| Literature DB >> 35406173 |
Marlene Andrade-Guel1, Christian Cabello-Alvarado1,2, Carlos Alberto Avila-Orta1, Marissa Pérez-Alvarez1, Gregorio Cadenas-Pliego1, Pamela Yahaira Reyes-Rodríguez1, Leopoldo Rios-González3.
Abstract
Nowadays, highly flammable and harmful plastic materials are used in many daily applications. To prevent burning of materials, other harmful molecules or materials that are not environmentally friendly are added to plastics. To overcome this environmental issue, new materials have been investigated. Lignin, an industrial by-product, is an abundant biopolymer that can be used in fire safety plastics; it is considered a renewable and readily available resource. In this work, PP-TiO2/lignin composites were obtained with TiO2/lignin mixtures through the melt extrusion process, with different weight percentages of nanoparticles (10, 20, 25, and 30 wt.%). The PP-TiO2/lignin composites were characterized by XRD, FTIR, TGA, and SEM. Furthermore, cone calorimetry tests and the mechanical properties were evaluated. Cone calorimetry tests revealed that the introduction of 25 wt.% TiO2-lignin to the PP matrix reduced the peak of heat release rate (PHRR) and total heat release (THR) by 34.37% and 35.45%, respectively. The flame retardancy index (FRI) values of the composites were greater than 1.0 and were classified as good; the highest value of 1.93 was obtained in the PP-30 sample. The tensile tests demonstrated that the flexural modulus of the composites increased gradually with increasing lignin and TiO2 content, and the flexural strength decreased slightly. The use of lignin in PP composites can be an excellent alternative to synthesize new materials with improved flame-retardant properties and which is friendly to the environment.Entities:
Keywords: composite; green fire retardant; lignin; polypropylene; titanium dioxide
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406173 PMCID: PMC9002852 DOI: 10.3390/polym14071300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Identification of the PP/TiO2/lignin composites with different percentages of additives (10, 20, 25, and 30 wt.%).
| Sample Identification | PP Content | Weight of Additive (g) TiO2 | Weight of Additive (g) Lignin | Weight Percent of Additive (%) | Total Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP-0 | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300 |
| PP-10 | 270 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 300 |
| PP-20 | 240 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 300 |
| PP-25 | 225 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 300 |
| PP-30 | 210 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 300 |
Figure 1Screw mixing settings used during extrusion.
Figure 2X-ray diffraction patterns of the composites PP–TiO2/lignin (PP-20, PP-25, and PP-30), polypropylene (PP-0), and TiO2.
Figure 3FTIR spectra of composites of PP–TiO2/lignin (PP-10, PP-20, PP-25, and PP-30), polypropylene (PP.0), lignin, and TiO2.
Figure 4Thermograms of PP/TiO2/lignin composites obtained by extrusion.
Temperature at 50% weight loss and residue at 550 °C of the PP/TiO2/lignin composites.
| Sample | Temperature at 50% Weight Loss, | Residue at 550 °C (%) |
|---|---|---|
| PP-0 | 429 | 0 |
| PP-10 | 401 | 6 |
| PP-20 | 413 | 17 |
| PP-25 | 448 | 16 |
| PP-30 | 453 | 21 |
Figure 5Scanning electron micrographs of PP-0, PP-20, and PP-30 at 1000× and 4000×.
Figure 6Calorimetric measurements: (a) comparison of the peaks of the heat release rate (HRR) and (b) THR curves for the results.
Data of the cone calorimetry test of the samples analyzed.
| Sample | Peak HRR (kW/m2) | THR | Reduction % HRR | Reduction % THR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP-0 | 1260 ± 0.40 | 11.02 ± 0.72 | - | - |
| PP-10 | 1463 ± 0.67 | 109.0 ± 0.40 | 16.11 ± 0.42 | 2.68 ± 0.4 |
| PP-20 | 1041 ± 0.90 | 72.9 ± 0.50 | 17.39 ± 0.26 | 35.72 ± 0.2 |
| PP-25 | 827 ± 0.34 | 72.3 ± 0.30 | 34.37 ± 0.37 | 35.45 ± 0.2 |
| PP-30 | 853 ± 0.25 | 67.5 ± 0.12 | 32.31 ± 0.10 | 39.74 ± 0.6 |
Figure 7Digital photos of PP-0 and PP-30 after cone calorimeter measurements.
Flame retardancy index of PP/TiO2/lignin composites.
| Sample | Fire Retardancy Index |
|---|---|
| PP-10 | 0.87 |
| PP-20 | 1.45 |
| PP-25 | 1.76 |
| PP-30 | 1.93 |
Tensile and flexural properties of the composites.
| Sample | Tensile | Elongation at Break (%) | Flexural | Flexural |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP-0 | 24.7 ± 0.25 | 218 ± 1.2 | 42.2 ± 1.79 | 1.26 ± 4.7 |
| PP-10 | 20.8 ± 1.79 | 10.8 ± 0.2 | 39.4 ± 0.61 | 1.33 ± 1.6 |
| PP-20 | 18.2 ± 2.21 | 4.9 ± 2.5 | 36.4 ± 0.91 | 1.34 ± 2.5 |
| PP-25 | 13.7 ± 1.58 | 4.8 ± 4.12 | 33 ± 1.28 | 1.35 ± 3.0 |
| PP-30 | 12.7 ± 1.93 | 3.1 ± 2.36 | 39.6 ± 1.51 | 1.52 ± 4.8 |