| Literature DB >> 35406261 |
A M Radzi1, Sheikh Ahmad Zaki1, Mohamad Zaki Hassan2, R A Ilyas3,4, Khairur Rijal Jamaludin2, Mohd Yusof Md Daud2, Sa'ardin Abd Aziz2.
Abstract
Natural-fiber-reinforced composites, especially bamboo, are an alternative material to compete with conventional materials. Their environmentally friendly, renewable, low-cost, low-density, non-toxic, and fully biodegradable properties are concerning for researchers because of their advantages over synthetic polymers. This comprehensive review presents the results of work on bamboo fiber composites with special reference to bamboo types, thermoplastic and thermoset polymers matrices, hybrid composites, and their applications. In addition, several studies prove that these properties are very good and efficient in various applications. However, in the development of composite technology, bamboo fiber has certain constraints, especially in moisture conditions. Moisture is one of the factors that reduces the potential of bamboo fiber and makes it a critical issue in the manufacturing industry. Therefore, various efforts have been made to ensure that these properties are not affected by moisture by treating the surface fibers using chemical treatments.Entities:
Keywords: bamboo fibers; composites; hybrid; mechanical; thermal; thermoplastic; thermoset
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406261 PMCID: PMC9003382 DOI: 10.3390/polym14071387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Recently review studies in bamboo-based composites.
| Year | Reference | Remark | Processing Technique | Water | Tensile Strength | Flexural Strength | Impact Strength | Thermal Test | Hybrid Composites |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Kenan Song, Xiaofeng Ren and Longhe Zhang [ | Study on mechanical/thermal and characteristics performance | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| 2017 | Calvin Yap Thai Ming, Wong King Jye and Haris Ahmad Israr Ahmad [ | Study on mechanical performance | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| 2018 | Jan E.G. van Dam, H. Wolter Elbersen and Claudia M. Daza Montaño [ | Focus on the potential bamboo in biobased economy | √ | ||||||
| 2018 | Yıldızhan et al. [ | Study on the mechanical and chemical properties | √ | ||||||
| 2018 | S. A. H. Roslan, Z. A. Rasid and M. Z. Hassan [ | Study on fiber extraction and mechanical properties | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| 2018 | Pramudi et al. [ | Study on parameter and tensile behavior | √ | ||||||
| 2022 | Jawaid et al. [ | Investigated on bamboo- and kenaf-reinforced nanocomposites on mechanical and thermal performance | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Natural fibers production [43,44].
| Fiber | Annual Production (103 Tons) | Origin |
|---|---|---|
| Abaca | 70 | Leaf |
| Bamboo | 10,000 | Stem |
| Banana | 200 | Stem |
| Coir | 100 | Fruit |
| Cotton Lint | 18,500 | Stem |
| Flax | 810 | Stem |
| Hemp | 215 | Stem |
| Jute | 2500 | Stem |
| Kenaf | 770 | Stem |
| Ramie | 100 | Stem |
| Rice straw | Abundant | Fruit/grain |
| Wood | 1,750,000 | Stem |
Chemical composition of natural fibers [58,59,60].
| Fibers | Cellulose (wt.%) | Hemicellulose (wt.%) | Lignin (wt.%) | Waxes (wt.%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abaca | 56–63 | 20–25 | 12–131 | - |
| Bagasse | 55.2 | 16.8 | 25.3 | - |
| Bamboo | 26–43 | 30 | 21–31 | - |
| Banana | 63–64 | - | 5–11 | - |
| Coir | 32–43 | 0.15–0.25 | 40–45 | - |
| Cotton | 85–90 | 5.7 | - | 0.6 |
| Curaua | 7.36 | 9.9 | 7.5 | - |
| Flax | 71 | 18.6–20.6 | 2.2–20.6 | 1.5–1.7 |
| Hemp | 68–74 | 15–22.4 | 3.5–10 | 0.8 |
| Jute | 61–71.5 | 13.6–20.4 | 12–13 | 0.5 |
| Kenaf | 45–72 | 20.3–21.5 | 8–13 | - |
| Pineapple | 80.5 | 17.5 | 8.3 | - |
| Ramie | 68.6–76.2 | 13–16 | 0.6–0.7 | 0.3 |
| Sisal | 65–78 | 10–14 | 9.9–14 | 2 |
Natural and E-glass fibers properties [61,62].
| Fibers | Tensile (MPa) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) | Elongation at Break (%) | Density (g/cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abaca | 400 | 12 | 3–10 | 1.5 |
| Bagasse | 350 | 22 | 5.8 | 0.89 |
| Bamboo | 290 | 17 | - | 1.25 |
| Banana | 529–914 | 27–32 | 5.9 | 1.35 |
| Coir | 220 | 6 | 15–25 | 1.25 |
| Cotton | 400 | 11.8 | 3–10 | 1.51 |
| Curaua | 550–1150 | 11.8 | 3.7–4.3 | 1.4 |
| Flax | 800–1500 | 60–80 | 1.2–1.6 | 1.4 |
| Hemp | 550–900 | 70 | 1.6 | 1.48 |
| Jute | 410–780 | 26.5 | 1.9 | 1.48 |
| Kenaf | 930 | 53 | 1.6 | - |
| Pineapple | 413–1627 | 60–82 | 14.5 | 1.44 |
| Ramie | 500 | 44 | 2 | 1.5 |
| Sisal | 610–720 | 2–3 | 2–3 | 1.34 |
| E-glass | 2400 | 73 | 3 | 2.55 |
Figure 1Bamboo tree.
Figure 2Bamboo anatomy [36].
Figure 3Morphological characteristics of bamboo: (a) bamboo culm; (b) node diaphragm; (c) internode; (d) culm wall; and (e) vascular bundle [69].
Mechanical properties of bamboo species [70].
| Bamboo Species | Modulus of Rupture (MPa) | Modulus Elasticity (MPa) | Shear Strength (MPa) | Compression Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 99.8 | 4100 | 4.5 | 24 |
|
| 62.3 | 6100 | 4 | 25.3 |
|
| 122 | 1800 | 13.7 | 69 |
|
| 85.7 | 6300 | 5.4 | 31.5 |
|
| 52.4 | 4800 | 4.3 | 27 |
|
| 78.5 | 5100 | 4.8 | 40 |
|
| 100 | 1700 | 10 | 54.7 |
Bamboo-reinforced polymer thermoplastic composites and testing method.
| Bamboo | Polymer | Manufacturing Methods | Applied Testing Method | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flour | High-density | Twin screw extruders and injection molding | Static mechanical test, dynamic mechanical analyzer (DM), scanning electron microscope (SEM) | [ |
| Fiber | Polypropylene (PP) | Twin screw extruders and injection molding | Tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength, water absorption, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) | [ |
| Fiber | PP | Hot press | Tensile strength, SEM, and steam explosion technique | [ |
| Fiber | HDPE | Melt blending and hot press | Mechanical test and SEM | [ |
| Fiber | Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) | Hot–cool mixer, twin screw extruders, and hot press | Mechanical test | [ |
| Fiber | Polyethylene (PE) | Twin screw extruders | Mechanical test and thermal properties | [ |
| Fiber | PP | Two roll mill and hot press | Mechanical test, physical and SEM | [ |
Mechanical and physical properties of bamboo-reinforced thermoplastic polymer.
| Thermoplastic Matrix | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Flexural Strength (MPa) | Impact Strength (kJ/m) | Water Absorption (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDPE | 19–44.7 | 20–36 | 2.4–4.9 | 1.5–10 | [ |
| LDPE | 9.2–9.5 | 17.57 | 8.35 | - | [ |
| PP | 25.5–63 | 38.8–80 | 2.94–3.13 | 2.07–3.76 | [ |
| Polystrene | 25–69 | 27–29 | 1.14 | 2.79 | [ |
| PLA | 26–41.4 | 85 | 6 | - | [ |
TGA results for bamboo–HDPE composites and neat HDPE [85] (modified).
| Samples | T1on (°C) | Tmax (°C) | Residue at 600 °C (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 341.36 | 466.48 | 2.19 |
| 2 | 339.37 | 474.55 | 2.58 |
| 3 | 321.03 | 473.55 | 3.02 |
| 4 | 304.13 | 472.53 | 3.6 |
| 5 | 297.71 | 470.51 | 4.01 |
| 6 | 277.53 | 468.45 | 16.43 |
| Neat HDPE | 427.64 | - | 0.49 |
Thermoset Properties.
| Thermoset | Density (g/cm3) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Young Modulus (GPa) | Elongation (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epoxy | 1.1–1.4 | 35–90 | 2.1–6 | 1.9–3.5 | [ |
| Phenolic | 1.3 | 55–55 | 2.7–4.1 | - | [ |
| Polyester | 1.2–1.5 | 61–63 | 1–4 | 2.5–4.7 | [ |
| Polyimides | 1.46 | 120 | 3.5–4.5 | - | [ |
| Vinyl Ester | 1.2–1.4 | 80–120 | 2.9–11.9 | 3–5 | [ |
Common bamboo-reinforced thermoset polymer composites from the literature.
| Bamboo Type | Polymer Thermoset | Manufacturing Methods | Applied Testing Methods | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber | Epoxy | Resin transfer molding (RTM) | Tensile and flexural test, and hydrothermal ageing test | [ |
| Fiber | Epoxy | Hand layout | Mechanical test | [ |
| Fiber | Unsaturated polyester | Hand layout | Mechanical test | [ |
| Fiber | Epoxy | Hand layout | Flexural, quasi-static fracture toughness, thermal and FTIR test | [ |
| Powder | Epoxy | Hand layout | Thermal test | [ |
| Fiber | Polyester | Hand layout | Mechanical test | [ |
| Solid | Phenol–formaldehyde | Impregnation | Dynamic mechanical test (DMA), compression test, measurement of friction coefficient, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) | [ |
| Strips | Phenol–formaldehyde (PF) | Winding | Compression test | [ |
| Fiber | Polyester | Vacuum infusion | Fracture and tensile test | [ |
Mechanical and physical properties of bamboo-reinforced thermoset polymer.
| Thermoset | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Flexural Strength (MPa) | Impact Strength (kJ/m) | Water Absorption | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epoxy | 142.86–291.67 | 141.39–182.29 | - | 19 | [ |
| Phenolic | 114.4–354.78 | - | - | 7.98 | [ |
| Polyester | 98.4–191.3 | 50–128.5 | 5–20 | 4–12.05 | [ |
| Vinyl Ester | 48.06–119.39 | 106.81–161.58 | - | 6–14 | [ |
Bamboo-reinforced polymer hybrid composites and preparation methods.
| Hybrid | Resin | Method | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date palm | Epoxy | Hand layout technique | [ |
| Jute | Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) | Hotpress technique | [ |
| Jute | Vinyl ester | Hand layout technique | [ |
| Kenaf | Epoxy | Hand layout technique | [ |
| Pineapple leaf/coir fiber | Polyester | Hotpress technique | [ |
| Sisal | Polyester | Hand layout technique | [ |
| Sugarcane bagasse | Polyurethane (PU) foam | Hand layout and | [ |
| Carbon nanotubes (CNT) | Epoxy | Hand layout technique | [ |
| E-glass | Epoxy | Hand layout technique | [ |
| Glass | PP | Hotpress technique | [ |
Figure 4Challenges faced by bamboo composites worldwide.