Suha Arab1,2, Togas Tulandi3, William Buckett3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McGill University, 888 Boulevard de Maisonneuve East, suite # 200, Montreal, QC, H2l 4S8, Canada. suhaarab@gmail.com. 2. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. suhaarab@gmail.com. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McGill University, 888 Boulevard de Maisonneuve East, suite # 200, Montreal, QC, H2l 4S8, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of hereditary breast cancer associated with different mutated genes and to evaluate fertility preservation (FP) outcomes among young women with hereditary breast cancer when compared to non-hereditary breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women with breast cancer who underwent fertility preservation treatment at our academic fertility center between 2005 and 2019. We included all women with breast cancer aged < 40 years who had a genetic testing and underwent fertility preservation before starting gonadotoxic therapy (n = 132). Our objective was to evaluate the total number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes MII, embryos (where appropriate), cryopreserved oocytes, and/or embryos. RESULTS: Of 132 women with breast cancer, 40 women were found to be genetically positive (31.4%), 31 women of 40 (77.5%) had a BRCA mutation, 3 (7.5%) had ATM, 2 (5%) had CHK2, and one (2.5%) for each of the following genes: PALP2, NF, MUTYH.c.536A, and TP53. There was no significant difference between the groups in the total number of eggs retrieved and the number of MII oocytes and cryopreserved oocytes. The numbers of fertilized oocytes and cryopreserved embryos in the hereditary (n = 40) and non-hereditary (n = 92) group were (5.15 ± 6.6 vs 2.90 ± 4.2, P = 0.054) and (3.35 ± 3.7 vs 1.9 ± 2.8, P = 0.046) respectively. CONCLUSION: More than three quarters of positive mutated genes in women with breast cancer are BRCA mutations. Compared to those with non-hereditary breast cancer, women with hereditary breast cancer attained higher number of cryopreserved embryos.
PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of hereditary breast cancer associated with different mutated genes and to evaluate fertility preservation (FP) outcomes among young women with hereditary breast cancer when compared to non-hereditary breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women with breast cancer who underwent fertility preservation treatment at our academic fertility center between 2005 and 2019. We included all women with breast cancer aged < 40 years who had a genetic testing and underwent fertility preservation before starting gonadotoxic therapy (n = 132). Our objective was to evaluate the total number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes MII, embryos (where appropriate), cryopreserved oocytes, and/or embryos. RESULTS: Of 132 women with breast cancer, 40 women were found to be genetically positive (31.4%), 31 women of 40 (77.5%) had a BRCA mutation, 3 (7.5%) had ATM, 2 (5%) had CHK2, and one (2.5%) for each of the following genes: PALP2, NF, MUTYH.c.536A, and TP53. There was no significant difference between the groups in the total number of eggs retrieved and the number of MII oocytes and cryopreserved oocytes. The numbers of fertilized oocytes and cryopreserved embryos in the hereditary (n = 40) and non-hereditary (n = 92) group were (5.15 ± 6.6 vs 2.90 ± 4.2, P = 0.054) and (3.35 ± 3.7 vs 1.9 ± 2.8, P = 0.046) respectively. CONCLUSION: More than three quarters of positive mutated genes in women with breast cancer are BRCA mutations. Compared to those with non-hereditary breast cancer, women with hereditary breast cancer attained higher number of cryopreserved embryos.
Authors: Carol E DeSantis; Jiemin Ma; Mia M Gaudet; Lisa A Newman; Kimberly D Miller; Ann Goding Sauer; Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca L Siegel Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2019-10-02 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Devina K S McCray; Ashley B Simpson; Rebecca Flyckt; Yitian Liu; Colin O'Rourke; Joseph P Crowe; Stephen R Grobmyer; Halle C Moore; Stephanie A Valente Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Edward S Y Wong; Sandhya Shekar; Marie Met-Domestici; Claire Chan; Melody Sze; Yoon Sim Yap; Steven G Rozen; Min-Han Tan; Peter Ang; Joanne Ngeow; Ann S G Lee Journal: NPJ Genom Med Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 8.617