Jingmei Yang1, Xinglong Ju2,3, Feng Liu4, Onur Asan4, Timothy Church5, Jeff Smith5. 1. Division of System EngineeringBoston University Boston MA 02246 USA. 2. Price College of BusinessUniversity of Oklahoma Norman OK 73019 USA. 3. School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringCornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA. 4. School of Systems and EnterprisesStevens Institute of Technology Hoboken NJ 07030 USA. 5. Catapult Health Inc. Dallas TX 75254 USA.
Abstract
Objective: Chronic diseases have become the most prevalent and costly health conditions in the healthcare industry, deteriorating the quality of life, adversely affecting the work productivity, and costing astounding medical resources. However, few studies have been conducted on the predictive analysis of multiple chronic conditions (MCC) based on the working population. Results: Seven machine learning algorithms are used to support the decision making of healthcare practitioner on the risk of MCC. The models were developed and validated using checkup data from 451,425 working population collected by the healthcare providers. Our result shows that all proposed models achieved satisfactory performance, with the AUC values ranging from 0.826 to 0.850. Among the seven predictive models, the gradient boosting tree model outperformed other models, achieving an AUC of 0.850. Conclusions: Our risk prediction model shows great promise in automating real-time diagnosis, supporting healthcare practitioners to target high-risk individuals efficiently, and helping healthcare practitioners tailor proactive strategies to prevent the onset or delay the progression of the chronic diseases.
Objective: Chronic diseases have become the most prevalent and costly health conditions in the healthcare industry, deteriorating the quality of life, adversely affecting the work productivity, and costing astounding medical resources. However, few studies have been conducted on the predictive analysis of multiple chronic conditions (MCC) based on the working population. Results: Seven machine learning algorithms are used to support the decision making of healthcare practitioner on the risk of MCC. The models were developed and validated using checkup data from 451,425 working population collected by the healthcare providers. Our result shows that all proposed models achieved satisfactory performance, with the AUC values ranging from 0.826 to 0.850. Among the seven predictive models, the gradient boosting tree model outperformed other models, achieving an AUC of 0.850. Conclusions: Our risk prediction model shows great promise in automating real-time diagnosis, supporting healthcare practitioners to target high-risk individuals efficiently, and helping healthcare practitioners tailor proactive strategies to prevent the onset or delay the progression of the chronic diseases.
Entities:
Keywords:
Multiple chronic conditions; health informatics; machine learning; predictive analysis
Authors: Romana Pylypchuk; Sue Wells; Andrew Kerr; Katrina Poppe; Tania Riddell; Matire Harwood; Dan Exeter; Suneela Mehta; Corina Grey; Billy P Wu; Patricia Metcalf; Jim Warren; Jeff Harrison; Roger Marshall; Rod Jackson Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ramon Casanova; Santiago Saldana; Sean L Simpson; Mary E Lacy; Angela R Subauste; Chad Blackshear; Lynne Wagenknecht; Alain G Bertoni Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eric Yuk Fai Wan; Daniel Yee Tak Fong; Colman Siu Cheung Fung; Esther Yee Tak Yu; Weng Yee Chin; Anca Ka Chun Chan; Cindy Lo Kuen Lam Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Janice L Clarke; Scott Bourn; Alexis Skoufalos; Eric H Beck; Daniel J Castillo Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Chengyin Ye; Tianyun Fu; Shiying Hao; Doff McElhinney; Xuefeng Ling; Yan Zhang; Oliver Wang; Bo Jin; Minjie Xia; Modi Liu; Xin Zhou; Qian Wu; Yanting Guo; Chunqing Zhu; Yu-Ming Li; Devore S Culver; Shaun T Alfreds; Frank Stearns; Karl G Sylvester; Eric Widen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 5.428