Literature DB >> 35403968

Quantifying intraventricular drug delivery utilizing programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunts as the intraventricular access device.

Sheila S McThenia1, Neeta Pandit-Taskar2, Milan Grkovski3, Maria A Donzelli1, Safiatu Diagana1, Jeffrey P Greenfield4, Mark M Souweidane4, Kim Kramer5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunts (pVP shunts) are increasingly utilized for intraventricular chemotherapy, radioimmunotherapy, and/or cellular therapy. Shunt adjustments allow optimization of drug concentrations in the thecal space with minimization in the peritoneum. This report assesses the success of the pVP shunt as an access device for intraventricular therapies. Quantifying intrathecal drug delivery using scintigraphy by pVP shunt model has not been previously reported.
METHODS: We performed a single-institution, retrospective analysis on patients with CNS tumors and pVP shunts from 2003 to 2020, noting shunt model. pVP flow was evaluated for consideration of compartmental radioimmunotherapy (cRIT) using In-111-DTPA scintigraphy. Scintigraphy studies at 2-4 h and at 24 h quantified ventricular-thecal and peritoneal drug activity.
RESULTS: Twenty-two CSF flow studies were administered to 15 patients (N = 15) with diagnoses including medulloblastoma, metastatic neuroblastoma, pineoblastoma, and choroid plexus carcinoma. Six different types of pVP models were noted. 100% of the studies demonstrated ventriculo-thecal drug activity. 27% (6 of 22) of the studies had no peritoneal uptake visible by imaging. 73% (16 of 22) of the studies had minimal relative peritoneal uptake (< 12%). 27% (6 of 22) of the studies demonstrated moderate relative peritoneal uptake (12-37%). No studies demonstrated peritoneal uptake above 37%.
CONCLUSIONS: All patients had successful drug delivery of In-111-DTPA to the ventriculo-thecal space. 73% of the patients had minimal relative (< 12%) peritoneal drug uptake. Though efficacy varies by shunt model, low numbers preclude conclusions regarding model superiority. CSF flow scintigraphy studies assesses drug distribution of In-111-DTPA, informing CSF flow for delivery of intraventricular therapies.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain tumor; Drug delivery; Intraventricular; Peritoneal; Thecal; Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35403968     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-03989-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  7 in total

Review 1.  The blood-brain barrier: bottleneck in brain drug development.

Authors:  William M Pardridge
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-01

2.  Convection-enhanced delivery for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a single-centre, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial.

Authors:  Mark M Souweidane; Kim Kramer; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Zhiping Zhou; Sofia Haque; Pat Zanzonico; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Serge K Lyashchenko; Sunitha B Thakur; Maria Donzelli; Ryan S Turner; Jason S Lewis; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Steven M Larson; Ira J Dunkel
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Targeted radioimmunotherapy for embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes.

Authors:  Kayleen Bailey; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; John L Humm; Pat Zanzonico; Stephen Gilheeney; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Kim Kramer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Ali Gholamrezanezhad; Hossein Shooli; Narges Jokar; Reza Nemati; Majid Assadi
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-11-12

Review 5.  Evolving Drug Delivery Strategies to Overcome the Blood Brain Barrier.

Authors:  David S Hersh; Aniket S Wadajkar; Nathan Roberts; Jimena G Perez; Nina P Connolly; Victor Frenkel; Jeffrey A Winkles; Graeme F Woodworth; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 6.  Blood-Brain Barrier, Blood-Brain Tumor Barrier, and Fluorescence-Guided Neurosurgical Oncology: Delivering Optical Labels to Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Evgenii Belykh; Kurt V Shaffer; Chaoqun Lin; Vadim A Byvaltsev; Mark C Preul; Lukui Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Overcoming the Blood-Brain Barrier: Successes and Challenges in Developing Nanoparticle-Mediated Drug Delivery Systems for the Treatment of Brain Tumours.

Authors:  Chiara Ferraris; Roberta Cavalli; Pier Paolo Panciani; Luigi Battaglia
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-04-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.