| Literature DB >> 35406224 |
Xuehao Hu1,2, Yuhang Chen1,2, Shixin Gao3, Rui Min4, Getinet Woyessa5, Ole Bang5, Hang Qu1,2, Heng Wang3, Christophe Caucheteur6.
Abstract
We experimentally report fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) in a single mode step-index polymer optical fiber (POF) with a core made of TOPAS and cladding made of ZEONEX using 520 nm femtosecond pulses and a point-by-point (PbP) inscription method. With different pulse energies between 9.7 nJ and 11.2 nJ, 12 FBGs are distributed along the cores of two pieces of POFs with negative averaged effective index change up to ~6 × 10−4 in the TOPAS. For POF 1 with FBGs 1–6, the highest reflectivity 45.1% is obtained with a pulse energy of 10.6 nJ. After inscription, good grating stability is reported. Thanks to the post-annealing at 125 °C for 24 h, after cooling the grating reflectivity increases by ~10%. For POF 2 with FBGs 7–12, similar FBG data are obtained showing good reproducibility. Then, the FBGs are annealed at 125 °C for 78 h, and the average reflectivity of the FBGs during the annealing process increases by ~50% compared to that before the annealing, which could be potentially applied to humidity insensitive high temperature measurement.Entities:
Keywords: femtosecond laser; fiber Bragg gratings; micromachining; polymer optical fibers
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406224 PMCID: PMC9003215 DOI: 10.3390/polym14071350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Illustration of PbP FBG inscription set-up.
Data of distributed FBGs inscribed by the femtosecond laser at 520 nm.
| POF 1 | POF 2 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBG | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 9.7 | 10.0 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 10.9 | 11.2 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 10.9 | 11.2 | |
| 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 7.2 | |
| 24.5 | 24.8 | 25.1 | 25.4 | 25.7 | 25.95 | 24.5 | 24.8 | 25.1 | 25.4 | 25.7 | 25.95 | |
| 0.490 | 0.496 | 0.502 | 0.508 | 0.514 | 0.519 | 0.490 | 0.496 | 0.502 | 0.508 | 0.514 | 0.519 | |
| 1505.36 | 1523.70 | 1542.12 | 1560.46 | 1578.69 | 1593.84 | 1505.83 | 1524.32 | 1542.42 | 1560.69 | 1578.93 | 1594.30 | |
|
| 1.53608 | 1.53599 | 1.53597 | 1.53589 | 1.53569 | 1.53549 | 1.53656 | 1.53661 | 1.53627 | 1.53611 | 1.53592 | 1.53593 |
|
| ~0 | −0.00009 | −0.00011 | −0.00019 | −0.00039 | −0.00059 | ~0 | 0.00005 | −0.00029 | −0.00045 | −0.00064 | −0.00063 |
| OBIL (dB) | ~0 | 0.018 | 0.350 | 1.082 | 1.011 | 1.919 | ~0 | 0.141 | 0.034 | 0.902 | 1.523 | 1.880 |
| ~0 | 2.0 | 28.2 | 45.1 | 32.8 | 34.3 | ~0 | 12.9 | 43.5 | 48.3 | 52.8 | 30.9 | |
|
| ~0 | 0.39 | 1.38 | 1.06 | 0.42 | 0.29 | ~0 | 1.77 | 0.68 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 0.25 |
Figure 2Reflected spectra of distributed 2-mm-long FBGs 1–6 in POF 1 inscribed with an interval of 1 mm by the femtosecond laser at 520 nm.
Figure 3Insertion losses of FBGs 2–6 in POF 1 due to inscriptions by the femtosecond laser at 520 nm.
Figure 4Optical microscope images of distributed FBGs 2–6 in POF 1 inscribed by the femtosecond laser at 520 nm.
Figure 5The reflectivity evolutions of FBGs 3–6 in POF 1 during the 7 days after inscriptions.
Figure 6The reflectivity evolutions of FBGs 3–6 in POF 1 during the 7 days after post-annealing at 125 °C for 24 h.
Figure 7Reflected and transmitted amplitude spectra of 2-mm-long FBGs 3–6 in POF 1 in day 7 after fiber cooling.
Figure 8The Bragg wavelength evolutions of FBGs 9–12 in POF 2 during the annealing process at 125 °C for 78 h.
Figure 9The reflectivity evolutions of FBGs 9–12 in POF 2 during the annealing process at 125 °C for 78 h.
Figure 10Reflected and transmitted amplitude spectra of 2-mm-long FBGs 9–12 in POF 2 at room temperature after the post-annealing at 125 °C for 78 h.