| Literature DB >> 35407687 |
Guannan Yang1,2, Zhiqiang Zhou1, Haide Zhang1, Yu Zhang1,2, Zhen Peng3, Pan Gong4, Xin Wang5, Chengqiang Cui1,2.
Abstract
As a traditional interconnect material, silver alloy bonding wires are widely used in electronic packaging, but their propensity to vulcanize quickly has not been sufficiently addressed. The current surface anti-oxidation and anti-sulfidation treatments are often accompanied by a decline in bonding performance, which hinders the use of silver alloy bonding wires in new applications. In the present paper, we develop a new cathodic passivation treatment in a Pd-containing solution for silver bonding wires, which not only significantly improves their vulcanization resistance, but also maintains their bonding performance. The surface of the treated wires remains unaffected after vulcanization in 0.3 μg/m3 of ammonium sulfide for 60 min. Compared to a Pd-free passivation treatment, the bonding strength of the wire passivated with the Pd-containing solution improves from 0.20 to 0.27 N. XPS analysis confirms the existence of Pd on the surface of the wire. The solder ball formed an obtuse angle instead of a sharp angle on the pad, which is beneficial for bonding strength.Entities:
Keywords: bonding strength; cathodic passivation; silver alloy bonding wire; vulcanization resistance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407687 PMCID: PMC8999782 DOI: 10.3390/ma15072355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Compositions of the silver alloy bonding wires.
| Element | Ag (%) | Fe (ppm) | Pd (ppm) | Mg (ppm) | Si (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | ≥99 | ≤5 | ≤1 | ≤2 | ≤1 |
Figure 1(a) Illustration of the cathodic passivation device. (b) Illustrations of the wire bond and the shear force test.
Bonding parameters for the silver bonding wires.
| Parameters | 1st Bond | 2nd Bond |
|---|---|---|
| Bonding time (ms) | 14 | 14 |
| Power (mW) | 55 | 80 |
| Pressure (gf) | 24 | 40 |
| Bonding temperature (°C) | 150 | 150 |
| Electronic flame-off current (mA) | 28 | 0 |
| Electronic flame-off time (μs) | 530 | 0 |
Figure 2Comparison of the surface of the passivated silver alloy bonding wires in different solutions, before and after vulcanization for 20 and 60 min.
Figure 3XPS spectra of the passivated silver plates in the Pd-free solution after storage for 5 days. (a) Survey spectra; (b) Ag3d spectra; (c) Cr2p spectra; (d) O1s spectra.
Figure 4XPS spectra of the passivated silver plates in the Pd-containing solution after storage for 5 days. (a) Survey spectra; (b) Ag3d spectra; (c) Cr2p spectra; (d) O1s spectra; (e) Pd3d spectra.
Relative atomic concentrations of different metallic species on the surfaces of the passivated Ag plates.
| Treatment | Concentrations (in at. %) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | Cr(OH)3 | Cr2O3 | Pd | |
| Passivated in Pd-free solution | 68.8% | 16.4% | 9.2% | - |
| Passivated in Pd-containing solution | 62.3% | 13.5% | 8.4% | 15.8% |
Figure 5Cross-section images of the bonded wires on the pads before the shear force tests. (a) Untreated wire. (b) Wire passivated in the Pd-free solution. (c) Wire passivated in the Pd-containing solution.
Measured contact angles of the bonded wires on the pads.
| Wire Treatment Type | Contact Angle (°) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum | Minimum | Mean | Standard Error | |
| Untreated | 113 | 93 | 104 | 8 |
| Passivated in Pd-free solution | 157 | 104 | 136 | 16 |
| Passivated in Pd-containing solution | 120 | 94 | 108 | 8 |
Figure 6Bonding strength of the untreated silver alloy bonding wires and the silver alloy bonding wires passivated in different solutions.
Figure 7Fracture surface of the untreated and passivated silver alloy bonding wires in different solutions. (a) Untreated wire. (b) Wire passivated in the Pd-free solution. (c) Wire passivated in the Pd-containing solution.