| Literature DB >> 35406191 |
Yiren Pan1, Yi Pan1, Zhilin Wang1, Shuang Han1, Wenwen Han1, Huiguang Bian1.
Abstract
In the cracking process of waste tires, pyrolysis carbon black (CBp), as a solid product, accounts for about 35% of the total tire rubber content. Here, the treated CBp has been gradually applied to the tire formula to improve the recycling efficiency of waste tires. This study elucidated the influence of adding CBp during the tire mixing process on soft friction and metal wear. Compared with industrial carbon black (I-CB), the friction coefficient of CBp was smaller at different mixing stages, and the ripple caused by adhesion friction was not evident. After the modified CBp (M-CBp) was obtained by implementing the surface activation of common CBp (C-CBp), the friction coefficient between M-CBp and metal increased by 10%, while the filler dispersion and comprehensive mechanical properties showed an upward trend. The wear rate of metal was higher than that observed after adding I-CB during the same mixing mode; thus, it was necessary to strengthen the wear resistance of the inner-wall surface of the mixing chamber. The -OH group on the M-CBp surface can also participate in the silane coupling reaction and aggravate the metal wear of the mixer chamber wall. Through a comparison of results, the mixing friction coefficient can reflect the strength of filler-rubber interaction, which in turn can preliminarily represent the dispersion effect and comprehensive properties, reveal the reason behind the poor performance of CBp, and highlight the need for modification from the perspective of tribology.Entities:
Keywords: CBp; friction and wear; mixing process; surface activation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406191 PMCID: PMC9002387 DOI: 10.3390/polym14071319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Process of modified CBp.
Sample Formula (Unit: phr).
| Raw Material | A | B | C | D | E | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR9000 | 25.5 | 25.5 | 25.5 | 25.5 | 25.5 | 25.5 |
| RC2557S | 81.81 | 81.81 | 81.81 | 81.81 | 81.81 | 81.81 |
| TSR20 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| I-CB | 70 | / | / | 25 | / | / |
| C-CBp | / | 70 | / | / | 25 | / |
| M-CBp | / | / | 70 | / | / | 25 |
| Silica115MP | / | / | / | 45 | 45 | 45 |
| Si69mix | / | / | / | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| DPG | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| S | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CZ | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Others | Protection system: 3.5 phr; activation system: 4 phr | |||||
Figure 2Friction test mode.
Figure 3Friction coefficient between CBp and mixer chamber wall at different mixing stages.
Figure 4Comparison of friction coefficient curves and changes in the surface of CBp before and after the friction test at different mixing stages.
Figure 5Changes in the surface morphology and data curve representing the internal mixing chamber wall at different mixing stages.
Figure 6Crack growth process of mixer chamber wall.
Figure 7Mixing process and internal shape of the obtained rubber compound.
Figure 8SEM images of three kinds of carbon black.
Figure 9Friction coefficients after I-CB is replaced with two kinds of CBp.
Figure 10Comparison of Payne effect and silane coupling reaction.
Vulcanization test data.
| List | I-CB | C-CBp | M-CBp | I-CB/Silica | C-CBp/Silica | M-CBp/Silica |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ML/dNm | 2.42 | 2.42 | 2.38 | 3.33 | 3.74 | 3.56 |
| MH/dNm | 13.77 | 11.53 | 13.57 | 14.25 | 15.8 | 15.15 |
| MH-ML/dNm | 11.35 | 9.11 | 11.19 | 10.92 | 12.06 | 11.59 |
| TS2/min | 5.43 | 8.88 | 5.65 | 5.87 | 5.48 | 5.56 |
| T10/min | 4.27 | 7.51 | 4.56 | 1.67 | 1.86 | 1.74 |
| T50/min | 7.04 | 10.47 | 8.63 | 14.29 | 15.2 | 14.89 |
| T90/min | 12.87 | 15.7 | 14.34 | 28.07 | 33.38 | 29.45 |
| 100% Tensile Modulus/MPa | 3.84 | 3.65 | 3.58 | 3.51 | 3.68 | 3.71 |
| 300% Tensile Modulus/MPa | 8.11 | 4.64 | 7.13 | 5.26 | 5.35 | 5.32 |
| Tensile Strength/MPa | 15.89 | 6.79 | 20.82 | 17.38 | 13.82 | 18.56 |
| Abrasion/% | 0.127 | 0.325 | 0.130 | 0.116 | 0.2377 | 0.195 |
Figure 11Morphological changes in metal surface before and after friction.
Figure 12Data curve representing the morphology changes in metal surface before and after friction.