| Literature DB >> 35400171 |
Xiaomeng You1, Ushashi C Dadwal2, Marc E Lenburg3, Melissa A Kacena2, Julia F Charles1,4.
Abstract
Compositional and functional alterations to the gut microbiota during aging are hypothesized to potentially impact our health. Thus, determining aging-specific gut microbiome alterations is critical for developing microbiome-based strategies to improve health and promote longevity in the elderly. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis of publicly available 16S rRNA gene sequencing data from studies investigating the effect of aging on the gut microbiome in mice. Aging reproducibly increased gut microbial alpha diversity and shifted the microbial community structure in mice. We applied the bioinformatic tool PICRUSt2 to predict microbial metagenome function and established a random forest classifier to differentiate between microbial communities from young and old hosts and to identify aging-specific metabolic features. In independent validation data sets, this classifier achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.75 to 0.97 in differentiating microbiomes from young and old hosts. We found that 50% of the most important predicted aging-specific metabolic features were involved in carbohydrate metabolism. Furthermore, fecal short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations were significantly decreased in old mice, and the expression of the SCFA receptor Gpr41 in the colon was significantly correlated with the relative abundances of gut microbes and microbial carbohydrate metabolic pathways. In conclusion, this study identified aging-specific alterations in the composition and function of the gut microbiome and revealed a potential relationship between aging, microbial carbohydrate metabolism, fecal SCFA, and colonic Gpr41 expression. IMPORTANCE Aging-associated microbial alteration is hypothesized to play an important role in host health and longevity. However, investigations regarding specific gut microbes or microbial functional alterations associated with aging have had inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis across 5 independent studies to investigate the effect of aging on the gut microbiome in mice. Our analysis revealed that aging increased gut microbial alpha diversity and shifted the microbial community structure. To determine if we could reliably differentiate the gut microbiomes from young and old hosts, we established a random forest classifier based on predicted metagenome function and validated its performance against independent data sets. Alterations in microbial carbohydrate metabolism and decreased fecal short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations were key features of aging and correlated with host colonic expression of the SCFA receptor Gpr41. This study advances our understanding of the impact of aging on the gut microbiome and proposes a hypothesis that alterations in gut microbiota-derived SCFA-host GPR41 signaling are a feature of aging.Entities:
Keywords: aging; carbon metabolism; meta-analysis; murine gut microbiome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35400171 PMCID: PMC9040766 DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01248-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 7.324
FIG 1Bioinformatic analysis pipeline. The raw 16S rRNA gene sequencing data were downloaded and imported into QIIME2 for data processing. DADA2 was used to denoise reads. OTU picking was performed by the Vsearch closed-reference method. The resulting feature table and feature data were then used for phylogenic tree construction and taxonomy annotation, followed by diversity analysis and taxon bar plot visualization. Functional prediction was performed by PICRUSt2. A random forest classifier was established based on predicted functional pathways to differentiate young- and old-age gut microbiomes and identify aging-specific metabolic features. The random forest classifier was then verified by two external data sets generated by us. The CB6F1 16S rRNA gene sequencing data were analyzed according to the same analysis pipeline. The whole-genome sequencing data were first filtered to remove low-quality and host genome contaminant reads, followed by SortMeRNA and OTU picking for taxonomy characterization and HUMAnN3 for functional analysis.
Summary of study characteristics
| Data | Sex | Age (mo) | Sequencing | No. of samples | Database/accession | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | Old | Young | Old | |||||
| Exp1 | Female | 2 | 26 | V4 | 5 | 5 | SRA/ | M. N. Conley et al. ( |
| Exp2 | Female | 1.5–2 | 18.5 | V4 | 6 | 6 | SRA/ | H. C. Barreto et al. ( |
| Exp3 | Female | 3 | 22 | V3-V4 | 5 | 5 | ENA/ | M. Stebegg et al. ( |
| Exp4 | Male | 4 | 24 | V3-V4 | 8 | 8 | SRA/ | B. van der Lugt et al. ( |
| Exp5 | Male | 5–6 | 18–20 | V4-V5 | 38 | 27 | SRA/ | J. D. Hoffman et al. ( |
| Exp6 | Male | 3 | 22 | V3-V4 | 7 | 14 | ENA/ | M. Stebegg et al. ( |
| CB6F1 | Male | 3 | 24 | V4 | 8 | 8 | SRA/ | TBD |
| Metagenomics | Male | 3 | 26 | Whole genome | 10 | 10 | SRA/ | This study |
Only control young and old data were included.
Only control young and old C57BL/6 data were included.
Only fresh fecal samples were included.
Low-sequencing-depth data were excluded.
TBD, to be determined (You X, Yan J, Herzog J, Campbell R, Hoke A, Hammamieh R, Sartor RB, Kacena MA, Chakraborty N, Charles JF, manuscript in preparation).
FIG 2Forest plots of alpha diversity metrics. Shannon (A), Simpson (B), Faith’s PD (C), and Chao1 (D) indices demonstrated an increase in alpha diversity in response to aging. Analysis of the combined data sets was performed using a linear mixed-effects model using the formula log2FC ∼ age + (1|study). A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
FIG 3Comparative compositions of the gut microbiomes of young and old mice. (A) Relative abundances of taxa at the phylum level show that Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominate the microbial communities in both young and aged mice. (B) A forest plot of the ratio of the Firmicutes phylum to the Bacteroidetes showed no significant alteration between young and old mice. (C) Taxa significantly enriched by age on combined data sets. For panels B and C, the combined analysis was performed using a linear mixed-effects model using the formula log2FC ∼ age + (1|study). The Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to correct for multiple comparisons. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
FIG 4Age-related shifts in microbial community structure. The effect of age on community structure for each study individually and for the combined studies was assessed by principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the beta diversity measures unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances. Significance was determined by PERMANOVA with 999 permutations. (A and B) PCoA plots for unweighted UniFrac distances for each study (A) and the aggregate data (B) show significant shifts in the gut microbiome between the young and old mice. (C) PCoA of weighted UniFrac distances for aggregated data did not reveal a significant difference.
FIG 5Random forest classifier differentiates microbiomes of young and old mice. (A) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the random forest classifier showing performance against the test data set (green) and external data sets, CB6F1 16S (blue) and B6 metagenomic (purple). (B) Area under the ROC curve (AUC). (C) The top 20 aging-specific features of the classifier based on ranked mean decreases in Gini impurities. The color bar shows the log2 fold changes (logFC) of old versus young. Features boxed in red are involved in carbohydrate metabolism.
FIG 6Fecal SCFA decrease with aging. (A) Fecal acetate, propionate, butyrate, and total SCFA in young and old mice. (B) Taxa at the genus level correlated with fecal SCFA concentrations. The Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to correct for multiple comparisons. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
FIG 7Correlation of Gpr41 and microbial carbohydrate metabolism. (A) Relative expression of Gpr41 and Gpr43 in the colons of young versus old mice. (B) Correlation of colonic Gpr41 expression with carbohydrate degradation and fermentation pathways. Significantly correlated pathways are highlighted in red text. (C and D) Comparison of IL-6 and TNF-α in young versus old mice. (C) Colonic Il-6 and Tnfα expression; (D) serum IL-6 and TNF-α. ns, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.