| Literature DB >> 35401836 |
Zuoxiu Xiao1,2, Qiong Huang3,4, Yuqi Yang3,4, Min Liu3,4, Qiaohui Chen1,2, Jia Huang1,2, Yuting Xiang1,2, Xingyu Long1,2, Tianjiao Zhao1,2, Xiaoyuan Wang1,2, Xiaoyu Zhu5, Shiqi Tu1,2, Kelong Ai1,2.
Abstract
Many factors such as trauma and COVID-19 cause acute kidney injury (AKI). Late AKI have a very high incidence and mortality rate. Early diagnosis of AKI provides a critical therapeutic time window for AKI treatment to prevent progression to chronic renal failure. However, the current clinical detection based on creatinine and urine output isn't effective in diagnosing early AKI. In recent years, the early diagnosis of AKI has made great progress with the advancement of information technology, nanotechnology, and biomedicine. These emerging methods are mainly divided into two aspects: First, predicting AKI through models construct by machine learning; Second, early diagnosis of AKI through detection of newly-discovered early biomarkers. Currently, these methods have shown great potential and become an attractive tool for the early diagnosis of AKI. Therefore, it is very important to discuss and summarize these methods for the early diagnosis of AKI. In this review, we first systematically summarize the application of machine learning in AKI prediction algorithms and specific scenarios. In addition, we introduce the key role of early biomarkers in the progress of AKI, and then comprehensively summarize the application of emerging detection technologies for early AKI. Finally, we discuss current challenges and prospects of machine learning and biomarker detection. The review is expected to provide new insights for early diagnosis of AKI, and provided important inspiration for the design of early diagnosis of other major diseases. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Early diagnosis.; Machine learning; Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; Reactive oxygen species and nitrogen species; kidney injury molecule-1; miRNA-21; γ-glutamyl transpeptidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35401836 PMCID: PMC8965497 DOI: 10.7150/thno.71064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.600
Machine learning related concepts involved in this article
| Concepts | Introduction |
|---|---|
| Linear regression | A simple algorithm for regression task which expects a hyperplane to fit the dataset (a straight line when there are only two variables) |
| Generalized additive model | A method of constructing a non-monotonic response model within the framework of a linear or logistic regression model (or any other generalized linear model) |
| Decision Tree | A simple but widely used classifier for classifying unknown data by building decision trees from training data |
| Support vector machine | Transform classification problem into the problem of finding the classification plane and the classification is achieved by maximizing the distance between the boundary points of the classification and the classification plane |
| Logistic regression | Deal with binary classification problems where the dependent variable is a categorical variable |
| Gradient boosting decison tree | The purpose is to learn a series of weak classifiers or basic classifiers from the training data, and then combine them into a strong classifier |
| Neural networks | Abstract the human brain neuron network from the perspective of information processing, establish a certain simple model, and form different networks according to different connection methods |
| Random forest | Integrated algorithm composed of many decision trees |
| Genetic algorithm | A computational model of searching for the optimal solution by simulating the natural selection and genetic mechanism of Darwin's biological evolution theory |
| Deep Taylor decomposition | A method to explain the prediction results of the neural network to the individual; The result it produces is the decomposition of the function expressed by the neural network on the input variables |
| Principal component analysis | Analyze the data to identify patterns and find patterns to reduce the dimensionality of the data set while minimizing information loss |
| Shap | An interpretation technique based on the Shap value of each feature; A positive Shap value indicates that the feature causes a higher risk of disease, while a negative Shap value is the opposite |
Methods of machine learning to predict AKI
| Category | Modeling method | Dataset source | Limitations | Optimal AUC | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative AKI Risk Prediction | RF | The University of Florida Health Integrated Data Repository | Single-center study; no clear definition of features | 0.88 |
|
| LR | The hospital database, electronic records, chart review and the catheterization reports in the Erasmus Medical Center | Single-center study; urine output was not considered when defining AKI. | 0.79 |
| |
| AKI Prediction During Surgery | SVM,LR, | The preoperative assessment record, anesthesia record and EHR | Single-center study; ignoring some key features | 0.85 |
|
| LR, | Electronic medical records and records on intraoperative variables at Far Eastern Memorial Hospital | Single-center research; manual input of features; data imbalance | 0.84 |
| |
| DNN | Perioperative Data Warehouse | Single-center study; loss of creatinine value caused lots of cases to be lost. | 0.792 |
| |
| Postoperative AKI Real-time Prediction | RNN | EHR at a tertiary care center for cardiovascular diseases | The observation period for patients varies in length. | 0.90 |
|
| Intensive Care Unit AKI Prediction | RF | The Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care Data Mart | Unbalanced data sources; AKI was not manually reviewed; Incomplete AKI definition | 0.88 |
|
| RF | The EPaNIC multicenter randomized clinical trial database | NGAL is only measured in the verification queue | 0.84 |
| |
| Integrated classification learning | the PICU and CTICU of three | Urine volume standards were not considered when defining AKI; patients with uremia were not excluded. | 0.89 |
| |
| AKI Prediction in All Hospital Wards | RNN | The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs clinical database | representative cases are uneven | 0.92 |
|
| GBDT | The Clinical Research Data Warehouse at the University of Chicago | Urine volume standards were not considered in the definition of AKI; baseline SCR was inaccurate | 0.90 |
| |
| LR | The Yale-New Haven Health System | The drug dose is not considered in the drug variables. | 0.81 |
| |
| Interpretable AKI Prediction Model | TCN | HER of all | the definition of AKI need improvement | 0.88 |
|
| Cross-site Transportability Model for AKI Prediction | GBDT | EHR data from a source healthcare system | baseline SCR is inaccurate;miss the key variables of heart rate, blood oxygen saturation and Braden scale score | 0.92 |
|
Methods of biomarkers detection for early diagnosis of AKI
| Category | Probe/Method name | Target biomarker | Advantages | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Near-infrared fluorescence imaging probe | NIR-O2.- | O2.- | It is the first near-infrared fluorescent O2.- probe in AKI detection. |
|
| MRP1-3 | caspase-3, NAG,O2.- | HPβCD enhance its renal clearance rate |
| |
| TA-TPABQ | H2O2 | raw nano-material enhance its renal clearance rate |
| |
| KNP-1 | ONOO- | good renal targeting |
| |
| KTP5-ICG-GNP | ROS | Realize long-term monitoring of renal dysfunction |
| |
| Naph-O2.- | O2.- | Imaging depth up to 130μm |
| |
| MUR1-3 | GGT,AAP,NAG | multiple optical analysis improve accuracy |
| |
| Chemiluminescence Imaging Probe | MRPD | O2.- | Dual channel detection is more reliable |
|
| NCR1 | O2.- | Higher resolution and less optical signal loss |
| |
| NCR2 | ONOO- | Higher resolution and less optical signal loss |
| |
| Photoacoustic Molecular Imaging Probe | FDOCl-22 | HOCl | high renal clearance rate and deep imaging depth |
|
| SiRho-HD | ONOO- | self-calibrate and eliminate interference. |
| |
| FPRR | GGT | High imaging depth |
| |
| Electrochemical immunosensor | Peptide-mediated sensor | NGAL | Good stability and short analysis time |
|
| Aptamer-mediated sensor | NGAL | Good stability and short analysis time; reusable |
| |
| Homogeneous electrochemiluminescence biosensor | miRNA-21 | high sensitivity |
| |
| Surface plasmon resonance biosensor | Refreshable nanobiosensor | NGAL | Good stability, reusable |
|
| Surface enhanced raman spectroscopy | SERS specific immunoassay | NGAL | Different molecular forms of NGAL can be distinguished |
|
| Fluorescence immunoassay | Flamma675- CNRRRA | KIM-1 |
| |
| Nanoflare sensor | Spherical nucleic acid-based mRNA nanoflares | KIM-1 | Direct detection of mRNA, earlier diagnosis |
|
| Point-of-Care Testing | PGM | miRNA-21 | Real-time monitoring, portable |
|