| Literature DB >> 35401272 |
Min Li1, Wen-Jing Zhu2, Qing Luo3, Huang Chen4, Yan Duan5, Hong-Zhen Xie6.
Abstract
Background: As a special patient group, stroke patients have a significant attachment to humanistic care. However, multiple problems remain in clinical practice. Medical staff in stroke wards are the primary providers of humanistic care. Finding out the opinions of the staff that provide these medical services is vitally important for stroke patients that need access to curative and humanistic care. Objective: The aim of the study is to explore the psychological experiences of doctors, nurses, and physiotherapists during the implementation of humanistic care in stroke wards. Method: This is a qualitative phenomenological study. Medical staff (i.e., doctors, nurses, and physiotherapists) were selected from stroke wards in general hospitals (minimum level two) from 13 cities within six provinces in China. A purposive sampling method was used until saturation (n = 18). Face-to-face or video call semi-structured interviews were conducted by using a phenomenological research method. The average interview length was 60 min (range 30-90 min). The Colaizzi seven-step method was used for analysis.Entities:
Keywords: humanistic care; nursing humanistic care; physiological experience; qualitative research; stroke; stroke ward
Year: 2022 PMID: 35401272 PMCID: PMC8989731 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.791993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Interview questions.
|
| |
|---|---|
| 1 | What's your opinion on the current implementation of the humanistic care in stroke ward? |
| 2 | How do you feel about the humanistic care implemented by the stroke department? |
| 3 | What are the obstacles of the implementation of the humanistic care in the stroke ward? How do you manage those difficulties? |
| 4 | What strategies can help to improve the level of humanistic care in stoke ward? |
Characteristic of participants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a1 | M | 36 | Master | Huizhou, GD | 8 | Advanced | 3rd |
| a2 | M | 35 | Bachelor | Heshan, GD | 12 | Advanced | 2nd |
| a3 | M | 31 | Master | Guangzhou, GD | 4 | Junior | 3rd |
| a4 | M | 33 | Bachelor | Zhanjiang, GD | 9 | Intermediate | 3rd |
| a5 | F | 32 | Doctor | Guangzhou, GD | 5 | Intermediate | 3rd |
| b1 | F | 38 | College | Panzhihua, SC | 19 | Intermediate | 3rd |
| b2 | F | 39 | Bachelor | Zengcheng, GD | 15 | Intermediate | 3rd |
| b3 | F | 38 | College | Maoming, GD | 17 | Intermediate | 2nd |
| b4 | F | 46 | College | Guangzhou, GD | 24 | Intermediate | 3rd |
| b5 | F | 30 | Bachelor | Bengbu, AH | 10 | Junior | 3rd |
| b6 | F | 28 | Bachelor | Suzhou, AH | 7 | Junior | 3rd |
| b7 | F | 29 | Bachelor | Nanning, GX | 7 | Junior | 3rd |
| b8 | F | 33 | Doctor | Guangzhou, GD | 6 | Advanced | 3rd |
| c1 | F | 35 | Master | Guangzhou, GD | 16 | Intermediate | 3rd |
| c2 | M | 32 | Bachelor | Shenzhen, GD | 13 | Intermediate | 3rd |
| c3 | M | 33 | Bachelor | Yinchuan, NX | 8 | Intermediate | 3rd |
| c4 | F | 48 | Bachelor | Guangzhou, GD | 28 | Advanced | 3rd |
| c5 | M | 28 | Bachelor | Ganzhou, JX | 5 | Junior | 3rd |
M, Male; F, Female.
GD, Guangdong Province; SC, Sichuan Province; AH, Anhui Province; GX, Guangxi Province.
3rd, 3rd level hospital; 2nd, 2nd level hospital.
Summary of themes, coding words, and meaningful units.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gradually improving the perception of humanistic caring in stroke ward | Changes in concept of treatment | Stroke ward | a1, Doctor |
| Green channel of stroke | a5, Doctor | ||
| High quality of nursing care | b1, Nurse | ||
| Respect for human rights | b3, Nurse | ||
| Spirituality concern | b4, Nurse | ||
| Solve patients' problem | Dysphagia treatment | b1, Nurse | |
| Pay for patients' care | b8, Nurse | ||
| Deal with severe constipation and urinary retention | c2, Physiotherapist | ||
| c4, Physiotherapist | |||
| Initiatively create caring atmosphere | Comfort in holiday | a1, Doctor | |
| Build communication platform | b7, Nurse | ||
| Interaction of medical workers and patients | c2, Physiotherapist | ||
| Required improvement of consciousness and ability of humanistic care implementors in stroke ward | Weak professional value | Distraction of self-emotion on work | b8, Nurse |
| Disengagement of work | c4, Physiotherapist | ||
| Insufficient voluntary caring behavior in stroke ward | Neglect of coma patients' care | a3, Doctor | |
| Perfunctory education | b5, Nurse | ||
| Indifferent care attitude | c5, Physiotherapist | ||
| Inadequate attention and capacity on whole-process rehabilitation | Lacking early rehabilitation | b1, Nurse | |
| Indifferent to rehabilitation | b3, Nurse | ||
| Lack of comprehensive skills | a2, Doctor | ||
| b2, Nurse | |||
| b7, Nurse | |||
| Main problems and contradiction in implementing humanistic care in stroke wards | Contradiction between reality and demand in management of medical institution | Unbalance allocation of human resource | b1, Nurse |
| Unreasonable work flows | b3, Nurse | ||
| Conflict between principle and flexibility in management | b5, Nurse | ||
| Disparity between rehabilitation conditions and patients' need | Tight amount of beds | a2, Doctor | |
| Incomplete rehabilitation medical construction | c2 Physiotherapist | ||
| Critical need of staff in stroke ward | Additional position setup | Necessary position of psychological consultation | c1 Physiotherapist |
| Position of physiotherapists | b6, Nurse | ||
| Effective practical training of humanistic care | Cases and experiences of humanistic care | a4, Doctor | |
| Training does not fit the reality | b1, Nurse | ||
| Ambiguous content of care | b5, Nurse | ||
| Build a more harmonious relationship between patients and doctors | Rigid cognitive | a1, Doctor | |
| b5, Nurse | |||
| Poor compliance | a2, Doctor | ||
| Lack of trust | c3, Physiotherapist |