| Literature DB >> 35407577 |
Magdalena Okólska1, Grzegorz Karkowski2, Marcin Kuniewicz2,3, Jacek Bednarek2, Jacek Pająk4, Beata Róg1, Jacek Łach5, Jacek Legutko6,7, Lidia Tomkiewicz-Pająk5.
Abstract
Structural, hemodynamic, and morphological cardiac changes following Fontan operation (FO) can contribute to the development of arrhythmias and conduction disorders. Sinus node dysfunction, junction rhythms, tachyarrhythmias, and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are some of the commonly reported arrhythmias. Only a few studies have analyzed this condition in adults after FO. This study aimed to determine the type and prevalence of arrhythmias and conduction disorders among patients who underwent FO and were under the medical surveillance of the John Paul II Hospital in Krakow. Data for the study were obtained from 50 FO patients (mean age 24 ± 5.7 years; 28 men (56%)). The median follow-up time was 4 (2-9) years. Each patient received a physical examination, an echocardiographic assessment, and a 24 h electrocardiogram assessment. Bradyarrhythmia was diagnosed in 22 patients (44%), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in 14 patients (28%), and VAs in 6 patients (12%). Six patients required pacemaker implantation, and three required radiofrequency catheter ablation (6%). Arrythmias is a widespread clinical problem in adults after FO. It can lead to serious haemodynamic impairment, and therefore requires early diagnosis and effective treatment with the use of modern approaches, including electrotherapy methods.Entities:
Keywords: Fontan operation; cardiac arrhythmias; catheter ablation; single ventricle
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407577 PMCID: PMC9000042 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Procedure of supraventricular arrhythmia ablation in a patient after FO. (A) Fast anatomic map with a high-density voltage map (0.1–0.3 mV) of LT collected during sinus rhythm (CARTO, Biosense Webster Inc.). Extensive scaring at the anterolateral area of the tunnel with multiple double (blue dots) and fragmented potentials (white dots). Fragmented potentials recorded from Pentary diagnostic catheter are shown on the left side of the figure. (B) Activation map of AT (cycle length (CL): 380 ms, 80% of the CL in LT) created with a coherent mapping algorithm (CARTOPRIME, Biosense Webster Inc.). Electrocardiograms recorded from ablation and diagnostic catheters during AT termination are shown on the left side of the figure. White star—spot of AT termination during radiofrequency application.
Baseline characteristics of patients after Fontan operation (FO).
| Variables | Fontan Patients ( |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 24 (5.7) |
| Female sex, | 22 (44) |
| Height, cm | 170 (8.1) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 22.6 (3.2) |
| Anatomic diagnosis, | |
| Tricuspid atresia | 8 (16) |
| Pulmonary stenosis/TGA | 15 (30) |
| Right ventricular hypoplasia | 13 (26) |
| Hypoplastic left heart syndrome | 6 (12) |
| Double-outlet right ventricle with left ventricular hypoplasia | 6 (12) |
| Double-inflow left ventricle | 1 (2) |
| Common atrioventricular canal | 1 (2) |
| Systemic ventricle type, | |
| Left ventricle | 30 (60) |
| Right ventricle | 20 (40) |
| NYHA functional class, | |
| I | 5 (10) |
| II | 41 (82) |
| III | 4 (8) |
| IV | 0 (0) |
| Types of FO, | |
| Total cavopulmonary connection, 48 (96) | |
| Lateral tunnel | 47 |
| Extracardiac conduit | 1 |
| Atriopulmonary connection | 2 (4) |
Abbreviations: NYHA, New York Heart Association; TGA, transposition of great arteries. Continuous data are presented as means (SD), and categorical data as numbers (percentage).
Figure 2Chest X-ray after pacemaker implantation in atriopulmonary projection after an FO procedure: (a) with a VVI epicardial lead after a cardiosurgery procedure and (b) with a DDD endocardial lead after transvenous implantation. L means left side.
Holter measurements, the number of pacemakers implanted, and ablation procedures performed in patients after FO.
| Arrythmia Type, Catheter Ablation, Device Implanted | Fontan Patients ( |
|---|---|
| Dominant SSS with bradycardia | 25 (55%) |
|
Pause >2 s | 6 |
|
Low-atrial rhythm | 5 |
|
Nodal rhythm/atrioventricular dissociation | 5 |
|
AVB-1 | 2 |
|
AVB-2 | 0 |
|
AVB-3 | 6 |
| Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias | 14 (28%) |
|
In the form of sustained AT | 3 (6%) |
|
In the form of nsAT, Svebs | 8 (16%) |
|
In the form of AF/AFL | 2 (4%) |
| VAs (in the form of nsVT and PVC) | 6 (12%) |
| Catheter ablation | 3 (6%) |
|
Paroxysmal AT | 2 (4%) |
|
nsVT and PVC | 1 (2%) |
| Device implanted (VVI/DDD) | 6 (12%) |
| VVI—5, DDD—1, 2 devices removed because of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis |
Abbreviations: SSS, sick sinus syndrome; AVB-1, atrioventricular block type 1, AVB-2 atrioventricular block type 2; AVB-3, atrioventricular block type 3; AT, atrial tachycardia; nsAT, non-sustained atrial tachycardia; Svebs, supraventricular ectopic beats; AF, atrial fibrillation; AFL, atrial flutter; VAs, ventricular arrhythmias; nsVT, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; PVC, premature ventricular contraction; VVI, single (ventricle) chamber pacemaker; DDD, dual-chamber pacemaker.
Dependency between fenestration and systemic ventricle morphology and incidence of rhythm abnormalities.
| Bradycardia | Ventricular Arrhythmia | Supraventricular Arrhythmia | Including AF/AFL | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |||||||||
| Fenestration |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| no | 10 | 62.50% | 6 | 37.50% | 16 | 100% | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 68.8% | 5 | 31.3% | 14 | 87.5% | 2 | 12.5% |
| yes | 17 | 50.00% | 17 | 50.00% | 18 | 82.4% | 6 | 17.6% | 24 | 70.6% | 10 | 29.4% | 31 | 91.2% | 3 | 8.8% |
| 0.41 | 0.16 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |||||||||||||
| no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |||||||||
| Ventricular type |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| Right ventricle | 5 | 50.0% | 5 | 50.0% | 7 | 70.0% | 3 | 30.0% | 7 | 70.0% | 3 | 30.0% | 9 | 90.0% | 1 | 10.0% |
| Left ventricle | 22 | 55.0% | 18 | 45.0% | 37 | 92.5% | 3 | 7.5% | 28 | 70.0% | 12 | 30.0% | 36 | 90.0% | 4 | 10.0% |
| 0.99 | 0.09 | 0.990 | 0.99 | |||||||||||||
Figure 3Dependency between ventricular type (a) and fenestration (b) and the incidence of rhythm abnormalities.