| Literature DB >> 35407226 |
Ali Rehman1, Anwar Saeed2, Zabidin Salleh1, Rashid Jan3, Poom Kumam2,4.
Abstract
The heat transfer ratio has an important role in industry and the engineering sector; the heat transfer ratios of CNT nanofluids are high compared to other nanofluids. This paper examines the analytical investigation of the time-dependent stagnation point flow of a CNT nanofluid over a stretching surface. For the investigation of the various physical restrictions, single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs, MWCNTs) were used and compared. The defined similarity transformation was used, to reduce the given nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) to nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The model nonlinear ordinary differential equations were solved, with an approximate analytical (OHAM) optimal homotopy asymptotic method being used for the model problem. The impact of different parameters such as magnetic field parameter, unsteady parameter, dimensionless nanoparticles volume friction, Prandtl number, and Eckert number are interpreted using graphs, in the form of the velocity and temperature profile.Entities:
Keywords: CNTs; heat transfer; nanofluid; stagnation point; stretching surface
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407226 PMCID: PMC9000273 DOI: 10.3390/nano12071108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Consequence of M (magnetic field parameter) for velocity distribution.
Figure 2Consequence of dimensionless nanoparticle volume friction for velocity distribution.
Figure 3Consequence of unsteady parameter for velocity distribution.
Figure 4Consequence of the Eckert number for temperature distribution.
Figure 5Consequence of Prandtl number for temperature distribution.
Figure 6Effect of skin friction on M and S.
Figure 7Effect on skin friction on M and .
Figure 8Effect of Nusselt number on Pr and Ec.
Figure 9Effect of Nusselt number on Pr and M.
Convergence of the method for .
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 5 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
| 20 |
|
|
| 25 |
|
|
Show the convergence of method for .
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 5 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
| 20 |
|
|
| 25 |
|
|
OHAM and numerical comparison for .
|
| Numerical | OHAM |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.00…. | 1.00…. | 0.0…. |
| 2 | 1.72…. | 1.70…. | |
| 3 | 1.71…. | 1.69…. | |
| 4 | 1.96…. | 1.94…. | |
| 5 | 0.87…. | 0.83…. | |
| 6 | 0.23…. | 0.21…. | |
| 7 | 0.29…. | 0.27…. | |
| 8 | 0.39…. | 0.38…. | |
| 9 | 0.42…. | 0.37…. | |
| 10 | 0.92…. | 0.90…. |
OHAM and numerical comparison for .
|
| Numerical | OHAM |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.00…. | 1.00…. | 0.0…. |
| 2 | 1.31…. | 1.29…. | |
| 3 | 1.12…. | 1.10…. | |
| 4 | 1.70…. | 1.65…. | |
| 5 | 1.44…. | 1.41…. | |
| 6 | 1.34…. | 1.30…. | |
| 7 | 1.95…. | 1.90…. | |
| 8 | 1.90…. | 1.80…. | |
| 9 | 1.54…. | 1.50…. | |
| 10 | 1.35…. | 1.30…. |
The thermo-physical properties.
| Physical Properties | Thermal Conduct |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solid particles | SWCNTs | 6600 | 2600 | 2600 |
| MWCNTs | 3000 | 1600 | 1600 | |
The thermal conductivity values at different volume fractions.
|
| 0.0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.145 | 0.147 | 0.204 | 0.235 | 0.266 |
|
| 0.145 | 0.172 | 0.2 | 0.228 | 0.2257 |