| Literature DB >> 35407694 |
Valentina Loganina1, Olga Davydova1, Roman Fediuk2,3, Mugahed Amran4,5, Sergey Klyuev6,7, Alexander Klyuev6, Linar Sabitov7,8, Karina Nabiullina7.
Abstract
Lime materials are in great demand for the restoration of the walls of historical buildings. However, lime coatings have insufficient resistance during operation. The purpose of this work was the modification of lime mortars with silicic acid sol in order to obtain more durable crystalline materials for construction purposes. A technology has been developed for obtaining a silica-containing additive, which consists in passing a liquid glass solution with a density of 1.053 kg/m3 through a cationic column and obtaining a silicic acid sol with a pH of 3-4 and a charge of (-) 0.053 V. The regeneration time and the amount of sol have been determined. Regularities of change in the radius of particles of silicic acid sol depending on age are determined. It is established that at an early age (up to 5 days), the radius of sol particles can be determined in accordance with the Rayleigh equation, and at a later age, in accordance with the Heller equation. The results of the calculation show that at the age of 1-5 days, the radius of the sol particles is 17.1-17.9 nm, and then the particles become coarser and the particle radius is 131.2-143 nm at the age of 19 days. The work of adhesion of silicic acid sol to lime and the heat of wetting are estimated. It is shown that the work of adhesion of water to lime is 28.9 erg/cm2, and that of the sol is 32.8 erg/cm2. The amount of heat Q released when lime is wetted with SiO2 sol is 15.0 kJ/kg, and when lime is wetted with water, it is 10.6 kJ/kg.Entities:
Keywords: durability; fresh properties; green composite; hardened properties; lime mortars; silicic acid sol
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407694 PMCID: PMC8999692 DOI: 10.3390/ma15072360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Mix proportions.
| Lime:Sol | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1:0.25 | 1:0.5 | 1:1 |
Figure 1Ion exchange column: 1—sodium silicate solution; 2—glass wool; 3—cation resin; 4—crane.
Figure 2Dependence of optical density on the volume of electrolyte-coagulator.
Figure 3Dependence of optical density on the volume of PVA stabilizer.
Figure 4The kinetics of changes in the pH of the lime—sol system, depending on the ratio of lime: sol and the aging period of silica sol: 1—1 day; 2—5 days; 3—10 days; 4—15 days; 5—19 days;.6—stabilized sol; 7—Aerosil; 8—Aerosil heated. Note. * the ratio of the mass of lime to the mass of 2% silicic acid sol is given along the y-axis.
The values of the radius of the sol particles depending on the aging period.
| Silica Sol Aging Time, Days | Radius of Sol Particles, nm |
|---|---|
| 1 | 17 |
| 3 | 18 |
| 4 | 22 |
| 5 | 25 |
| 7 | 57 |
| 12 | 83 |
| 15 | 113 |
Influence of silicic acid sol aging time on its activity.
| Silica Sol Aging Time, Days | Sol Activity, % |
|---|---|
| 1 | 83.3 |
| 5 | 80.7 |
| 10 | 75.5 |
| 15 | 70.3 |
| 19 | 59.8 |
| Stabilized sol | 78.1 |
| Aerosil | 10.7 |
| Aerosil heated | 9.8 |
Values of compressive strength R, MPa.
| Hardening Time, Days | Compressive Strength of Control Composition, mpa | Ratio Lime:Silicic Acid Sol | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:0.25 | 1:05 | 1:1 | |||||
| R | ΔR | R | ΔR | R | ΔR | ||
| 7 | 0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.93 | 0.68 | ||
| 14 | 0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.72 | 0.21 | 0.97 | 0.46 | 1.25 | 0.74 | ||
| 28 | 0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.95 | 0.10 | 1.23 | 0.38 | 1.70 | 0.85 | ||
Note. Above the line are the values of compressive strength when using the sol with an aging period of 15 days, under the line—with an aging period of 1 day.
RMS particle shift for sols of different ages.
| Sol Aging, Days | Root-Mean-Square Particle Shift in 10 s, m |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.89 × 10−5 |
| 5 | 1.51 × 10−5 |
| 10 | 7.72 × 10−6 |
| 15 | 5.83 × 10−6 |
| 19 | 5.34 × 10−6 |
Influence of additives on the compressive strength of lime compositions, MPa.
| Aging Time, Days | Control Composition | Lime:Sol Ratio | The Amount of Aerosil in % of the Mass of Lime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:0.5 | 1:1 | |||
| 7 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.26 |
| 14 | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.36 |
| 28 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.6 |
Results of determining the amount of free lime.
| Composition | pH | OH- Ion Concentration, mol/L | The Content of Lime Ca(OH)2 in a Sample of 100 mg | The Content of Unbound (Free) Lime Ca(OH)2,% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 11.43 | 10−2.57 | 20 mg | 49.8 |
| Composition with sol | 11.33 | 10−2.67 | 20 mg | 39.6 |
Figure 5Photographs of the surface of coatings based on the control composition (a) and the composition with the addition of silicic acid sol (b), ×200.
Figure 6Micrographs of the fracture surface of coatings based on the control composition (a) and the composition with the addition of silicic acid sol (b), ×1000.