| Literature DB >> 35407691 |
Magdalena Stan1, Radosław Lach1, Paweł A Krawczyk1, Wojciech Salamon2, Jakub Haberko3, Jacek Nizioł3, Anita Trenczek-Zając1, Łukasz Gondek3, Błażej Kowalski4, Antoni Żywczak2.
Abstract
In this paper, we report on a successful synthesis of dysprosium iron garnet Dy3Fe5O12 (DyIG) by a reactive synthesis method involving dysprosium iron perovskite and hematite. Phase formation was traced using dilatometry, and XRD measurements attested to the formation of the desired structure. Samples with relative density close to 97% were fabricated. The samples were characterized using vibrating sample magnetometry, dielectric spectroscopy, and UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy. Magnetic properties were probed in temperatures between 80 and 700 K with a maximum applied field of 1 kOe. The measurements revealed several effects: the compensation of magnetic moments at a certain temperature, the inversion of the magnetocaloric effect, and the ability to measure the Curie temperature of the material. Activation energy was determined from UV-Vis-NIR and dielectric spectroscopy measurements. Characteristic magnetic temperatures and activation energy values of the samples were similar to bulk DyIG obtained using other methods.Entities:
Keywords: dielectric properties; magnetic properties; rare-earth iron garnet; synthesis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407691 PMCID: PMC8999950 DOI: 10.3390/ma15072356
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Specific surface area and particle sizes of the reactants.
| Materials | Sw [m2/g] | DBET [nm] |
|---|---|---|
| Fe2O3 | 86.62 | 13.7 |
| DyIP (DyFeO3) | 10.27 | 76.9 |
Figure 1X-ray diffraction pattern of Dy3Fe5O12 with results of the Rietveld refinement.
Figure 2Dilatometric and derivative curves of the DyFeO3–Fe2O3 mixture.
Relative density [% theoretical] of the sintered samples.
| Temperature [°C] | Relative Density [%] |
|---|---|
| 1200 | 85.22 ± 0.02 |
| 1300 | 93.79 ± 0.05 |
| 1400 | 96.92 ± 0.02 |
± confidence interval at confidence level 95%.
Figure 3SEM micrographs of the sample sintered at 1400 °C.
Figure 4(a) The crystal structure of DyIG; (b) Unit cell of DyIG; (c) Magnetic moments below compensation temperature; (d) Magnetic moments above compensation temperature; (e) Temperature dependent magnetization at 0.1 T for DyIG; (f) Derivative of the temperature-dependence magnetization at 1 kOe was used for determination of characteristic temperatures.
Characteristic magnetic temperatures of DyIG.
| Process | Tcomp (K) | TO (K) | TC (K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heating | 225 | 409 | 550 |
| Cooling | 220 | 396 | 531 |
Figure 5(a) UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy measurement of the DyIG sample and (b) fits to the linear regions of the function, linear fits are traced with different colors for better clarity. The colors of Eg values provided on the graph correspond to the colors of corresponding fitted lines.
Figure 6Real (a) and imaginary (b) part of the sample’s impedance as a function of temperature and frequency, measured by BDS.
Figure 7An example of a Cole–Cole plot using the data recorded at T = 180 °C. Right-hand side of the semicircle corresponds to lower frequencies, while the left-hand side to high frequencies [46].
Figure 8Arrhenius plot of static resistivity. Labels are temperatures in °C.