| Literature DB >> 35402245 |
Gang Chen1, Guojin Jia1, Fan Chao1, Feng Xie2, Yue Zhang2, Chuansheng Hou1, Yong Huang2, Haoran Tang2, Jianjun Yu2, Jihong Zhang3, Shidong Jia2, Guoxiong Xu3.
Abstract
Objective: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignant tumors, accounting for 20% of total tumors ranked first in males. PCa is usually asymptomatic at the early stage and the specificity of the current biomarkers for the detection of PCa is low. The present study evaluates circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood or urine, which can be used as biomarkers of PCa and the combination of these markers may increase the sensitivity and specificity of the detection of PCa.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; circulating tumor DNA; liquid biopsy; mutation allele frequency; prostate cancer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35402245 PMCID: PMC8984469 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.759791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Correlation between No. of mutations and clinicopathological characteristics of the PCa patients.
| Characteristic | No. of variants< 2 (n=19) | No. of variants≥ 2 (n=14) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis, mean ± SD | 77.14 ± 6.70 | 78.00 ± 6.62 | 0.7249 |
| PSA, median (range) | 56.0 (5.04-3327.0) | 103.1 (10.37-6132.0) | 0.4160 |
| History of radiotherapy | 0.8230 | ||
| Yes, n (%) | 1 (5.3) | 1 (7.1) | |
| No, n (%) | 18 (94.7) | 13 (92.9) | |
| Castration-resistant | 0.4791 | ||
| Yes, n (%) | 2 (10.5) | 1 (7.1) | |
| No, n (%) | 17 (89.5) | 12 (85.7) | |
| Unknown, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (7.1) | |
| Grade group, n (%) | 0.9136 | ||
| 1, n (%) | 2 (10.5) | 1 (7.1) | |
| 2, n (%) | 2 (10.5) | 2 (14.3) | |
| 3, n (%) | 2 (10.5) | 2 (14.3) | |
| 4, n (%) | 2 (10.5) | 3 (21.4) | |
| 5, n (%) | 6 (31.6) | 4 (28.6) | |
| Unknown, n (%) | 5 (26.3) | 2 (14.3) | |
| T stage, n (%) | 0.6693 | ||
| cT1, n (%) | 6 (31.6) | 2 (14.3) | |
| cT2, n (%) | 7 (36.8) | 5 (35.7) | |
| cT3, n (%) | 2 (10.5) | 3 (21.4) | |
| cT4, n (%) | 3 (15.8) | 2 (14.3) | |
| cTx, n (%) | 1 (5.3) | 2 (14.3) | |
| N stage, n (%) | 0.9162 | ||
| N0, n (%) | 12 (63.2) | 9 (64.3) | |
| N1, n (%) | 2 (10.5) | 2 (14.3) | |
| Nx, n (%) | 5 (26.3) | 3 (21.4) | |
| M stage, n (%) |
| ||
| M0, n (%) | 16 (84.2) | 7 (50.0) | |
| M1, n (%) | 3 (15.8) | 7 (50.0) | |
| Stage group, n (%) | 0.3035 | ||
| I, n (%) | 1 (5.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
| II, n (%) | 2 (10.5) | 2 (14.3) | |
| III, n (%) | 8 (42.1) | 2 (14.3) | |
| IV, n (%) | 5 (26.3) | 8 (57.1) | |
| Unknown, n (%) | 3 (15.8) | 2 (14.3) | |
| Treatment naïve, n (%) | 0.3174 | ||
| Yes, n (%) | 7 (36.8) | 7 (50.0) | |
| No, n (%) | 12 (63.2) | 6 (42.9) | |
| Unknown, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (7.1) |
Contingency tables were analyzed using the chi-square test. Numerous data chosen from the normal population were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Numerous data that were not chosen from the normal population were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. The bold value indicates a statistical significance. T, primary tumor; N, regional lymph node metastasis; M, distant metastasis.
Figure 1Plasma cfDNA mutation profiles and association of the number of mutations detected in plasma cfDNA and clinical characteristics of prostate cancer. (A) cfDNA mutation profile of prostate cancer and prostatic hyperplasia. Blue color indicates mutation and red color indicates hotspot mutation which is defined as a mutation with occurrence greater than 20 in the COSMIC database. (B) The number of mutations in prostate cancer and prostatic hyperplasia. (C) Mutation allele frequencies in prostate cancer and hyperplasia. (D) Association of the number of mutation and metastatic status. p-value was calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test. (E) Association of the number of mutations and tumor stage. P-value was calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis test. (F) Association of the number of mutations and treatment naïve status. P-value was calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test. (G) Association of the number of mutations and PSA. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the corresponding P-value are shown. (H) Association of the number of mutations and Gleason score. P-value was calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis test. (I) Association of the number of mutations and age. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the corresponding p-value are shown. Each dot indicates one sample.
Figure 2Association of PSA and clinical characteristics of prostate cancer. (A) PSA in prostate cancer and prostatic hyperplasia. P-value was calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test. (B) Association of PSA and metastatic status. P-value was calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test. (C) Association of PSA and treatment naïve status. p-value was calculated by Mann-Whitney U test. (D) Association of PSA and Gleason score. P-value was calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis test. (E) Association of PSA and tumor stage. P-value was calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis test. (F) Association of PSA and age. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the corresponding P-value are shown. Each dot indicates one sample.
Figure 3Detection of gene mutation prevalence in plasma cfDNA samples. The plasma spectrum of alterations in this study was almost identical and correlated with tissue samples in the MSK-IMPACT Clinical Sequence Cohort of prostate cancer (37 vs. 504 samples).
Figure 4Dynamic changes of mutation allele frequencies in plasma samples during treatment. (A) Plasma samples from the case #1 patient. (B) Plasma samples from the case #2 patient. The baseline indicates plasma samples collected from the patient before treatment.
Figure 5Association of mutation allele frequency (MAF) detected in urine cfDNA and clinical characteristics of prostate cancer. Each dot indicates one sample. (A) Association of MAF and metastasis status. P-value was calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test. (B) Association of MAF and treatment naïve status. P-value was calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test. (C) Association of MAF and Gleason score. P-value was calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis test. (D) Association of MAF and tumor stage. P-value was calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis test. (E) Association of MAF and PSA. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the corresponding P-value are shown. (F) Association of MAF and age. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the corresponding P-value are shown. Each dot indicates one sample.
Figure 6Comparison of cfDNA between urine and plasma. (A) Mutation landscape of urine (left) and plasma (right) samples from patients with prostate cancer. Some genes with only one mutation were not shown in the figure. (B) Mutation allele frequencies detected in paired urine and plasma samples from patients with prostate cancer. (C) Mutation allele frequencies of matched mutations detected in paired urine and plasma samples. (D) The landscape of mutations in urine and plasma samples from patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).