Literature DB >> 35400931

Comparison between an Operating Surgical Microscope and High Magnification Surgical Loupes in Microvascular Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects in a Tertiary Healthcare Centre.

C V Dhanush1, Ehtaih Sham1, Thyagaraj Jayaram Reddy1, Col Suresh Menon1, D Veerendra Kumar1, Abhinay Indrakumar1, M Karthik Vishwas1, Romir Navaneetham1, Ritvik Vinayak1, Sijo Sam Mathews1.   

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Microvascular free tissue transfers have become an important method of reconstruction following head & neck oncological resection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of surgical loupes against surgical operating microscope, which is the gold standard for microvascular anastomosis and also to explore the possibility of surgical loupes as an essential cost-effective armamentarium in head and neck reconstruction. Materials and
Methods: This prospective randomized study included 40 patients diagnosed with head and neck malignancies, requiring microvascular free flap reconstruction. A total of 20 patients who underwent free flap reconstruction following oncologic/maxillofacial defects using high magnification surgical loupes & the other 20 patients were subjected to reconstruction under an operating surgical microscope. The efficacy was assessed based on the following parameters. 1. Total operating time taken for completing anastomosis. 2. Overall fatigue. 3. Free flap failure rate.
Results: The microscope group took an overall mean time of 34.26 min considering its limited degree of freedom in adjusting intraoperatively whereas the loupes group had a shorter mean anastomosis time 33.29 min considering its ease of operator adjustability. Overall, fatigue was compared using Mann-Whitney Test and found to be statistically significant with P value of 0.17, the loupe group was found to be better with mean score of 6.90 in 21 patients than microscope with mean score of 6.21in 19 patients. Flap survival rate in the loupe group had two cases of venous obstruction at 24 h follow-up and microscope group had 1 case of venous.obstruction.
Conclusion: The success with loupe only free tissue transfer can be attributable considering expertise with the microscope and the loupes can be a cost-effective alternative to microscope. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Free tissue transfer; Microvascular Reconstruction; Operating microscope; Surgical Loupe

Year:  2021        PMID: 35400931      PMCID: PMC8934845          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-021-01654-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  8 in total

1.  A new type of magnification system in vascular surgery--an evaluation study.

Authors:  W J Hofmann; J Walter; M Czerny; H Magometschnigg
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.069

2.  A novel microsurgical anastomosis training model using gradually thawed cryopreserved microvessels of rat cadavers.

Authors:  Ali-Farid Safi; Sema Safi; Mahmoud Tayeh; Marco Timmer; Roland Goldbrunner; Martin Kauke
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A history of vascular and microvascular surgery.

Authors:  Rory F Rickard; Donald A Hudson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Occupational injury in plastic surgeons.

Authors:  Avery C Capone; Pranay M Parikh; Margaret E Gatti; Bruce J Davidson; Steven P Davison
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Free flap reconstruction in paediatric patients with head and neck cancer: clinical considerations for comprehensive care.

Authors:  Z Y Sun; Y M Chen; L Xie; X Yang; T Ji
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Comparison of hand-sewn versus modified coupled arterial anastomoses in head and neck reconstruction: a single operator's experience.

Authors:  Z Guo; W Cui; M Hu; B Yu; B Han; Y Li; X Tang; C Li; L Li
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Free flap microvascular anastomosis in head and neck reconstruction using a 4K three-dimensional exoscope system (VITOM 3D).

Authors:  A De Virgilio; O Iocca; P Di Maio; G Mercante; T Mondello; P Yiu; L Malvezzi; R Pellini; F Ferreli; G Spriano
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 8.  An evolutionary perspective on the history of flap reconstruction in the upper extremity.

Authors:  Frank Fang; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 1.907

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.