| Literature DB >> 35402717 |
Pankaj Gupta1, Pratyaksha Rana1, Balaji Ganeshan2, Daneshwari Kalage1, Santosh Irrinki1, Vikas Gupta1, Thakur Deen Yadav1, Rajender Kumar1, Chandan K Das1, Parikshaa Gupta1, Raymond Endozo2, Ritambhra Nada1, Radhika Srinivasan1, Naveen Kalra1, Usha Dutta1, Manavjit Sandhu1.
Abstract
Aim of the study: To investigate computed tomography (CT) texture parameters in suspected gallbladder cancer (GBC) and assess its utility in predicting histopathological grade and overall survival. Material and methods: This retrospective pilot study included consecutive patients with clinically suspected GBC. CT images, clinical, and histological or cytological data were retrieved from the database. CT images were reviewed by two radiologists. A single axial CT section in the portal venous phase was selected for texture analysis. Radiomic feature extraction was done using commercially available research software.Entities:
Keywords: CT texture analysis; cancer; gallbladder; histology; radiomics
Year: 2021 PMID: 35402717 PMCID: PMC8977886 DOI: 10.5114/ceh.2021.111173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Hepatol ISSN: 2392-1099
Fig. 1Contrast enhanced axial CT image of a female patient with pathologically proven gallbladder cancer with texture features. A) CT image showing region of interest drawn around tumour (blue line) and corresponding images of fine, medium, and coarse textures. B) Histogram derived from image showing pixel distribution at filter value of 2 mm. C) Table of texture parameters across the different SSF values: 0 – conventional, 2 mm – fine texture scale, 3-5 mm – medium texture scales, and 6 mm – coarse texture scale
Fig. 2Flowchart of patient recruitment
Fig. 3Morphological types of gallbladder cancer. Axial contrast CT images depict asymmetric gallbladder wall thickening at fundus with associated exophytic mass in segment IV of liver (A, white arrow), heterogenous intraluminal polypoidal lesion ~ 2.5 cm in maximum dimension (B, white arrow) and heterogenous attenuation mass in gallbladder fossa with gallbladder not separately visualized (C, white arrow). D shows heterogenous exophytic mass with multiple calcific foci within (white arrow). All the above lesions were pathologically proven adenocarcinoma with good differentiation (B), moderate differentiation (C) and not otherwise specified (A, D), respectively, histological grades. Note is made of a periportal lymph node (arrowhead), with a CBD stent anterior to it (A)
Baseline imaging characteristics
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Morphological type of involvement | 38 |
| Exophytic mass with or without gallbladder wall thickening | 22 (58) |
| Intraluminal polypoidal mass with or without gallbladder wall thickening | 12 (31.5) |
| Mass replacing the normal gallbladder | 4 (10.5) |
| Gallstones | 10 (26.3) |
| Discrete liver lesions | 5 |
| Metastasis | 1 |
| Cholangitis abscess | 1 |
| Simple cysts | 2 |
| Indeterminate | 1 |
| Biliary dilatation | 24 (63) |
| Ascites | 6 |
| Ascites with omental nodules | 2 |
| Indeterminate | 4 |
| Omental or peritoneal nodules | 3 |
| Abdominal lymphadenopathy | |
| Periportal lymphadenopathy (> 1 cm in SAD) | 17 |
| Retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (> 1 cm in SAD) | 7 |
SAD – short axis dimension
Histological type and grade of 29 patients with pathologically proven gallbladder malignancy
| Histological type and grade | |
|---|---|
| Adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified | 18 (62) |
| Adenocarcinoma, well differentiated | 1 (3.5) |
| Adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated | 7 (24) |
| Adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated | 2 (7) |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 1 (3.5) |
Average values of CT texture parameters
| Spatial scale filter (SSF) values | Mean intensity | SD | Entropy | MPP | Skewness | Kurtosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 64.376842 | 21.555000 | 4.316842 | 65.208421 | –0.447105 | 1.240263 |
| 2 | 6.123158 | 47.771842 | 5.030263 | 38.889474 | –0.092895 | 1.509737 |
| 3 | 9.362632 | 48.975000 | 5.056579 | 41.924474 | –0.064737 | 1.058947 |
| 4 | 12.035263 | 51.917895 | 5.108158 | 46.515000 | –0.076842 | 0.579737 |
| 5 | 14.145526 | 54.694474 | 5.152105 | 50.707369 | –0.071053 | 0.219211 |
| 6 | 15.615000 | 56.775000 | 5.185263 | 54.005789 | –0.057368 | 0.002632 |
Fig. 4Boxplots showing the trends in the mean value at SSF3 and 4 (A, B) and kurtosis at SSF4 and 5 (C, D)
Fig. 5Kaplan-Meier curves showing significant difference in overall survival for (A) kurtosis at SSF = 4 and (B) kurtosis at SSF = 5