Background: We investigated whether contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) scores can predict lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC). Patients and Methods: We evaluated 75 patients who underwent US and CEUS. LPBC was defined as tissues with ≥50% stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) preoperatively. Characteristic US images predicting LPBC were evaluated using TIL-US scores via three ultrasonic tissue characteristics: Shape, internal echo level, and posterior echoes. TIL-CEUS was evaluated based on TIL-US plus CEUS. Results: TIL-US and TIL-CEUS cut-offs for predicting LPBC were 4 and 6 (area under the curve=0.93 and 0.96, respectively) points based on receiver operating characteristics curves. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values (95% confidence intervaI) were 0.94 (0.77-0.99), 0.75 (0.70-0.77), and 0.80 (0.72-0.82); and 0.94 (0.78-0.99), 0.86 (0.81-0.87), and 0.88 (0.80-0.90) for TIL-US and TIL-CEUS, respectively. TIL-CEUS score was a significant single predictor for LPBC in multivariate logistic regression (p=0.001). Conclusion: TIL-CEUS can be used for preoperative LPBC prediction and detection. Copyright 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research.
Background: We investigated whether contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) scores can predict lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC). Patients and Methods: We evaluated 75 patients who underwent US and CEUS. LPBC was defined as tissues with ≥50% stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) preoperatively. Characteristic US images predicting LPBC were evaluated using TIL-US scores via three ultrasonic tissue characteristics: Shape, internal echo level, and posterior echoes. TIL-CEUS was evaluated based on TIL-US plus CEUS. Results: TIL-US and TIL-CEUS cut-offs for predicting LPBC were 4 and 6 (area under the curve=0.93 and 0.96, respectively) points based on receiver operating characteristics curves. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values (95% confidence intervaI) were 0.94 (0.77-0.99), 0.75 (0.70-0.77), and 0.80 (0.72-0.82); and 0.94 (0.78-0.99), 0.86 (0.81-0.87), and 0.88 (0.80-0.90) for TIL-US and TIL-CEUS, respectively. TIL-CEUS score was a significant single predictor for LPBC in multivariate logistic regression (p=0.001). Conclusion: TIL-CEUS can be used for preoperative LPBC prediction and detection. Copyright 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; ascending slope; contrastenhanced ultrasound; lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer; tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes; ultrasonography
Authors: R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Carsten Denkert; Stephan Wienert; Audrey Poterie; Sibylle Loibl; Jan Budczies; Sunil Badve; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Anita Bane; Shahinaz Bedri; Jane Brock; Ewa Chmielik; Matthias Christgen; Cecile Colpaert; Sandra Demaria; Gert Van den Eynden; Giuseppe Floris; Stephen B Fox; Dongxia Gao; Barbara Ingold Heppner; S Rim Kim; Zuzana Kos; Hans H Kreipe; Sunil R Lakhani; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Giancarlo Pruneri; Nina Radosevic-Robin; David L Rimm; Stuart J Schnitt; Bruno V Sinn; Peter Sinn; Nicolas Sirtaine; Sandra A O'Toole; Giuseppe Viale; Koen Van de Vijver; Roland de Wind; Gunter von Minckwitz; Frederick Klauschen; Michael Untch; Peter A Fasching; Toralf Reimer; Karen Willard-Gallo; Stefan Michiels; Sherene Loi; Roberto Salgado Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Edith A Perez; Karla V Ballman; Kathy S Tenner; E Aubrey Thompson; Sunil S Badve; Helen Bailey; Frederick L Baehner Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Carsten Denkert; Gunter von Minckwitz; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Bianca Lederer; Barbara I Heppner; Karsten E Weber; Jan Budczies; Jens Huober; Frederick Klauschen; Jenny Furlanetto; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Thomas Karn; Berit M Pfitzner; Sherko Kümmel; Knut Engels; Andreas Schneeweiss; Arndt Hartmann; Aurelia Noske; Peter A Fasching; Christian Jackisch; Marion van Mackelenbergh; Peter Sinn; Christian Schem; Claus Hanusch; Michael Untch; Sibylle Loibl Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Igino Simonetti; Federico Bruno; Roberta Fusco; Carmen Cutolo; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Renato Patrone; Carlo Masciocchi; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Francesco Arrigoni; Carmine Picone; Andrea Belli; Roberta Grassi; Francesca Grassi; Antonio Barile; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo; Vincenza Granata Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-07-16