| Literature DB >> 35406873 |
Rosa Martha Pérez Gutiérrez1, José Guadalupe Soto Contreras1, Felipe Fernando Martínez Jerónimo2, Mónica de la Luz Corea Téllez3, Raúl Borja-Urby4.
Abstract
Cinnamomum verum, Origanum majorana, and Origanum vulgare have been used in traditional medicine for a long time to treat diabetes because of their promising therapeutic effects. The combination of these plants (COO) was tested to improve their efficacy using selenium nanoparticles (Se-COO-NPs) and gum Arabic (GA) as stabilizers for sustained release. Phenolic compounds of plants were identified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). GA-Se-COO-NPs were characterized by spectroscopic and microscopic methods and evaluated in diabetic zebrafish. The ultraviolet spectrum was assessed to confirm the formation of plasmon resonance at 267 nm. The obtained particle size of selenium nanospheres was 65.76 nm. They were maintained in a stable form for 5 months at 4 °C. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images demonstrated the presence of individual spherical nanoparticles. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) showed the interaction between COO extract and selenium, exhibiting good entrapment efficiency (87%). The elemental analysis of COO extract and GA-COO-SeNPs confirmed that NPs were obtained. The zebrafish were exposed to a high glucose concentration for two weeks, and type 2 diabetes and oxidative stress responses were induced. In diabetic zebrafish, treatment with NPs showed antilipidemic and hypoglycemic effects, high survivability, and reduced levels of glucose, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and lipids in the blood. This group this had a higher survivorship rate than the diabetic control. The results demonstrated that GA-Se-COO-NPs have high antidiabetic potential, most likely because of the synergic effects of phenolic compounds and Se nanoparticles.Entities:
Keywords: green synthesis; polyherbal formulation; selenium nanoparticles; type 2 diabetes; zebrafish
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406873 PMCID: PMC9002390 DOI: 10.3390/plants11070893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1HPLC chromatogram of phenolic compounds of the hydroalcoholic extract. (A) Cinnamomum zeylanicum: (1) protocatechuic acid; (2) coumarin; (3) cinnamic acid; (4) vanillic acid; (5) p-coumaric acid; (6) caffeic acid; (7) rosmaric acid; (8) eugenol; (9) cinnamaldehyde. (B) Origanum majorana: (1) chlorogenic acid; (2) gallic acid; (3) pyrogallol; (4) resorcinol; (5) cinnamic acid; (6) carnosic acid; (7) syringic acid; (8) p-coumaric acid; (9) caffeic acid; (10) rosmarinic acid; (11) eugenol; (12) ferulic acid. (C) Origanum vulgare: (1) chlorogenic acid; (2) gentisic acid; (3) chicoric acid; (4) salvianolic acid B; (5) rosmarinic acid; (6) ferulic acid.
Identification and characterization of the polyphenols from Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Origanum majorana, and Origanum vulgare ssp. vulgare.
| Total Phenol Content 310.28 mg GAE 100 g−1 DW | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Characterization | |||
| Compound | RT min | λmax (nm) | [M+H]+ m/z (ESI-MS: positive ion) |
| Caffeic acid | 26.4 | 210, 240, 325 | 181, 163, 145, 135 |
| Cinnamic acid | 13.7 | 203, 215, 273 | 147, 125, 109 |
| Cinnamaldehyde | 41.3 | 241, 300 | 133, 132, 104, 103, 77, 61 |
| Coumarin | 15.4 | 275, 312 | 146, 128, 90, 63 |
| p-Coumaric acid | 20.4 | 212, 283 | 165, 147, 133, 119, 91 |
| Eugenol | 30.2 | 280 | 164, 149, 137, 131, 121 |
| Protocatechuic acid | 7.6 | 242, 294 | 154, 138, 109, 81 |
| Rosmarinic acid | 28.5 | 221, 291, 332 | 360, 319, 315, 193, 181, 175, 165 |
| Vanillic acid | 17.6 | 259, 252 | 312, 297, 282, 223, 193, 166, 151, 125, 107 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Compound | RT min | λmax (nm) | [M+H]+ m/z (ESI-MS: positive ion) |
| Caffeic acid | 26.4 | 210, 240, 325 | 181, 163, 145, 135 |
| Carnosic acid | 19 | 338 | 332, 330, 299, 281, 247, 229, 149 |
| Chlorogenic acid | 3.3 | 219, 241, 331 | 353, 191, 161 |
| Cinnamic acid | 13.7 | 203, 215, 273 | 147, 125, 109 |
| p-Coumaric acid | 20.4 | 212, 283 | 165, 147, 133, 119, 91 |
| Eugenol | 30.2 | 280 | 164, 149, 137, 131, 121 |
| Ferulic acid | 33.5 | 235,322 | 193, 177, 148, 133 |
| Gallic acid | 3.9 | 209, 266 | 170, 169, 153, 125 |
| Resorcinol | 5.4 | 273 | 111, 110, 81, 69, 64, 55 |
| Pyrogallol | 4.6 | 208, 266 | 126, 108, 97, 80, |
| Rosmarinic acid | 28.5 | 221, 291, 332 | 360, 319, 315, 193, 181, 175, 165 |
| Syringic acid | 19.2 | 275 | 198, 183, 127 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Compound | RT min | λmax (nm) | [M+H]+ m/z (ESI-MS: positive ion) |
| Chicoric acid | 18 | 311, 299, 179, 149, 135 | |
| Chlorogenic acid | 3.3 | 219, 241, 331 | 353, 191, 161 |
| Ferulic acid | 33.5 | 235,322 | 193, 177, 148, 133 |
| Gentisic acid | 3.9 | 241, 324 | 154, 136, 108, 80 |
| Rosmarinic acid | 28.5 | 221, 291, 332 | 360, 319, 315, 193, 181, 175, 165 |
| Salvianolic acid B | 23.6 | 260, 330 | 718, 519, 321 |
Scheme 1Synthesis reaction of Se nanoparticles.
Figure 2(A) Size distribution of SeNPs. (B) Size distribution of GA-COO-SeNPs.
Figure 3High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of SeNPs at 20 and 5 nm. (A) SeNPs derived from the COO depicting spherical nanoparticles (B) with bar scales of 20 and 10 nm.
Figure 4UV–Vis spectra of GA-COO-SeNPs, SeNPs, and COO extract.
Figure 5FTIR spectra of GA, H2Se2O3, COO, and GA-COO-SeNPs.
Figure 6Photographs of GA-COO-SeNPs over 175 days period of storage. The left sample was taken immediately after synthesis (day 0).
Figure 7Release profiles of COO extract from GA-COO-SeNPs at various pH levels (5.5, 7.4, and 9.0).
Figure 8EDX analyses of COO extract (A) and GA-COO-SeNPs (B).
Figure 9(A) Effect of NPs on the survival rates of zebrafish. The activity levels of antioxidant enzymes in the liver of zebrafish were experimentally induced to a diabetic condition, with and without NPs, (B) catalase (CAT), (C) superoxide dismutase (SOD), and (D) glutathione peroxidase (GPx). The green color indicates day 0, while yellow indicates day 14 after starting the experiment with a daily dose of 20 µg/L of a sample. Significant differences compared to the diabetic group: * p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; *** p > 0.05.
Effects of COO extract, SeNPs, and GA-COO-SeNPs on serum profiles of blood glucose, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels in adult zebrafish.
| Treatment Blood Glucose mg/dL Cholesterol mg/dL Triglycerides mg/dL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 61 ± 3.43 c | 99 ± 5.44 b | 71 ± 3.24 c |
| Diabetic group | 186 ± 5.21 | 285 ± 7.32 | 172 ± 4.62 |
| COO (10 µg/L) | 102 ± 4.77 a | 171 ± 6.08 c | 124 ± 1.68 b |
| COO (20 µg/L) | 83 ± 6.31 b | 159 ± 4.21 a | 101 ± 4.32 a |
| GA-SeNPs (10 µg/L) | 116 ± 4.32 a | 163 ± 3.86 c | 118 ± 2.58 a |
| GA-SeNPs (20 µg/L) | 99 ± 2.87 b | 151 ± 2.91 a | 100 ± 1.44 a |
| GA-COO-SeNPs (10 µg/L) | 69 ± 3.19 c | 107 ± 4.28 b | 80 ± 3.22 c |
| GA-COO-SeNPs (20 µg/L) | 54 ± 4.61 c | 97 ± 2.31 b | 75 ± 1.78 c |
| Metformin (25 mM) | 67 ± 2.39 c | 100 ± 3.32 b | 73 ± 2.99 c |
Values are averages ± SD. Polyherbal formulation (COV). a–c Differences of mean values vs. diabetic group: a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001.