| Literature DB >> 35401837 |
Cui Liu1, Qiuyun Chen1, Yinghui Shang2, Lechuang Chen3, Jay Myers4, Amad Awadallah5, Jinger Sun1, Shuiliang Yu1, Katharine Umphred-Wilson1, Danian Che1, Yingtong Dou1, Luoyi Li1, Pamela Wearsch1, Diana Ramírez-Bergeron6, Rose Beck1,5, Wei Xin1,5, Ge Jin3, Stanley Adoro1, Lan Zhou1,5.
Abstract
The endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response (UPR) is a conserved adaptive signaling in ER homeostasis and has emerged as critical in highly proliferating cells and potential treatment target for acute T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL).Entities:
Keywords: JAG1; PERK; T-ALL; UPR; Vascular niche
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35401837 PMCID: PMC8965499 DOI: 10.7150/thno.67710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.600
Figure 1T-ALL Development Induced Up-regulation of JAG1 and Down-regulation of SCF and CXCL12 in ECs. (A-B) Representative FACS profile of bone marrow ECs (Lin-TER119-CD31+) and EC-expressing JAG1 (A). Frequency of bone marrow CD31+ ECs and mean MFI of JAG1 determined from 4 similar experiments (B). (C) Representative whole-mount imaging of CD31/CD144+ bone marrow vasculature in the control WT and ICN1 mice (left panel). Dilated small arteries and coalesced vessels were highlighted by arrows and dotted circles, respectively. Right panels plot the changes in CD31/CD144 volume (%) by whole-mount imaging. (D) Representative EC (CD45-TER119-CD31+) expression of CXCL12 by FACS analysis in control mice or in ICN1 leukemia mice. Mean MFIs were calculated from 4 similar experiments. (E) BMECs were co-cultured with control or ICN1 cells (1.5 X106) for 24h. qRT-PCR of EC expressions of transcripts were standardized for beta-actin and expressed as fold changes relative to those in EC co-cultured with control marrow cells (n=6/group from 2 experiments). (F) Representative western blot (left) with anti-JAG1 of BMECs co-cultured with control or ICN1 cells. Quantification of JAG1 expression normalized to β-actin from 3 similar experiments (right). Data shown in A, B, C (right), D-F are mean ± SD (n=3-6/group from 2-4 experiments). Student t test was performed; *p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
Figure 2PERK-eIF2a-ATF4 Activation induced in ECs by ICN1 is Necessary for JAG1 Up-regulation. (A-B) BMECs were co-cultured with control or ICN1 cells (1.5 X106) for 24h in the presence or absence (GSK control medium) of the PERK inhibitor GSK2606414 (GSK; 1 µM). Representative western blots using antibodies targeting PERK (3192; Cell signaling), p-eIF2α (3398; Cell signaling), total eIF2α (9722; Cell signaling), JAG1 (70109; Cell signaling), DLL4 (21584-1-AP; Proteintech), and β-actin are shown from three similar experiments. Activated phosphor-PERK (upper) and total PERK (lower) indicated by arrow heads. (C) Quantification of PERK, p-eIF2a, JAG1 and DLL4 expression normalized to β-actin (right). (D-E) Representative EC (CD45-TER119-CD31+) expression of p-eIF2α (D) and ATF4 (E) by FACS analysis in control mice or leukemia mice with ICN1 T-ALL of 3 similar experiments. Data shown in MFI (D-E) were mean ± SD (n=4). Student t test was performed; *p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
Figure 3ATF4 Regulates JAG1 While JAG1 Regulates Angiocrine Factor Expression. (A-B) ChIP analysis with control rabbit IgG (ctrl IgG) and anti-ATF4 show JAG1 promoter region contains one CRE site approximately 0.6 kb upstream that was bound by ATF4 more in EC cells (MS1) exposed to ICN1 than in ECs exposed to WT bone marrow cells. (C-E) ATF4 over-expressing (C), ATF4 knockdown (D-E), or JAG1 knockdown (F-G) ECs were co-cultured with ICN1 cells (1.5 X106) for 24h. qRT-PCR of transcripts were standardized for beta-actin and expressed as fold changes relative to those in ECs transfected with control siRNA or pcDNA plasmid (n=6/group from 2 experiments) (D & F). siRNA knockdown efficiencies and down-regulation of JAG1 after ATF4 knockdown were shown by western blots (E & G). (H) Representative FACS profile of apoptotic ICN1 cells co-cultured with ECs expressing control or JAG1 siRNA from 3 similar experiments. Data shown in right are mean percentage of apoptotic WT or ICN1 cells co-cultured with ECs expressing control or JAG1 siRNA (n=4). Data shown in B-H are mean ± SD. Student t test was performed; *p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
Figure 4Targeting Endothelial PERK Increased HSPC Frequency and Induced Leukemia Cell Apoptosis. (A) Comparison of spleen sizes between WT mice (left top), ICN1control mice (PERKF/F), and ICN1-developing VE-cadherinERT2-Cre/PERKF/F mice (PERK-delpeted; PERK ko) mice (left bottom). Representative FACS profile of bone marrow GFP+ cells showing leukemia burden in PERKF/F and PERK ko mice (right) from 3 experiments. (B) Kaplan-Myer survival curves of control leukemia mice (PERKF/F) (n=22) and ICN1-developing PERK knockout (PERK ko) (n=26) (pooled from 3 experiments). Mantel-Cox test was performed. p<0.0001. (C) Representative FACS profile of apoptotic annexin+ leukemia cells by gating on GFP+ cells in the marrow from 3 similar experiments. Means of apoptotic cells in control leukemia mice (PERKF/F) (n=9) and ICN1-developing PERK knockout mice (PERK ko) (n=10) were shown on the right. (D) Representative FACS profile of GFP-LSK and plots of frequencies in control leukemia mice (PERKF/F) (n=9) and ICN1-developing PERK knockout mice (PERK ko) (n=10) on day 14 after receiving primary leukemia cells. Data were pooled from 3 similar experiments. (E) Representative whole-mount imaging of CD31+ vasculatures and plots of CD31/CD144 volume (%) in PERKF/F and PERK ko mice from 3 similar experiments. (F) Plots of apoptotic annexin+ ECs (CD45-TER119-CD31+) in control leukemia mice (PERKF/F) (n=8) and ICN1-developing PERK ko mice (n=8) on day 14 after receiving primary leukemia cells (top). (G) qRT-PCR of VEGFα expression in ECs co-cultured with ICN1 cells in the absence (ctrl) and the presence of PERK inhibitor (PERK inh) (n=6/group from 2 experiments). Data shown in C-F were mean ± SD. Student t test was performed; *p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
Figure 5Leukemia SEVs Induced PERK-dependent JAG1 Up-regulation. Analysis of plasma-derived SEVs from control (WT) and ICN1 leukemia mice by electron microscopy imaging (A), nanoparticle analysis (B), and western blots of exosome markers (C). (D) CFSE-labeled SEVs were cultured with BMEC cells. Representative FACS profiles from 3 similar experiments showing CFSE signal when co-cultured with the SEV-depleted plasma (ctrl), CFSE-labeled ICN1 SEV (EV) (40 X108/ml), or CFSE-labeled ICN1 SEVs together with CD (EV + CD). (E) Representative blots from 3 similar experiments of BMECs lysates after cultured for 24 h with whole plasma (total), concentrated exosomes isolated from plasma (conc) (40 X108/ml), and exosome-depleted plasma (depl) collected from WT mice ICN1 mice peripheral blood. Activated phosphor-PERK (upper) and total PERK (lower) are indicated by the arrow heads. (F) Quantification of PERK, p-eIF2a, ATF4, and JAG1 expression normalized to β-actin. (G) Representative blots of BMECs lysates after cultured for 24h with concentrated exosomes isolated from WT mice or ICN1 mice in the absence or the presence of CD (5 µg/ml). (H) Quantification of p-eIF2a, ATF4, and JAG1 expression normalized to β-actin. Data shown in D was mean ± SD (n=3). Student t test was performed; *p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
Figure 6Endothelial PERK Activation and JAG1 Over-expression in Human T-ALL. (A) NSG mice were IV injected with PBS (ctrl) or engrafted with human DND41 cells in 3 independent experiments. Marrow leukemia burden was determined by the expression of human CD45 (hCD45). Representative FACS profiles of host p-PERK and JAG1 in control mouse or DND41-engrafted mouse ECs (hCD45-). (B) Representative western blots of MS1 cells after being cultured with DND41 leukemia cells in the presence or the absence of CD from 3 similar experiments. (C) Quantification of PERK, p-eIF2a, ATF4, and JAG1 expression normalized to β-actin. (D) IHC staining of PERK, p-eIF2α, and JAG1(arrows) in human bone marrow tissues from two non-neoplastic (ctrl) or T-ALL cases. Images were taken under 200X magnification. Data shown in A are mean ± SD (n=5 from 3 experiments). Student t test was performed; *p<0.05; ** p<0.01.