| Literature DB >> 35407297 |
Rihab Ben Ayed1,2, Mejda Ajili1, Yolanda Piñeiro2, Badriyah Alhalaili3, José Rivas2, Ruxandra Vidu4,5, Salah Kouass6, Najoua Kamoun Turki1.
Abstract
Undoped and Mg-doped (y = [Mg2+]/[Fe3+] = 1, 2, 3, and 4 at.%) Fe2O3 thin films were synthesized by a simple spray pyrolysis technique. The thin films were extensively characterized. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis confirmed the successful insertion of Mg in the rhombohedral structure of Fe2O3. In addition, scanning electronic microscope (SEM) and confocal microscope (CM) images showed a homogenous texture of the film, which was free of defects. The rough surface of the film obtained by spray pyrolysis is an important feature for photocatalysis and gas sensor applications. The direct band gap of the doped Fe2O3 films obtained for [Mg2+]/[Fe3+] = 3 at.% was Edir = 2.20 eV, which recommends the Mg-doped iron oxide as an optical window or buffer layer in solar cell devices. The photodegradation performance of Mg-doped Fe2O3 was assessed by studying the removal of methylene blue (MB) under sunlight irradiation, with an effective removal efficiency of 90% within 180 min. The excellent photodegradation activity was attributed to the strong absorption of Mg-doped Fe2O3 in the UV and most of the visible light, and to the effective separation of photogenerated charge carriers.Entities:
Keywords: Mg doping; iron oxide; photocatalysis; physical properties; thin films
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407297 PMCID: PMC9000403 DOI: 10.3390/nano12071179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1XRD patterns of undoped and Mg-doped Fe2O3 thin films for different contents (y = [Mg2+]/[Fe3+] = 1, 2, 3, and 4 at.%).
Figure 2Texture coefficient (TC) for (104) and (110) directions in undoped and Mg-doped Fe2O3 grown films (0 ≤ y = [Mg2+]/[Fe3+] ≤ 4 at.%).
The variation of grain size (D), microstrain (ε), and lattice parameters (a and c) and unit cell volume (V) versus Mg (at.%) content.
| Mg (at.%) | D (nm) | ε × 10−3 | a (Å) | c (Å) | V (Å3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 60.8 | 0.31 | 5.034 | 13.77 | 302.18 |
| 1 | 59.2 | 0.53 | 5.026 | 13.74 | 300.57 |
| 2 | 57.7 | 0.55 | 5.024 | 13.73 | 300.11 |
| 3 | 55.3 | 0.62 | 5.022 | 13.72 | 299.65 |
| 4 | 55.9 | 0.64 | 5.024 | 13.72 | 299.89 |
Figure 3Williamson–Hall plots for the undoped and Mg-doped Fe2O3 thin films.
Figure 4Rietveld refinement patterns of 3 at.% Mg-doped Fe2O3 samples (dots for experimental and solid line for simulated curves).
Figure 5SEM images at two magnifications (1 μm and 200 nm) of the undoped and Mg-doped Fe2O3. The inlets show the cross-sections of the respective thin films.
Figure 63D CM micrographs of undoped and Mg-doped Fe2O3 with different contents ((a) undoped, (b) 1 at.%, (c) 2 at.%, (d) 3 at.%, and (e) 4 at.%).
The surface arithmetic average of absolute values (Sa) and root mean square (Sq) values for undoped and Mg-doped Fe2O3 thin films.
| Mg (at.%) | Sa (nm) | Sq (nm) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 70.7 | 95.1 |
| 1 | 63.4 | 85.5 |
| 2 | 60.6 | 80.6 |
| 3 | 76.6 | 104.1 |
| 4 | 74.9 | 102.6 |
Figure 7EDS Spectrum of the glass substrate (a) and 3 at.% Mg-doped Fe2O3 film (b).
Figure 8The optical transmittance (T) (a) and reflectance (R) (b) of undoped and Mg-doped Fe2O3.
Direct (Eind) and indirect (Edir) band gaps energies values of undoped and Mg-doped Fe2O3 thin films.
| Mg (at.%) | Edir | Eind |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.15 | 1.97 |
| 1 | 2.16 | 1.96 |
| 2 | 2.18 | 1.96 |
| 3 | 2.20 | 1.99 |
| 4 | 2.16 | 1.97 |
Figure 9Time-dependent absorption spectra of MB dye solution in the presence of Fe2O3 (a), 3 at.% Mg-doped Fe2O3 (b) and kinetic degradation of MB dye.