| Literature DB >> 35402384 |
Mimi Fan1,2, Zhihui Pan1, Chunjuan Wang2, Yang Guo2, Jingran Sun1, Mingzhu Liu1, Bo Peng2, Jin Wu1, Yanjun Fang1.
Abstract
A novel ratiometric fluorescence probe based on nitrogen-doped blue carbon dots (NCDs) and red gold nanoclusters (Au NCs) for mercuric ion (Hg2+) has been prepared and characterized. A user friendly fluorescent test paper based sensor combined with smartphone was fabricated for rapid visual and quantitative detection. Hg2+ can specifically bind to Au+ on the surface of Au NCs, leading to the quench of red fluorescence while the fluorescence intensity of the NCDs with blue fluorescence remained unchanged as a internal standard signal. The implement of paper-based sensor address some common drawback in analytical process such as the detection time, analysis cost. In a further demonstration, a homemade detection device with smartphone was used to qualify the Hg2+. After adding different concentration of Hg2+, red, purple, and blue colors were obtained on the detection zones of the fluorescent test paper. The Android App Color Grab was used to identify the red, green and blue (RGB) values of fluorescent color. The rapid visual and quantitative detection of Hg2+ was accomplished with the detection limit of 2.7 nM for fluorescence, 25 nM for smartphone and 32 nM for paper strip. The developed multi-mode detection platform was successfully applied to the detection of mercury ions in water samples with acceptable recoveries. The NCDs and Au NCs probe facilitate the one-site environmental monitoring for Hg2+ with "naked-eye" and smartphone.Entities:
Keywords: fluorescent probe; gold nanoclusters; mercury ion; paper-based sensor; visual quantitative detection
Year: 2022 PMID: 35402384 PMCID: PMC8990869 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.859379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
SCHEME 1Schematic diagram of the formation principle and visualization of the ratio fluorescent probe for the detection of Hg2+.
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of the paper-based sensor design.
FIGURE 2(A) Fluorescence spectra of the ratiometric fluorescent probes with the addition of Hg2+. The ratio of fluorescence intensity of NCDs to Au NCs is 1:1. The inset shows the corresponding fluorescence photographs taken under a 365 nm UV lamp. (B) Linear plot of the ratio of I464/I662 versus Hg2+ concentration.
Comparison of the current probe with reported fluorescent probes.
| Sensing systems | Year | Liner range (nM) | LOD (nM) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCDs/RCDs | 2018 | 0–320 | 0.14 |
|
| DTT/C-Au NCs | 2018 | 50–1000 | 8.7 |
|
| CDs/CDs | 2019 | 1–1000 | 0.22 |
|
| DNA/Au NPs | 2020 | 50–2000 | 10 |
|
| CDs/BSA-Au NCs | 2018 | 1–100 | 1.85 |
|
| CDs/Au NCs | 2018 | 2–15 | 0.73 |
|
| C-dots/Au NCs | 2016 | 0–500 | 28 |
|
| NCDs/Au NCs | 2021 | 50–2500 | 2.7 | This work |
FIGURE 3(A) Schematic drawing of the detection of Hg2+ using a smartphone; RGB analysis of the generated images via a color recognizer application; (B,C) detection of Hg2+ by the fluorescence probe solution combined with a smartphone.
FIGURE 4(A) The schematic diagram of visual and quantitative detection of mercury ions by the paper-based sensor platform; (B) smart phone recognition paper-based sensor detection of mercury ions and data (C).
FIGURE 5(A) Schematic diagram of the selective responses of the ratio fluorescent probe solutions to metal ions; (B) The corresponding fluorescence photos; (C) The histogram shows the selective responses of the fluorescence intensity (I464/I662) of the probe solutions to different metal cations, samples marked 1–17 represent 1. Blank, 2. Na+, 3. K+, 4. Ca2+, 5. Ni2+, 6. Co2+, 7. Cd2+, 8. Ba2+, 9. Fe3+, 10. Zn2+, 11. Cr3+, 12. Al3+, 13. Ag+, 14. Mg2+, 15. Pb2+, 16. Cu2+, 17. Hg2+; (D) The anti-interference performance of the ratio fluorescent probes; (A) without any addition of metal ions. (B) The addition of 25 μM of metal cations mentioned above together. (C) A subsequent addition of 2.5 μM Hg2+ in (B).
The rate of recovery of Hg2+ in water samples (Using luminescence spectrometer).
| Spiked Concentration (μM) | Tap water | Yellow River water | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Found (μM, | Recovery (%, | RSD (%, | Found (μM, | Recovery (%, | RSD (%, | |
| 0.5 | 0.48 | 96.0 | 2.9 | 0.47 | 94.0 | 2.2 |
| 1.2 | 1.24 | 103.3 | 3.1 | 1.29 | 107.6 | 5.1 |
| 1.6 | 1.71 | 106.9 | 4.2 | 1.57 | 98.1 | 3.9 |
| 2.0 | 2.09 | 104.5 | 2.7 | 1.81 | 90.5 | 3.1 |