Lake Magadi, East African Rift Valley, is a hyperalkaline and saline soda lake highly enriched in Na+, K+, CO3 2-, Cl-, HCO3 -, and SiO2 and depleted in Ca2+ and Mg2+, where thick evaporite deposits and siliceous sediments have been forming for 100 000 years. The hydrogeochemistry and the evaporite deposits of soda lakes are subjects of growing interest in paleoclimatology, astrobiology, and planetary sciences. In Lake Magadi, different hydrates of sodium carbonate/bicarbonate and other saline minerals precipitate. The precipitation sequence of these minerals is a key for understanding the hydrochemical evolution, the paleoenvironmental conditions of ancient evaporite deposits, and industrial crystallization. However, accurate determination of the precipitation sequence of these minerals was challenging due to the dependency of the different hydrates on temperature, water activity, pH and pCO2, which could induce phase transformation and secondary mineral precipitation during sample handling. Here, we report a comprehensive methodology applied for monitoring the evaporitic mineral precipitation and hydrochemical evolution of Lake Magadi. Evaporation and mineral precipitations were monitored by using in situ video microscopy and synchrotron X-ray diffraction of acoustically levitated droplets. The mineral patterns were characterized by ex situ Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. Experiments were coupled with thermodynamic models to understand the evaporation and precipitation-driven hydrochemical evolution of brines. Our results closely reproduced the mineral assemblages, patterns, and textural relations observed in the natural setting. Alkaline earth carbonates and fluorite were predicted to precipitate first followed by siliceous sediments. Among the salts, dendritic and acicular trona precipitate first via fractional crystallization-reminiscent of grasslike trona layers of Lake Magadi. Halite/villiaumite, thermonatrite, and sylvite precipitate sequentially after trona from residual brines depleted in HCO3 -. The precipitation of these minerals between trona crystals resembles the precipitation process observed in the interstitial brines of the trona layers. Thermonatrite precipitation began after trona equilibrated with the residual brines due to the absence of excess CO2 input. We have shown that evaporation and mineral precipitation are the major drivers for the formation of hyperalkaline, saline, and SiO2-rich brines. The discrepancy between predicted and actual sulfate and phosphate ion concentrations implies the biological cycling of these ions. The combination of different in situ and ex situ methods and modeling is key to understanding the mineral phases, precipitation sequences, and textural relations of modern and ancient evaporite deposits. The synergy of these methods could be applicable in industrial crystallization and natural brines to reconstruct the hydrogeochemical and hydroclimatic conditions of soda lakes, evaporite settings, and potentially soda oceans of early Earth and extraterrestrial planets.
Lake Magadi, East African Rift Valley, is a hyperalkaline and saline soda lake highly enriched in Na+, K+, CO3 2-, Cl-, HCO3 -, and SiO2 and depleted in Ca2+ and Mg2+, where thick evaporite deposits and siliceous sediments have been forming for 100 000 years. The hydrogeochemistry and the evaporite deposits of soda lakes are subjects of growing interest in paleoclimatology, astrobiology, and planetary sciences. In Lake Magadi, different hydrates of sodium carbonate/bicarbonate and other saline minerals precipitate. The precipitation sequence of these minerals is a key for understanding the hydrochemical evolution, the paleoenvironmental conditions of ancient evaporite deposits, and industrial crystallization. However, accurate determination of the precipitation sequence of these minerals was challenging due to the dependency of the different hydrates on temperature, water activity, pH and pCO2, which could induce phase transformation and secondary mineral precipitation during sample handling. Here, we report a comprehensive methodology applied for monitoring the evaporitic mineral precipitation and hydrochemical evolution of Lake Magadi. Evaporation and mineral precipitations were monitored by using in situ video microscopy and synchrotron X-ray diffraction of acoustically levitated droplets. The mineral patterns were characterized by ex situ Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. Experiments were coupled with thermodynamic models to understand the evaporation and precipitation-driven hydrochemical evolution of brines. Our results closely reproduced the mineral assemblages, patterns, and textural relations observed in the natural setting. Alkaline earth carbonates and fluorite were predicted to precipitate first followed by siliceous sediments. Among the salts, dendritic and acicular trona precipitate first via fractional crystallization-reminiscent of grasslike trona layers of Lake Magadi. Halite/villiaumite, thermonatrite, and sylvite precipitate sequentially after trona from residual brines depleted in HCO3 -. The precipitation of these minerals between trona crystals resembles the precipitation process observed in the interstitial brines of the trona layers. Thermonatrite precipitation began after trona equilibrated with the residual brines due to the absence of excess CO2 input. We have shown that evaporation and mineral precipitation are the major drivers for the formation of hyperalkaline, saline, and SiO2-rich brines. The discrepancy between predicted and actual sulfate and phosphate ion concentrations implies the biological cycling of these ions. The combination of different in situ and ex situ methods and modeling is key to understanding the mineral phases, precipitation sequences, and textural relations of modern and ancient evaporite deposits. The synergy of these methods could be applicable in industrial crystallization and natural brines to reconstruct the hydrogeochemical and hydroclimatic conditions of soda lakes, evaporite settings, and potentially soda oceans of early Earth and extraterrestrial planets.
Crystal nucleation
and growth usually proceed between narrow compositional
or thermal limits and produce a material record of these growth conditions
in the form of crystals of a given phase with a given size, morphology,
texture, and patterns. In material sciences, we select the growth
conditions to produce crystals with some predefined properties. In
earth sciences, we can go in the reverse direction, trying to determine
the growth conditions from the properties of natural crystals. This
strategy has been previously discussed[1,2] and used, for
instance, to constrain the growth conditions of the unique, giant
gypsum crystals in Naica, Mexico,[3,4] growth mechanisms
of magnesium and sodium salts of playa lakes,[5] or the chemistry of sea 3.5 billion years ago.[6] This crystal growth “reverse engineering”
requires a good knowledge of the crystallization processes, typically
based on thermodynamic relations between phases. Crystallization of
highly soluble salts from evaporating natural brines implies high
concentration, chemically complex solutions from which time-dependent,
kinetically controlled processes lead to the crystallization of evaporitic
minerals. Consequently, an experimental investigation of the crystallization
sequence is needed to complement thermodynamic modeling. This would
allow the use of evaporites as proxies for the study of ancient water
bodies, the paleoclimatology of basins in past arid climates, and
the early stages of continental breakup during the movement of tectonic
plates.[7]Crystallization of evaporites
from present-day seawater is relatively
well understood, but the sequence of minerals crystallizing in closed
hydrological system depends on the lithologies leached by the waters
contributing to the lake.[8−10] This variability has been roughly
classified in five major water types[8] that
do not allow the accurate prediction of detailed mineralogical sequences
with textural, size, morphological, and pattern information. In this
work, we present a methodology for in situ studies of sequential evaporation/crystallization
of brines from soda lakes in the African Rift Valley. The knowledge
of the mineral precipitation sequence in saline and soda lakes is
crucial to understanding the hydrochemical evolution of brines, paleoenvironmental
conditions (e.g., temperature, pCO2) of the evaporite deposits
in the geological record, scaling in geothermal power facilities,
and implications for industrial crystallization of these materials.[11−17] The assemblage of sodium carbonate minerals precipitated from soda
brines are also important for constraining the geochemical conditions
of soda oceans in Precambrian Earth, when life is thought to have
originated, and other Earth-like planets.[18,19]Lake Magadi is a saline pan where mainly trona, thermonatrite,
and halite precipitate during the dry seasons. Since 1911, soda ash
and common salt has been mined by precipitating trona and halite respectively
via solar evaporation of the lake brines in artificial pans with further
industrial processing.[20] The hypersaline
alkaline brines harbor a unique biodiversity relevant to the study
of physiological adaption of extremophiles[21] and their biotechnological applications.[22,23] Trace fossils of organisms from the precursor lake of Magadi are
also key to understanding depositional environments.[24]Owing to their scientific and economic values, much
work has been
carried out on the mineral precipitation in soda lakes based either
on field data or on thermodynamic modeling.[15,25−27] Some recent works have proved that a combination
of field research, lab experiments, and computer modeling is key to
understanding evaporitic brine evolution and mineral precipitation
sequences.[16,28,29] So far, there are no experimental investigations on the mineral
precipitation sequence in soda lakes. In this work, we present a comprehensive
experimental investigation and geochemical modeling of the mineral
precipitation sequence and hydrochemical evolution of Lake Magadi
brines, using evaporative mineral precipitation experiments monitored
by (a) in situ video microscopy and synchrotron X-ray diffraction
from acoustically levitated droplets; (b) ex situ Raman spectroscopy,
X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy; and (c) computational
modeling.
Experimental Section
Solution Chemistry
Brine samples were collected from
Lake Magadi during the field campaign in March 2018. All evaporation
and precipitation experiments reported in this work use one sample
selected for having a composition close to the average of Magadi waters
(sampling point located at 36.27° E and 1.84° S, 605 m above
sea level). The pH (±0.02), temperature (±0.15 °C),
total dissolved solids (TDS; ±1 mg/L), electrical conductivity
(EC; ±1 μS/cm), oxidation/reduction potential (ORP; ±1
mV), and saturation percent of dissolved oxygen (DO; ±1%) were
measured in situ at the sampling time with a Hanna HI 9829 multiparametric
probe.CO32– and HCO3– concentrations in the samples were determined
by titration with sulfuric acid using methyl orange and phenolphthalein
as indicators at the Laboratorio de Estudios Crystalográficos
(LEC) of the Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra (IACT) in
Granada (Spain). SiO2 was analyzed by using inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry at the Technical Services
of the Estación Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC) in Granada
(Spain). All the remaining chemical analyses were performed by ALS
Laboratory Group SL: Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Al3+, Fe (total), Ba2+,
B+, Sr2+, Br–, and I– were determined by using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
(ICP-MS). The samples were fixed by the addition of nitric acid prior
to analysis with ICP-MS. Cl–, F–, and SO42– were analyzed by using ion
liquid chromatography. PO43– was determined
by a colorimetric method based on molybdenum blue using discrete spectrophotometry.Table shows the
in situ and laboratory measurements of the hydrochemical parameters
of the Lake Magadi sample used for the evaporation experiments. The
dominant ions are Na+, K+, CO32–, HCO3–, and Cl– with relatively high levels of SO42–, F–, SiO2, PO43–, and Br–. However, these brines are depleted in
Ca2+, Mg2+, Al3+, and Fe.
Table 1
Results of the In Situ Brine Characterization
and the Chemical Analysis of the Sample Used for the Evaporation and
Precipitation Experimentsa
in situ pH
T (°C)
EC (mS/cm)
TDS (g/L)
ORP (mV)
DO (%)
ionic strength (M)
9.8
29.2
68.6
38.1
–464.7
46.2
0.74
Ionic concentrations
are in ppm.
Ionic concentrations
are in ppm.
Evaporation
Experiments
Evaporation and mineral precipitation
experiments were performed at 23 ± 1 °C on glass slides.
Droplets of about 25 μL (approximate diameter of 1 cm) were
poured on glass slides using plastic pipets. Two series of evaporation
experiments were implemented: in the first one, droplets were left
to evaporate until complete desiccation while in the second the experiment
was stopped after the initial stages of precipitation, removing all
the liquid with highly absorbent paper to ease the identification
of the first precipitates occurring in small amounts. Both series
were monitored with optical video microscopy (Nikon AZ100).
Ex Situ
Characterization of Precipitates
The mineralogy
of the precipitates was characterized after evaporation experiments
with the use of X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and electron
microscopy. For ex situ X-ray diffraction we used a high-resolution
Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (at the Laboratorio de Estudios
Crystalográficos) with monochromatic Cu Kα1 radiation, primary Ge(111) monochromator, and a Lynxeye PSD detector.
Diffractograms were acquired in transmission mode, at 40 kV acceleration
voltage and 40 mA current, with 2θ scans spanning from 5 to
80° with a 2θ step of 0.02° s–1.
Malvern Panalytical HighScore software (version 4.9) with the ICCD
PDF-4+ (2020) database was used for phase identification. Raman spectra
were recorded by using a HORIBA Jobin Yvon LabRAM high-resolution
Raman spectrometer equipped with an Olympus BX41 optical binocular
microscope with Koehler illumination and a CCD detector. An excitation
beam with a wavelength of 532 nm (frequency-doubled neodymium-doped
yttrium aluminum garnet laser) and output power of 100 mW was used.
Spectra were acquired with an exposure time of 5–10 s and accumulation
of 10–60 times to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Electron
microscopy was used to characterize the texture and the local elemental
composition of the precipitates with a Zeiss Supra 40VP field-emission
scanning electron microscope (FESEM) equipped with an Oxford energy-dispersive
X-ray analyzer (EDX) at the Centro de Instrumentación Científica
(CIC) of the University of Granada (Spain) operating at 5–20
keV. After complete desiccation, glass slides containing the precipitates
were directly mounted on the SEM stub by using double-faced conductive
carbon tape for electron microscopic analysis.
In Situ Characterization
of Precipitates
In situ X-ray
powder diffraction data was collected from evaporating, levitated
droplets to track the time evolution of mineral precipitation during
evaporation. These experiments were performed at the μSpot beamline
(see ref (30) for details)
at the BESSY II synchrotron (Helmholtz Centre Berlin for Materials
and Energy, Berlin, Germany), using the protocol described in ref (31). The beamline features
an acoustic levitator used as a containerless sample holder (see the
experimental setup in Figure a). In a typical experiment, 5 μL of the sample was
pipetted in one of the nodes of the standing acoustic wave of the
levitator to form a drop with an approximate diameter of 2 mm. The
droplets were maintained into the beam during data collection by gradually
lowering the reflector of the acoustic wave with decreasing volume
of the droplets. An incident beam having a 0.72929 Å wavelength
and a 100 μm size was used. Scattered intensities were collected
by a two-dimensional detector (Eiger9M, CCD 3072 × 3072) for
5 s exposures. Evaporation was followed for 80 min until complete
desiccation. The evolution of the size of the levitated droplet during
evaporation was monitored with a video camera. Levitated drop evaporation
was performed at 25 ± 1 °C and relative humidity of 35 ±
2%.
Figure 10
(a) Experimental setup used for in situ X-ray
diffraction measurements
from levitated drops. (b) Change in the size of the drop during evaporation.
(c) X-ray diffractograms collected during the evaporation of levitated
droplets of brine. Note that the first diffractograms of the corresponding
color are taken a few seconds after precipitation of the corresponding
mineral begins so that the characteristic peaks of the given phase
are clearly visible. The exact time when each mineral starts to precipitate
is reported in the text.
Computer Modeling
The PHREEQC version 3.4 code with
the Pitzer database was used for thermodynamic hydrochemical speciation,
evaporation, and precipitation calculations.[32] In a first step, evaporation was simulated at 25 °C to calculate
the saturation index of all mineral phases in the database during
the evaporative concentration of the brine. In a second step, we calculated
the equilibrium crystallization of all phases that were supersaturated
during the first step. The crystallization of minor phases, and the
inhibition of phosphate precipitation (due to Ca deficit) has been
addressed by our thermodynamic calculations by supplementing the PHREEQC
Pitzer database with fluorite, hydroxyapatite, and fluorapatite taken
from the llnl.dat database[32] and chlorapatite
from the Thermoddem database (version 1.10).[33] For villiaumite (NaF), thermodynamic data was taken from the ThermoChimie
database (version 10a).[34] Parameters for
Na(H2PO4) and its hydrated forms were taken
from ref (19).
Results
Crystallization during the evaporation of the droplet follows a
characteristic sequence and produces distinct mineral patterns. Figure shows the overall
sequence of crystallization processes during the evaporation of the
drop (the full sequence is presented in Video S1). Mineral precipitation starts on the border of the droplet
as dendritic crystals (Figure a, white arrows) followed by bunches of thick acicular crystals
that nucleate at the tips of the dendrites and grow toward the center
of the droplet (Figure a (yellow arrows) and 1b). At the center of
the drop, within the dashed circle in Figure c, precipitates form after the thick acicular
crystals have stopped growing (Figure c). Crystallization at the center continues until complete
desiccation of the brine there, but some liquid is still entrapped
between crystals of the external rim, producing the latest precipitation
events in the sequence (Figure d). The initial crystallization on and near the edge of the
drops could be due to pinning of the contact line on the hydrophilic
glass surfaces and the outward capillary flow of solutes from the
center during evaporation, creating chemical gradients. The wetting
property of the glass surface and the emerging crystals, and crystallization-driven
flow of solutes may control the subsequent patterns after initial
nucleation.[35,36] A relatively higher evaporation
rate seems responsible for the patterns observed on the center (Figure d), creating tiny
outward radiating crystals.
Figure 1
Overall mineral crystallization sequences and
patterns formed during
the evaporation of a droplet. White arrows, the first dendritic minerals;
yellow arrows, thick acicular crystals that form at the second stage;
square brackets, crystals that form at the third stage as dark spots.
The full sequence is presented in Video S1. Time (bottom left corner of each picture) counts from the beginning
of precipitation.
Overall mineral crystallization sequences and
patterns formed during
the evaporation of a droplet. White arrows, the first dendritic minerals;
yellow arrows, thick acicular crystals that form at the second stage;
square brackets, crystals that form at the third stage as dark spots.
The full sequence is presented in Video S1. Time (bottom left corner of each picture) counts from the beginning
of precipitation.Figure (full sequence
in Video S2) shows the details of the precipitation
at the border. As shown in Figure a and Video S2 (blue arrows),
the precipitation process begins on the border of the droplets in
the form of dendritic crystals. These dendrites start to precipitate
on the liquid/air/glass interface of the droplet, which was clearly
observable from top-view images. After the dendrites, bunches of acicular
crystals nucleate and grow toward the center of the droplet while
spreading sideways (see Figure b,c and Video S2 (blue arrows)). Figure c corresponds to
the end of the precipitation of the thick acicular crystals and the
beginning of a third mineral pattern in the form of irregular dark
spots. These irregular-shaped mineral grains are shown in Figure d (white arrows)
and 2e. Once the irregular-shaped minerals
began to form, precipitation at the center of the drop starts (described
in the next paragraph). From this time on, the desiccation and precipitation
processes in the border advance in a reverse direction (toward the
border of the droplet) where the acicular crystals and the border
dendrites were already present (see Figure f,g and Video S2 (green arrows)). The white dashed ellipses in Figure g show the irregular-shaped grains that precipitate
between the acicular crystals. High-resolution micrographs show that
these irregular dark spots are aggregates of well-developed cubic
crystals (see Figure h), most probably halite. The last phase of the precipitation process
took place beneath the border dendrites as shown in Figure g (between the yellow lines). Figure and Video S3 show the details of the precipitation
process in this area. Figure a shows the area where the first dendrites formed. The transparent
bladelike crystals (indicated by the red arrows in Figure b) precipitate from the residual
water below the dendrites at the end of the evaporation process. In
addition, the first precipitated dendrites (Figure a) change from transparent to opaque because
of the latest precipitation of other minerals from capillary water
entrapped between the dendrites. In qualitative terms, the precipitation
rate of the minerals from the residual brine held between the dendritic
and the acicular trona was the slowest whereas the fastest precipitation
rate was observed on the center. The second and third faster rates
of precipitation were observed with the dendritic and acicular crystals
of trona, respectively.
Figure 2
Frames from Video S2 (acquired at the
indicated time in minutes since the precipitation began) showing the
details of the precipitation sequence of the border dendrites, the
acicular minerals, and the irregular dark spots (arrows in panel d
and circles in panel g) forming between the acicular minerals. Panel
h is a close-up view of the irregular dark spots in panel g showing
the aggregates of cubic crystals (note the single cubic crystal inside
the black square).
Figure 3
Evolution of border dendrites
area during last phases of the precipitation
sequence that took place between the branches. The white arrow points
from the border to the center of the droplet; red arrows show transparent
bladelike crystals beneath the border dendrites.
Frames from Video S2 (acquired at the
indicated time in minutes since the precipitation began) showing the
details of the precipitation sequence of the border dendrites, the
acicular minerals, and the irregular dark spots (arrows in panel d
and circles in panel g) forming between the acicular minerals. Panel
h is a close-up view of the irregular dark spots in panel g showing
the aggregates of cubic crystals (note the single cubic crystal inside
the black square).Evolution of border dendrites
area during last phases of the precipitation
sequence that took place between the branches. The white arrow points
from the border to the center of the droplet; red arrows show transparent
bladelike crystals beneath the border dendrites.Figure (full sequence
in Video S4) shows the details of the crystallization
sequence at the center of the droplets. These precipitates appear
later than the cubic crystals on the tips of the acicular crystals
(see Figure d). Precipitation
at the center begins with starlike dendritic minerals that radiate
from the center outward (Figure a). Once the precipitation of the radiating branches
ceases, other crystals (also dendritic) start to precipitate between
their branches as shown by the white arrows in Figure b. Finally, the residual brine entrapped
between the branches of the dendrites evaporates, producing a later
precipitate on the preexisting dendrites that darken them (Figure c,d).
Figure 4
Frames taken from Video S4 showing the
precipitation process and mineral patterns on the center of the droplets.
The white arrows indicate the crystals forming after the starlike
dendritic minerals.
Frames taken from Video S4 showing the
precipitation process and mineral patterns on the center of the droplets.
The white arrows indicate the crystals forming after the starlike
dendritic minerals.The minerals making these
patterns were identified by using X-ray
diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Powder X-ray diffraction of the
whole precipitates from dry droplets revealed the presence of trona,
thermonatrite, halite, and minor sylvite (Figure ).
Figure 5
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of whole precipitates.
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of whole precipitates.Raman spectra of the border dendrites that form
first were collected
after gentle drying of the drop with absorbent paper to avoid further
precipitation. These spectra indicate that these dendrites are made
of trona (Figure a).
In addition, some thermonatrite was detected probably from the evaporation
of the water that could not be completely removed. Raman spectra of
the last minerals of the precipitation sequence that form beneath
and between the dendritic trona (Figure and Video S3)
revealed thermonatrite (Figure b). The microscopic image in Figure a was taken after removal of the water with
filter paper, whereas the one in Figure b was taken after complete evaporation of
the whole solution in the border. The Raman modes between 100 and
300 cm–1 are assigned to the lattice modes, whereas
the vibration peaks at 1062 and 1067/1068 cm–1 represent
the symmetric stretching modes of carbonate groups in trona and thermonatrite,
respectively.[37,38]
Figure 6
Raman spectra of (a) border branches that
form first (green dots,
trona; orange dots, trona and thermonatrite) and (b) the last precipitates
that form beneath and between the border trona branches (red dots,
thermonatrite).
Raman spectra of (a) border branches that
form first (green dots,
trona; orange dots, trona and thermonatrite) and (b) the last precipitates
that form beneath and between the border trona branches (red dots,
thermonatrite).The second type of crystals that
precipitate next to the border
trona dendrites were thick, and the next were thin, acicular crystals
(Figure a–g
and Video S2). Raman spectra of these acicular
crystals show that they are made only of trona (Figure ). Once the growth of the acicular crystals
ceases, aggregates of cubic crystals start to crystallize (Figure g (dark spots) and 2h). These cubic crystal aggregates show no Raman
signal, suggesting halite or villiaumite.
Figure 7
Raman spectra of (a)
thick and (b) thin acicular minerals that
form next to the border dendrites.
Raman spectra of (a)
thick and (b) thin acicular minerals that
form next to the border dendrites.Raman spectroscopy of the central dendritic minerals revealed a
combination of trona and thermonatrite (Figure ). The crystallization of these dendrites
has similarities with the initial crystallization at the border of
the droplet. This implies that the first mineral that forms at the
center could be trona, whereas thermonatrite comes later due to the
later desiccation of the residual water held in the pores between
trona crystals.
Figure 8
Raman spectra of radiating starlike minerals that form
at the center
of the droplets (green dots, trona; orange dots, trona + thermonatrite).
Raman spectra of radiating starlike minerals that form
at the center
of the droplets (green dots, trona; orange dots, trona + thermonatrite).The distribution of mineral phases and the presence
of minor or
amorphous precipitates were tested by using EDX elemental composition
maps of the precipitates that form on different parts of the droplet.
These maps show mainly Na–CO3 minerals, NaCl (halite),
and minor KCl (sylvite) and NaF (villiaumite) (Figure , Figures S2 and S3). Figure a shows
the border precipitates. Raman spectra revealed that these Na–CO3 minerals are trona and thermonatrite (Figure ). Halite and sylvite, which are Raman inactive
minerals, were identified by EDX analysis. SEM backscattered electron
images show that the border dendrites were highly feathery (Figure S1a). The needlelike crystals are trona
crystals with smaller halite crystals between them (Figures g,h and 9a, and Video S2). These halite crystals
were the second mineral in the precipitation sequence (Figure b). Semirounded cubic crystals
of villiaumite have been observed between the dendritic trona crystals
(see Figures S2 and S3). The dendrites
at the center are Na–CO3 minerals (trona and thermonatrite)
with halite (Figure c). Once the precipitation of the trona dendrites ceases, halite
and villiaumite precipitate between their branches (Figure b and Video S4). The crystals pointed out by the white arrows in Figure b were halite as
revealed by the EDX maps (Figure c). The dendrites are open-textured aggregates like
the initial dendrites at the border (see Figure S1c).
Figure 9
EDX map of (a) border precipitates (white arrow points
from the
border to the center of the droplet), (b) acicular minerals together
with irregular aggregates, and (c) radiating starlike minerals that
form on the center.
EDX map of (a) border precipitates (white arrow points
from the
border to the center of the droplet), (b) acicular minerals together
with irregular aggregates, and (c) radiating starlike minerals that
form on the center.In situ, containerless
X-ray diffraction data from evaporating,
levitated droplets were collected in the μSpot beamline at BESSY
to check for any effect related to the glass substrate or the flat
geometry of the drying drop (see Figure a). Figure b shows eight successive pictures
of the levitated drop recorded to track the time evolution of the
droplet volume during evaporation. Figure c shows the in situ X-ray diffractograms
collected during evaporation. Trona precipitates first after 2670
s since evaporation began. Precipitation of halite began 3 min later
(after 2855 s; see the green bars). Finally, precipitation of thermonatrite
started after 2955 s (red bars). The in situ X-ray diffraction data
confirmed the precipitation sequence that was observed in the previously
described experiments.(a) Experimental setup used for in situ X-ray
diffraction measurements
from levitated drops. (b) Change in the size of the drop during evaporation.
(c) X-ray diffractograms collected during the evaporation of levitated
droplets of brine. Note that the first diffractograms of the corresponding
color are taken a few seconds after precipitation of the corresponding
mineral begins so that the characteristic peaks of the given phase
are clearly visible. The exact time when each mineral starts to precipitate
is reported in the text.Most previous knowledge
on the precipitation sequence from soda
lake brines comes from thermodynamic modeling.[15,25−27] To set our results in this framework, and to check
for any unexpected behavior, mostly large kinetic effects, we have
performed a set of hydrochemical modeling runs using the PHREEQC code.
These simulations use Pitzer speciation[32] using the pitzer.dat database provided by PHREEQC 3.4 after inclusion
of the missing species (alkalinity, Ca, Mg, K, S, Si, and F) and the
corresponding speciation and dissolution reactions from different
databases as mentioned in the Experimental Section. Evaporation and mineral precipitation simulations compute successive
equilibrium states separated by discrete steps of slight water removal. Figure shows the output
of this model in terms of the sequence of mineral crystallization
(a) and ionic concentration of the relevant species (b) versus concentration
factor (CF; the ratio between the initial brine volume and the current
volume at each time). The output of the model reproduces very well
the experimental observations.
Figure 11
PHREEQC simulation of evaporation and
mineral precipitation from
Lake Magadi brine at 25 °C: (a) the mineral precipitation sequence
and the amount of precipitate and (b) chemical evolution of the brine
during mineral precipitation. In panel a, three key points during
evaporation are marked by vertical dotted lines labeled with references
to previous figures where the status of the brine at this point is
shown. Blue, green, and yellow dotted lines represent the time when
trona, halite, and thermonatrite precipitation is dominant during
the sequence.
PHREEQC simulation of evaporation and
mineral precipitation from
Lake Magadi brine at 25 °C: (a) the mineral precipitation sequence
and the amount of precipitate and (b) chemical evolution of the brine
during mineral precipitation. In panel a, three key points during
evaporation are marked by vertical dotted lines labeled with references
to previous figures where the status of the brine at this point is
shown. Blue, green, and yellow dotted lines represent the time when
trona, halite, and thermonatrite precipitation is dominant during
the sequence.Among the phases identified by
in situ and ex situ experiments,
trona was predicted to precipitate first at a CF of 9.7, which agrees
with the experimental observations. Evaporation linearly raises the
concentrations of Na+ and CO32– until the precipitation of trona commences (Figure b). Once trona precipitation sets in, sodium
and carbonate species start to deplete until the CF reaches a value
of 16. Nahcolite is predicted to precipitate for a short period between
CFs of 6.2 and 16.4, depleting the HCO3– concentration. This depletion continues due to the onset of trona
precipitation via the dissolution of nahcolite. After a CF of 30,
trona no longer precipitates due to the minimal HCO3– concentration, leaving a constant amount of about
114 mmol/kg. However, nahcolite has not been identified in the lab
experiments, due to either a short transient presence in the drops
or to slow nucleation kinetics.Halite and villiaumite are predicted
to precipitate in the second
phase (Figure a).
The amount of precipitated halite was predicted to be larger than
the amount of trona after complete desiccation. Villiaumite precipitates
at a CF of 30, almost simultaneously with halite which starts forming
at a CF of 32. Thermonatrite crystallization is predicted at a CF
of 62.6. Sylvite and glaserite appear near the complete dryness of
the brine due to K+ and SO42– evaporative concentrations (Figure b). The pH evolution during evaporation was controlled
by the CO32–/HCO3– ratio. Initially, pH decreases slightly from 9.8 to 9.4 until a
CF of 6.4 (Figure b, blue dotted line). Afterward, pH steeply rises until a CF of 63
due to the steep decline in HCO3– concentration
following the subsequent onset of nahcolite and trona precipitation.
Once thermonatrite precipitation set in (after a CF of 63), pH rises
gently with CO32– concentration.On the basis of the thermodynamic model, the initial Lake Magadi
brine was supersaturated with respect to fluorapatite and magnesite
(see Figure S4a). The amounts of fluorapatite
and magnesite predicted to precipitate are about 0.02 and 0.5 mmol,
respectively. These minerals were not detected in the lab experiments
likely because of their minor amounts. Simulation of evaporation in
the absence of fluoride and phosphate ions shows that the initial
Lake Magadi brine was supersaturated with respect to calcite and magnesite
(see Figure S5a). At a CF of 8.6, calcite
starts dissolving and gaylussite begins to form until a CF of 11.5.
Pirssonite came to equilibrium with the solution after a CF of 11.5
via dissolution of gaylussite. However, calcite, magnesite, gaylussite,
and pirssonite were not detected in the lab experiments most likely
because of their trace amounts in the mix of minerals. The amounts
of calcite, gaylussite, and pirssonite predicted to precipitate are
about 0.12 mmol, whereas that of magnesite was 0.5 mmol. As a result
of their trace amounts, precipitation of Ca–Mg carbonate minerals
did not deplete the carbonate ions during evaporation simulation (see Figure S5b).Amorphous silica supersaturates
at a CF of 3 (see Figure a), reaching a maximum amount
of precipitate (1.2 mmol/kg of brine) at a CF of 17. From this point
on, it began to redissolve because of the steep pH rise that increases
the solubility of SiO2.[39] Amorphous
silica starts to precipitate again when the brine is about to dry,
after a CF of 275.
Discussion
Deriving conclusions
on the natural evaporitic crystallization
in Lake Magadi from these drop evaporation experiments requires scaling
from the millimeter to the tens of meters spatial scale and from the
minutes to the year (seasons) temporal scale. After this scaling,
the experimentally observed evaporative precipitation sequence explains
many features of the Magadi area deposits and the current precipitation
in the lake. Trona has precipitated in Lake Magadi for the past 100 000
years and continues today, forming 65 m thick evaporite deposits.[40] Precipitation occurs at both the bottom and
the surface of the lake. Long vertical bladed crystals with sharp
points grow upward from the bottom of the water body as stellate groups,
forming a firm mesh of crystals. Thin trona crusts precipitate on
the water surface[15,41−43] as aggregates
of smaller crystals growing at higher supersaturation values under
fast evaporation. The experimentally observed initial phase producing
dendritic trona and bunches of fast-growing trona needles on the border
of the droplets corresponds to the growth of vertical bladed crystals
from the bottom of the lake. The third phase of high supersaturation
thermonatrite precipitation in the central region of the drop, concomitant
with the latest precipitation of trona and halite, is equivalent to
the precipitation of thin crusts at the surface of the lake. The upward
radiating blades terminate against the trona crust on the surface,
which serves as the nuclei of the following generation of crystals
for the next year. The successive growth of crystals in this manner
gives rise to a layered appearance of trona deposits,[15,41−43] made of 2–5 cm annual bands[41] with a content of trona of about 90%.[44] The precipitation of thermonatrite and halite between the
dendritic and acicular trona crystals in lab experiments is relevant
for the interpretation of the Magadi evaporitic sequence. Thermonatrite
and halite form only in the modern evaporite sequence but are not
reported in the ancient deposits of Lake Magadi. This must be due
to a change in the climatic/hydrologic conditions of the lake; either
the paleolake brines did not reach supersaturation required for these
minerals to precipitate or they precipitated but redissolved during
an episodic freshening of the paleolake brines. In contrast to the
natural lake, significant amounts of thermonatrite and halite precipitate
respectively at the bottom and on the surface of the artificial pans
of TATA Chemicals made for the commercial production of salt by harvesting
the top layer of halite.[42,45] The precipitation of
significant amounts of thermonatrite and halite in these pans is explained
by our results: the company pumps the HCO3-depleted lake
brine (after trona precipitation) into shallow evaporation ponds where
evaporation is faster than in the lake, fresher water inputs are absent,
and organic production of CO2 is negligible. Fast evaporation
in these HCO3-depleted ponds, as in the last stage of our
experiments, precipitates large amounts of thermonatrite and halite
with some trona.[42,45]Drill cores of the evaporite
series also contain nahcolite.[40,41] In our calculations,
nahcolite is predicted to appear early during
evaporation and then redissolve, but it was not identified during
the laboratory experiments. This can be due to kinetic effects, not
included in our calculations because no data is available on this
kinetics; nahcolite precipitation should be slow with respect to drop
evaporation speed. Nahcolite primarily precipitates on the bottom
of Nasikie Engida, where there is a higher flux of magmatic CO2 along the fault zones.[15,46] The opposite trend
of the CO32–/HCO3– ratio after a CF of 15 reflects the precipitation of trona that
is limited by the low HCO3– content of
the brine. The later increase in CO32– and decrease in HCO3–, and the corresponding
increase in pH, lead to the precipitation of thermonatrite and the
end of trona precipitation.The early precipitation of calcium
carbonate minerals produces
the depletion of calcium, which results in a lack of apatite precipitation[19,47] and the consequent accumulation of phosphate in soda lakes up to
levels relevant to the syntheses of prebiotic biomolecules. Lake Magadi
samples were supersaturated with respect to fluorapatite since the
beginning of evaporation. The amount of fluorapatite was limited by
the very low calcium content. As a result, phosphate concentration
increases linearly with evaporation (see Figure S4a,b). Apatite precipitation has not been reported in Lake
Magadi because of the absence of or a minor amount of Ca in the brines.
In the simulation, phosphate concentration was overestimated due to
microbial phosphate consumption and deposition with organic matter
in the actual environment.[19] Based on the
model predictions, there were no Na(H2PO4) mineral
precipitations until almost complete dryness.Other consequences
of the depletion of Ca in the brines are the
lack of fluorite precipitation and the evaporative accumulation of
fluoride until villiaumite supersaturation. Once villiaumite precipitation
begins at a CF of 30, the fluoride content equilibrates. Villiaumite
is a common constituent of the surface deposits of Lake Magadi brines.[41,42]Calcite, magnesite, gaylussite, and pirssonite are present
as efflorescent
crusts and pisolites in modern Lake Magadi and drill cores from Lake
Magadi and Lake Bogoria.[15,42,48−50] These aggregates form due to the episodic interaction
of Ca-rich freshwater with the sodic brine on the lake margin.[15,40,42] Alternatively, as observed in
other saline lakes and demonstrated experimentally, Ca–Mg carbonate
precipitation could have been mediated by metabolic activities in
the lake water.[51−54] Calcite spherule nucleation was observed at the sediment–water
interface of highly alkaline lakes with coexisting Ca–Mg-rich
hydrochemistry and microbial-driven colloidal substances, forming
cemented spherulites in different depositional settings.[53] The precipitation of these phases is predicted
by our thermodynamic models in small amounts (less than 0.5 mmol/kg
of brine evaporated) at the beginning of evaporation, but only in
the absence of phosphate and fluoride (see Figure S5c). Precipitation of these minerals was not observed in our
in situ characterization, most probably due to the very low Ca concentration
of the sample, which was equilibrated with Ca phases at sampling time
and lacks the additional Ca supply to the lake by later freshwater
inflow or groundwater input to the lake.In Lake Magadi, as
the pH rises above 9, silica remains concentrating
at the same rate as chloride due to the polymerization of silicic
acid.[42,44,55] Our thermodynamic
model predicted a continuous increase in silica concentration until
the initial precipitation and after redissolution of amorphous silica
(from CF 6 to 32) up to close to complete dryness. In our experiments,
amorphous silica has not been explicitly detected, but some fluffy
precipitates can be seen in the drop earlier than trona; for example,
see the last frame in Figure b (2460 s). However, no diffraction peaks were observed. These
precipitates before trona must be amorphous phases, probably amorphous
silica, representing the precipitation of siliceous phases such as
opal-A, magadiite, or gels in Lake Magadi and Little Magadi.[15] Silica gels precipitate in close proximity to
the hot springs of Little Magadi lake and near the shorelines under
active evaporation.[15,40,48,56]Precipitation of sylvite and glaserite
is predicted by our model
close to complete desiccation, but they have not been reported in
the Lake Magadi basin because complete desiccation has never or very
seldomly occurred. During the rainy season, freshwater supply reaches
the lake before brines reach supersaturation with respect to sylvite
and glaserite. These minerals have been reported in other alkaline
lakes of the East African Rift Valley, for example, in Lake Katwe
(Uganda).[57]
Conclusions
The
evaporitic mineral precipitation sequence in saline and soda
brines is challenging to monitor due to concomitant precipitation
to many phases and the transformation between different hydrates of
sodium carbonate–bicarbonate minerals and secondary mineral
precipitation during sample handling under different conditions of
pH, temperature, pCO2, and water activity. In this work,
we have presented the synergy of multiple methodologies that allowed
accurate determination of the mineral precipitation sequence during
laboratory evaporation of Lake Magadi soda brines. The proposed combination
of in situ methods used to characterize the evaporative crystallization
of salts from Magadi waters shows a high potential to build and check
hydrochemical models in earth sciences that can be used in (a) explaining
current depositional environments, (b) interpreting the evaporitic
deposits appearing in sedimentary records in terms of paleoclimatic
indicators, and (c) proposing applied methods for the industrial use
of these brines at the optimal time during their natural hydrochemical
evolution.The proposed methodology can be improved if additional
in situ
information is needed from minor, short-lived metastable or amorphous
minerals.[58,59] The most promising method for this type
of study is the simultaneous use of synchrotron diffraction and Raman
spectroscopy in levitated, containerless evaporation experiments.
Exploring this combination will be the next step in our studies in
this field.
Authors: Karl Bischoff; Eva Sirantoine; Moyra E J Wilson; Annette D George; Juliana Mendes Monteiro; Martin Saunders Journal: Geobiology Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 4.407
Authors: Electra Kotopoulou; Antonio Delgado Huertas; Juan Manuel Garcia-Ruiz; Jose M Dominguez-Vera; Jose Maria Lopez-Garcia; Isabel Guerra-Tschuschke; Fernando Rull Journal: ACS Earth Space Chem Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 3.475
Authors: Fermin Otálora; A Mazurier; J M Garcia-Ruiz; M J Van Kranendonk; E Kotopoulou; A El Albani; C J Garrido Journal: J Appl Crystallogr Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 3.304