| Literature DB >> 35402369 |
Yanling Ren1,2, Tao Wang1,2, Yingjie Jiang2, Ding Chen3, Wenyu Zuo4, Jianjun Guo1, Daochao Jin1.
Abstract
Tobacco beetle (Lasioderma serricorne (F.)) is one of the main storage pests that harm tobacco leaves. The current control methods mainly include physical control, chemical control, and biological control, but they all have their own disadvantages. In this study, 22 kinds of plant essential oils in grapefruit, peppermint, juniper, eucalyptus, myrrh, lemon grass, geranium, tea tree, cypress, citronella, patchouli, benzoin, rosemary, cinnamon, clary sage, bergamot, mastic, ginger, rose hydrosol, cedar, thyme, and basil, respectively, are selected to explore their behavioral responses against L. serricorne adults using a glass Y-tube olfactometer. The behavioral responses results show that 17 kinds of essential oils in eucalyptus, basil, grapefruit, cypress, mastic, peppermint, patchouli, juniper, geranium, thyme, benzoin, lemon grass, cinnamon, ginger, rosemary, clary sage, and citronella can avoid L. serricorne adults, while five kinds of essential oils in tea tree, rose hydrosol, myrrh, bergamot, and cedar can attract L. serricorne adults. Especially, essential oils in eucalyptus and grapefruit can avoid L. serricorne adults at 1 μl/L with the repellent rates of 94.67 and 94.56%, respectively. Meanwhile, 17 kinds of essential oils which can avoid L. serricorne adults are selected to determine their fumigation activity against L. serricorne adults using the Erlenmeyer flask test method, and bioassay results show that after 72 h of treatment, five kinds of plant essential oils in rosemary, eucalyptus, basil, citronella, and geranium show excellent fumigation activity against L. serricorne adults with the mortality rates of 100.00, 95.29, 95.29, 94.12, and 91.76%, respectively, and their LD50 of the contact activity against L. serricorne adults determined using the leaf-dipping method are 3.60, 3.49, 8.90, 6.70, and 7.80 μl/L, respectively. Our results show that plant essential oils could be developed as environmentally friendly insect control agents.Entities:
Keywords: Lasioderma serricorne (F.); behavioral response; contact activity; fumigation activity; plant essential oils
Year: 2022 PMID: 35402369 PMCID: PMC8988062 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.880608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
FIGURE 1Behavioral response of 22 plant essential oils against L. serricorne adults. Different uppercase letters represented in the figure indicate a significant difference through LSD among different plant essential oils against L. serricorne adults. PR (%), repellent rate (Mean ± SE).
Fumigation activity of 17 kinds of plant essential oils against L. serricorne adults at 15 μl/L.
| Essential oil | Fumigation activity (mean ± SE) (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| 48 h | 72 h | |
| Rosemary | 40.00 ± 1.92 C | 100.00 A |
| Eucalyptus | 53.33 ± 1.92 B | 95.29 ± 3.11 A |
| Basil | 25.56 ± 1.11 D | 95.29 ± 11.77 A |
| Citronella | 74.44 ± 4.84 A | 94.12 ± 2.35 A |
| Geranium | 77.78 ± 2.94 A | 91.76 ± 31.13 A |
| Thyme | 40.00 ± 3.85 C | 76.47 ± 3.11 B |
| Clary sage | 27.78 ± 1.11 D | 71.76 ± 4.08 B |
| Cinnamon | 31.11 ± 1.11 D | 51.76 ± 1.18 C |
| Juniper | 11.11 ± 1.11 E | 47.06 ± 5.39 C |
| Grapefruit | 8.89 ± 1.11 EF | 36.47 ± 3.53 D |
| Ginger | 11.11 ± 1.11 E | 22.35 ± 2.04 E |
| Patchouli | 0 G | 21.17 ± 2.35 E |
| Peppermint | 0 G | 18.82 ± 2.03 E |
| Benzoin | 0 G | 9.41 ± 2.35 F |
| Lemon grass | 3.33 ± 1.92 FG | 7.05 ± 1.18 F |
| Mastic | 11.11 ± 1.11 E | 5.88 ± 1.18 F |
| Cypress | 0 G | 5.88 ± 1.18 F |
Different uppercase letters indicate the fumigation activity against L. serricorne adults of the plant essential oils with a significant difference through LSD.
Contact activity of five kinds of plant essential oils against L. serricorne adults.
| Essential oil | Contact activity (mean ± SE) (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 μl/L | 1 μl/L | 2.5 μl/L | 5 μl/L | 10 μl/L | 15 μl/L | 20 μl/L | 40 μl/L | |
| Rosemary | 5.35 ± 1.79 E | 10.71 ± 1.79 D | 39.28 ± 1.79 C | 69.64 ± 1.79 B | 100.00 A | - | - | - |
| Eucalyptus | 7.14 ± 3.57 E | 42.86 ± 1.79 D | - | 71.43 ± 1.79 C | 89.29 ± 0.03 B | 100.00 A | - | - |
| Basil | - | 10.71 ± 1.79 D | - | 41.07 ± 3.09 C | 51.78 ± 6.19 B | 80.36 ± 1.79 A | 89.29 ± 0.01 A | - |
| Citronella | - | 7.14 ± 1.79 D | - | 48.21 ± 3.57 C | 58.93 ± 3.57 C | - | 73.21 ± 5.36 B | 92.86 ± 1.79 A |
| Geranium | - | 12.5 ± 3.57 E | - | 41.07 ± 3.09 D | 64.28 ± 1.79 C | 82.14 ± 3.57 B | 94.64 ± 3.09 A | - |
Different uppercase letters indicate the contact activity against L. serricorne adults of the plant essential oils with a significant difference through LSD.
The LD50 values of the contact activity against L. serricorne adults of the tested plant essential oils.
| Treatment | Toxic regression equation | Chi-Square | LD50 (mean ±95% confidence limit) (μl/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rosemary | y = -1.639 + 0.456x | 0.23 | 3.60 (1.26–83.63) |
| Eucalyptus | y = -0.812 + 0.233x | 1.04 | 3.49 (-10.18–14.68) |
| Basil | y = -1.094 + 0.123x | 0.39 | 8.90 (-16.40–22.12) |
| Citronella | y = -1.372 + 0.721x | 0.36 | 6.70 (0.01–35.58) |
| Geranium | y = -1.072 + 0.138x | 0.39 | 7.80 (-12.20–16.82) |
| Pirimiphos-methyl | y = -0.651 + 0.042x | 3.15 | 15.45 (-7.05–34.27) |
| Chlorantraniliprole | y = -2.033 + 0.003x | 3.91 | 249.77 (305.02–689.48) |