | ASTM D36-95 [ | 48–56 °C | 53 °C |
| Ductility | ASTM D113-86 [ | min 100 cm | 109 cm |
| Penetration | ASTM D5-97 [ | 60–70 MM | 66.53 mm |
| Flash Point | ASTM D92 [ | min 232 °C | 279 °C |
| Fire Point | ASTM D92 [ | min 242 °C | 284 °C |
| Specific Gravity | ASTM D70 [ | 1.01–1.06 | 1.04 |
Figure 3Waste materials used in this study. (a) Crumb Rubber (CR). (b) Sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Chemical composition of crumb rubber [59].
| Material | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Rubber Hydrocarbons | 45.2 |
| Carbon black | 25.8 |
| Acetone Extract | 14.2 |
| Isoprene | 12.1 |
| Water | 0.8 |
| Ash content | 0.9 |
| Fiber content | 0.5 |
| Metal Content | 0.08 |
| Others | 0.42 |
Oxides composition of sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA).
| Oxides, wt% | |
|---|---|
| SiO2 | 66.70 |
| Al2O3 | 9.24 |
| Fe2O3 | 1.53 |
| CaO | 10.07 |
| MgO | 4.60 |
| MnO | 0.05 |
| Na2O | 1.30 |
| K2O | 2.51 |
| TiO2 | 0.25 |
| P2O5 | 1.55 |
| LOI | 2.21 |
National Highway Authority (NHA) class “A” materials selection criteria.
| Mix Designation | NHA Class A | |
|---|---|---|
| Compacted thickness | 50–80 mm | |
| mm | in | Percent Passing by Weight |
| 25 | 1 | 100 |
| 19 | 3/4 | 90–100 |
| 13 | 1/2 | – |
| 10 | 3/8 | 56–70 |
| 5 | No. 4 | 35–50 |
| 2 | No. 8 | 23–35 |
| 1 | No. 16 | 5–12 |
| 0 | No. 200 | 2–8 |
|
| ||
| Percentage of total mix | 3.5 (Min) | |
NHA specifications for Marshall Parameters.
| Description | NHA General Specification, 1998 |
|---|---|
| Compaction blows | 75 |
| Stability (kg) | 1000 (Minimum) |
| Flow (0.01 inch) | 8–14 |
| VMA | >13 |
| VFB | 70–90 |
Figure 4Asphalt concrete samples for Marshall stability testing.
Figure 5Effective bitumen content (EBC) calculation using the bitumen content in the mix versus (a) Marshall tability; (b) Air Voids (Va); (c) Marshall flow; (d) Voids in Mineral Aggregate (VMA); (e) Voids Filled by Bitumen (VFB); (f) Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb).
Determination of Effective Bitumen Content (EBC).
| Parameter | % Bitumen Content |
|---|---|
| Bitumen content at the highest stability | 4.5% |
| Bitumen content at the highest value of bulk specific gravity | 4.5% |
| Bitumen content at the median of allowed percentages of air voids | 5.0% |
| Effective Bitumen Content (EBC)—Mean Value | 4.7% |
Figure 6Testing of the asphalt concrete specimens for Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS).
Figure 7Effect of additions of CR and SCBA on split tensile strength of asphalt concrete.
Figure 8Asphalt concrete specimens prepared and tested for Marshall stability and flow.
Figure 9Effect of additions of CR and SCBA on stability of asphalt concrete.
Figure 10Effect of additions of CR and SCBA on flow of asphalt concrete.