| Literature DB >> 35406879 |
Iliya Zhelev1, Zhana Petkova2, Iliana Kostova3, Stanka Damyanova3, Albena Stoyanova4, Ivanka Dimitrova-Dyulgerova5, Ginka Antova2, Sezai Ercisli6, Amine Assouguem7, Mohammed Kara8, Rafa Almeer9, Amany A Sayed10.
Abstract
The chemical composition of Vitex agnus-castus L. (Verbenaceae family) fruits, collected from two regions in Bulgaria (south-central and north-east Bulgaria), was investigated. The content of proteins (5.3-7.4%), carbohydrates (73.9-78.8%), fiber (47.2-49.9%), ash (2.5-3.0%), essential oils (0.5%), and vegetable oil (3.8-5.0%) were identified in the fruits. The composition of the essential oils (EOs) of Vitex fruits from both regions was determined; the main compounds were 1,8-cineole (16.9-18.8%), α-pinene (7.2-16.6%), sabinene (6.7-14.5%), and bicyclogermacrene (7.3-9.0%), but significant differences in the quantitative and qualitative composition of EOs between the regions were found. The EOs of plants from north-east Bulgaria demonstrated antimicrobial activity against the pathogenic species Salmonella abony, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis, but the Gram-negative bacteria Esсherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited resistance to the oil. Linoleic acid predominated in vegetable oil from both regions, followed by oleic acid. β-sitosterol and γ-tocopherol were the main components in the sterol and tocopherol fraction of the lipids. Phosphatidic acids were the main components in the vegetable oil from north-east Bulgaria, while in the vegetable oil from south-central Bulgaria, all phospholipids were found in almost the same quantity. Overall, significant differences were observed in the chemical composition (proteins, carbohydrates, ash and moisture) of the fruits from the two regions of Bulgaria, as well as in the content of the main components of their essential and vegetable oils.Entities:
Keywords: Vitex agnus-castus fruits; antimicrobial activity; chemical composition; essential and vegetable oils
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406879 PMCID: PMC9002856 DOI: 10.3390/plants11070896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Chemical composition of the fruits 1.
| Content, % | Sample 1 | Sample 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 10.7 ± 0.2 a,2 | 9.6 ± 0.1 b |
| Proteins | 7.4 ± 0.1 a | 5.3 ± 0.1 b |
| Carbohydrates | 73.9 ± 0.7 a | 78.8 ± 0.8 b |
| starch | 23.8 ± 0.2 a | 14.1 ± 0.1 b |
| available sugars | 1.0 ± 0.1 a | 0.7 ± 0.0 b |
| fiber | 47.2 ± 0.5 a | 49.9 ± 0.5 b |
| Ash | 3.0 ± 0.2 a | 2.5 ± 0.1 b |
| Essential oil | 0.5 ± 0.1 a | 0.5 ± 0.0 a |
| Vegetable oil | 5.0 ± 0.1 a | 3.8 ± 0.2 b |
1 Mean ± SD (n = 3). 2 Values with different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p ˂ 0.05) using Duncan’s test.
Chemical composition of EOs of V. agnus-castus fruits 1.
| No. | Compounds, % | RI | Sample 1 | Sample 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 931 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | - 2 | |
| 2. | 939 | 16.6 ± 0.15 b,3 | 7.2 ± 0.1 a | |
| 3. | Camphene | 954 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | - |
| 4. | Sabinene | 971 | 14.5 ± 0.1 b | 6.7 ± 0.1 a |
| 5. | 979 | 1.5 ± 0.0 b | 1.2 ± 0.0 a | |
| 6. | 991 | 2.6 ± 0.0 b | 2.1 ± 0.0 a | |
| 7. | 1003 | 1.9 ± 0.0 b | 0.9 ± 0.0 a | |
| 8. | 1014 | 0.3 ± 0.0 b | 0.6 ± 0.0 a | |
| 9. | 1022 | - | 1.2 ± 0.0 | |
| 10. | Limonene | 1029 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | - |
| 11. | 1,8-Cineole | 1032 | 18.8 ± 0.2 b | 16.9 ± 0.2 a |
| 12. | 1055 | 1.4 ± 0.0 b | 1.2 ± 0.0 a | |
| 13. | cis-Sabinene hydrate | 1065 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | - |
| 14. | Terpinolene | 1080 | - | 0.5 ± 0.0 |
| 15. | 1096 | 0.5 ± 0.0 a | 0.5 ± 0.0 a | |
| 16. | 1118 | - | 0.2 ± 0.0 | |
| 17. | 1136 | - | 0.2 ± 0.0 | |
| 18. | Terpinen-4-ol | 1179 | 1.2 ± 0.0 b | 4.0 ± 0.0 a |
| 19. | 1189 | 2.0 ± 0.0 b | 3.9 ± 0.0 a | |
| 20. | 1208 | - | 0.3 ± 0.0 | |
| 21. | Nerol | 1227 | - | 0.2 ± 0.0 |
| 22. | Geraniol | 1249 | - | 0.2 ± 0.0 |
| 23. | 1316 | - | 0.3 ± 0.0 | |
| 24. | 1333 | 3.3 ± 0.0 b | 6.0 ± 0.1 a | |
| 25. | 1390 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | - | |
| 26. | 1409 | - | 3.4 ± 0.0 | |
| 27. | 1429 | 6.6 ± 0.1 b | 9.0 ± 0.1 a | |
| 28. | (Z)-Farnesene | 1442 | - | 1.0 ± 0.0 |
| 29. | 1454 | - | 8.0 ± 0.1 | |
| 30. | 1456 | - | 0.6 ± 0.0 | |
| 31. | Alloaromadendrene | 1461 | - | 4.4 ± 0.0 |
| 32. | Germacrene D | 1484 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | - |
| 33. | Elixene | 1492 | - | 1.11 ± 0.0 |
| 34. | Bicyclogermacrene | 1501 | 9.0 ± 0.1 b | 7.3 ± 0.1 a |
| 35. | 1513 | - | 0.4 ± 0.0 | |
| 36. | 1522 | - | 0.5 ± 0.0 | |
| 37. | Caryophyllene oxide | 1574 | 0.5 ± 0.0 b | 1.4 ± 0.0 a |
| 38. | Globulol | 1590 | - | 0.3 ± 0.0 |
| 39. | Ledol | 1602 | 2.0 ± 0.0 b | 1.1 ± 0.0 a |
| 40. | (-)-Spathulenol | 1619 | 0.5 ± 0.0 b | 2.4 ± 0.0 a |
| 41. | 1628 | 3.4 ± 0.0 b | 2.2 ± 0.0 a | |
| 42. | 1641 | - | 1.7 ± 0.0 | |
| 43. | β-Eudesmol | 1642 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | - |
| 44. | n-Heptadecane | 1700 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | - |
| 45. | n-Heneicosane | 2100 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | - |
| 46. | Phytol | 2105 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | - |
| 47. | n-Docosane | 2200 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | - |
| 48. | n-Tricosane | 2300 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | - |
| 49. | n-Tetracosane | 2400 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | - |
| 50. | n-Pentacosane | 2500 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | - |
| 51. | n-Hexacosane | 2600 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | - |
| 52. | n-Heptacosane | 2700 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | - |
| 53. | Octacosane | 2800 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | - |
| 54. | Squalene | 2817 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | - |
| Aliphatic hydrocarbons, % | 3.5 | - | ||
| Monoterpene hydrocarbons, % | 45.5 | 20.5 | ||
| Oxygenated monoterpene, % | 26.5 | 32.7 | ||
| Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, % | 17.0 | 36.5 | ||
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes, % | 6.5 | 9.1 | ||
| Diterpenes, % | 0.3 | - | ||
| Triterpenes, % | 0.7 | - | ||
| Phenyl propanoids, % | - | 1.2 | ||
1 Mean ± SD (n = 3). 2 Not identified. 3 Values with different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p ˂ 0.05) using Duncan’s test.
Antimicrobial activity of EOs from Vitex fruits (sample 2 from north-central Bulgaria) 1,2.
| Tested Microorganisms | Inhibition Zone (mm) 3,4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 11.25 ± 0.05 |
| |
| 12.03 ± 0.02 |
| |
| 9.37 ± 0.04 |
| |
| 8.00 ± 0.0 |
| |
| 8.03 ± 0.02 |
| |
| 11.15 ± 0.05 |
| |
| 11.86 ± 0.03 | ||
1 Mean ± SD (n = 3). 2 The antimicrobial activity of the EOs from the sample from south-central Bulgaria was not determined due to the low amounts of oxygenated derivatives. 3 (1) EOs from V. agnus-castus L. fruits; (2) solvent. 4 Figure is representative of three replicates.
Total content of unsaponifiable matter, sterols, phospholipids and tocopherols in the vegetable oils from the fruits 1.
| Biologically Active Components | Sample 1 | Sample 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Unsaponifiable matter, % | ||
| in the oil | 16.6 ± 0.1 a,2 | 24.6 ± 0.2 b |
| in the fruits | 0.8 ± 0.0 a | 0.9 ± 0.0 b |
| Sterols, % | ||
| in the oil | 1.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.5 ± 0.2 a |
| in the fruits | 0.1 ±0.0 a | 0.1 ± 0.0 a |
| Phospholipids, % | ||
| in the oil | 10.4 ± 0.1 a | 9.3 ± 0.1 b |
| in the fruits | 0.5 ± 0.0 a | 0.4 ± 0.0 b |
| Tocopherols, mg/kg | ||
| in the oil | 164 ± 2 b | 305 ± 3 a |
| in the fruits | 8.1 ± 0.1 b | 11.6 ± 0.1 a |
1 Mean ± SD (n = 3). 2 Values with different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p ˂ 0.05) using Duncan’s test.
Fatty acid composition of fruit vegetable oils 1.
| Fatty Acids, % | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caprylic | C 8:0 | - 2 | 0.1 ± 0.0 |
| Capric | C 10:0 | 0.8 ± 0.2 a,4 | 0.3 ± 0.1 b |
| Lauric | C 12:0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 a | 0.1 ± 0.0 b |
| Myristic | C 14:0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 a | 0.2 ± 0.0 b |
| Palmitic | C 16:0 | 9.0 ± 0.2 a | 8.9 ± 0.1 a |
| Palmitoleic | C 16:1 | 0.3 ± 0.0 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 b |
| Margaric | C 17:0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 a | 0.4 ± 0.0 b |
| Stearic | C 18:0 | 3.4 ± 0.2 a | 4.2 ± 0.3 b |
| Oleic | C 18:1 | 14.0 ± 0.1 a | 16.1 ± 0.1 b |
| Linoleic | C 18:2 | 71.5 ± 0.7 a | 66.1 ± 0.6 b |
| Linolenic | C 18:3 | - | 0.6 ± 0.0 |
| Arachidic | C 20:0 | - | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| SFA 3 | 14.2 | 15.7 | |
| UFA | 85.8 | 84.3 | |
| MUFA | 14.3 | 17.6 | |
| UFA | 71.5 | 66.7 | |
1 Mean ± SD (n = 3). 2 Not identified. 3 SFA—saturated fatty acids; UFA—unsaturated fatty acids; MUFA—monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA—polyunsaturated fatty acids. 4 Values with different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p ˂ 0.05) using Duncan’s test.
Sterol, tocopherol and phospholipid composition of fruit vegetable oils 1.
| Compounds, % | Sample 1 | Sample 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Brassicasterol | 12.3 ± 0.1 a,3 | 12.0 ± 0.1 b |
| Campesterol | 13.3 ± 0.1 a | 21.7 ± 0.2 b |
| Stigmasterol | 7.1 ± 0.2 a | 3.1± 0.1 b |
| 43.3 ±0.4 a | 57.1± 0.6 b | |
| Δ5-Avenasterol | 24.0 ± 0.2 a | 6.1± 0.1 b |
|
| ||
| 21.3 ± 0.2 | - 2 | |
| 78.7 ± 0.8 a | 100 ± 0.0 b | |
|
| ||
| Phosphatidylinositol | 18.3 ± 0.2 a | 14.1 ± 0.1 b |
| Phosphatidylcholine | 14.3 ± 0.1 a | 12.6 ± 0.1 b |
| Phosphatidylethanolamine | 17.1 ± 0.2 a | 16.7 ± 0.2 a |
| Phosphatidic acids | 16.8 ± 0.2 a | 23.7 ± 0.3 b |
| Phosphatidylserine | 11.1 ± 0.1 a | 10.7 ± 0.1 b |
| Lysophosphatidylethanolamine | 11.0 ± 0.2 a | 11.2 ± 0.1 a |
| Lysophosphatidylcholine | 11.4 ± 0.1 a | 11.0 ± 0.2 b |
1 Mean ± SD (n = 3). 2 Not identified.3 Values with different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p ˂ 0.05) using Duncan’s test.
Figure 1Fruits from V. agnus-castus L. (authors’ images). (a) Fruits from south-central region of Bulgaria. (b) Fruits from north-east region of Bulgaria.