| Literature DB >> 35406240 |
Hammad R Khalid1,2, Daeik Jang3, Nadir Abbas4, M Salman Haider5, Syed N A Bukhari6, Cyrus R Mirza7, Noureddine Elboughdiri4,8, Furqan Ahmad9.
Abstract
Highly flexible and stretchable sensors are becoming increasingly widespread due to their versatile applicability in human/robot monitoring sensors. Conductive polymeric composites have been regarded as potential candidates for such sensors, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are widely used to fabricate such composites. In the present study, CNT-embedded high flexible sensors were fabricated using a facile three-roll milling method, which mitigates the drawbacks of the conventional fabrication methods. CNTs content varied between 0.5 and 4.0 wt.%, and the percolation threshold range was obtained via conductivity/resistivity values of the fabricated sensors. Following this, the electrical stability of the sensors was examined against the various DC and AC signals. Furthermore, the fabricated sensors were stretched up to 500% strain, and their sensitivity against varying strain amplitudes was investigated in terms of the change in resistance and gauge factors. Lastly, the fabricated sensors were applied to human fingers for monitoring finger bending and releasing motions to validate their potential applications. The experimental results indicated that these sensors have a percolation threshold of around 2% CNTs content, and the sensors fabricated with 2 to 4% CNTs content showed measurable resistance changes against the applied strain amplitudes of 50-500%. Among these sensors, the sensor with 2% CNTs content showed the highest sensitivity in the studied strain range, exhibiting a resistance change and gauge factor of about 90% and 1.79 against 50% strain amplitude and about 18,500% and 37.07 against 500% strain amplitude, respectively. All these sensors also showed high sensitivity for finger motion detection, showing a resistance change of between 22 and 69%.Entities:
Keywords: carbon nanotubes; flexible sensor; functional composite; piezoresistive material; polymeric composite; stretchable senor; three-roll mill machine; wearable sensor
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406240 PMCID: PMC9002739 DOI: 10.3390/polym14071366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Details of CNT-embedded composite sensors.
| Designation | CNT (wt.%) | Silicone Polymer (g) | CNT (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C0.5 | 0.5 | 80 | 0.4 |
| C1 | 1 | 80 | 0.8 |
| C1.5 | 1.5 | 80 | 1.2 |
| C2 | 2 | 80 | 1.6 |
| C3 | 3 | 80 | 2.4 |
| C4 | 4 | 80 | 3.2 |
Figure 1Preparation of CNT-embedded sensors: (a) Schematic of mixture passing from three-roll milling machine; (b) prepared specimen.
Figure 2Prepared samples for resistivity measurement.
Figure 3Electrical conductivity and resistivity of the sensors fabricated with different CNTs content.
Figure 4Relationship between (a) electrical current and input voltage, and (b) electrical impedance and input frequency obtained in C2, C3, and C4 sensors.
Figure 5Cyclic loading vs. change in electrical resistance of sensors: (a) C1; (b) C1.5; (c) C2; (d) C3; (e) C4. Figures on right side are showing magnified images for lower strain levels.
Figure 6Relationship between the electrical resistance change and applied strain amplitudes.
Gauge factor of the sensors under the various applied strain amplitudes.
| Specimen | Applied Strain Amplitude (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50% | 100% | 200% | 300% | 400% | 500% | |
| C2 | 1.79 | 2.58 | 5.97 | 11.65 | 24.20 | 37.04 |
| C3 | 0.8 | 1.06 | 1.58 | 1.95 | 2.16 | 2.34 |
| C4 | 0.36 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.55 | 1.67 | 1.74 |
Figure 7Electrical resistance of composites upon finger bending: (a) C1.5; (b) C2; (c) C3; (d) C4.