| Literature DB >> 35399957 |
Shuang Liu1,2, Ruying Cao1,3, Luna Liu1,2, Youyuan Lv1,2, Xiangyu Qi1,2, Zhongshang Yuan4, Xiude Fan1,2,5, Chunxiao Yu1,2,5, Qingbo Guan1,2,5.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed at investigating the association between testosterone levels and gut microbiota in male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and providing a new strategy to elucidate the pathological mechanism of testosterone deficiency in T2DM patients.Entities:
Keywords: T2DM; dysbiosis; gut microbiota; male; testosterone deficiency
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35399957 PMCID: PMC8990747 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.836485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1The schematic diagram of this study.
Clinical characteristics.
| Variables | LT (n = 18) | NT (n = 28) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 42.22 ± 8.10 | 41.36 ± 6.85 | 0.68 |
|
| 26.56 ± 5.12 | 25.72 ± 3.93 | 0.67 |
|
| 129.78 ± 5.07 | 127.36 ± 3.33 | 0.37 |
|
| 89.72 ± 3.54 | 84.39 ± 2.03 | 0.16 |
|
| |||
| FSH (mIU/mL) | 5.98 ± 3.19 | 5.83 ± 2.72 | 0.88 |
| LH (mIU/mL) | 5.43 ± 2.23 | 5.98 ± 2.82 | 0.47 |
| PRL (ng/mL) | 12.89 ± 9.63 | 13.61 ± 4.48 | 0.77 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.13 ± 1.24 | 3.31 ± 0.79 | 0.59 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.18 (1.45, 5.07) | 1.66 (1.07, 2.45) | 0.12 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.14 ± 1.91 | 5.11 ± 1.13 | 0.95 |
| URIC (μmol/L) | 392.72 ± 111.31 | 348.39 ± 69.52 | 0.14 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 10.52 ± 3.08 | 9.06 ± 3.08 | 0.13 |
| HbA1c (%) | 9.25 ± 1.97 | 9.70 ± 2.52 | 0.50 |
| INS (μU/mL) | 10.98 ± 6.64 | 7.56 ± 5.14 | 0.08 |
| C-P (ng/mL) | 2.76 ± 1.16 | 1.79 ± 0.84 | 0.002 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 1.83 (0.67, 3.25) | 1.16 (0.79, 1.71) | 0.29 |
|
| |||
| 0–5 | 13 (72.2%) | 18 (64.3%) | 0.75 |
| >5 | 5 (27.8%) | 10 (35.7%) | |
|
| |||
| Hypertension | 10 (55.6%) | 6 (21.4%) | 0.03 |
| Coronary artery disease | 2 (11.1%) | 2 (7.1%) | 0.64 |
| Fatty liver | 15 (83.3%) | 20 (71.4%) | 0.29 |
|
| |||
| None | 4 (22.2%) | 7 (25%) | 0.96 |
| Past | 3 (16.7%) | 4 (14.3%) | |
| Current | 11 (61.1%) | 17 (60.7%) | |
|
| |||
| None | 8 (44.4%) | 8 (28.6%) | 0.52 |
| Social | 7 (38.9%) | 15 (53.6%) | |
| More than twice a week | 3 (16.7%) | 5 (19.8%) | |
|
| |||
| Acarbose | 1 (5.6%) | 3 (10.7%) | 0.83 |
| Metformin | 3 (16.7%) | 6 (21.4%) | |
| Linagliptin | 3 (16.7%) | 1 (3.6%) | |
| Acarbose+ metformin | 2 (11.1%) | 4 (14.3%) | |
| Metformin + linagliptin | 1 (5.6%) | 2 (7.1%) | |
| None | 8 (44.4%) | 12 (42.9%) |
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; FPG, fasting blood glucose; INS, insulin; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c; URIC, uric acid; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
All data except TG were normal distribution and were analyzed by t-test, expressed as mean ± SD. TG of non-normal distribution were analyzed by non-parametric Wilcoxon test and expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR). Fisher exact tests were used to compare the constituent ratio.
Figure 2Alpha and beta diversity of the gut microbial communities from participants. (A) Comparison of observed OUT Numbers, chao1, shannon and simpson indexes between two groups. (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of fecal microbiota, each dot represents the bacterial community composition of one individual stool sample, and the axis titles indicates the percentage variation explained (27.3% and 14.79 %, respectively).
Figure 3Microbial species differed between LT group and NT group. Linear discrimination analysis (LAD) effect size (LEfSE). Histogram of the LAD scores computed for differentially abundant species between the LT group and control (NT) group. The LAD scores (Log 10)>2 are listed.
Figure 4Comparison of Random Forest Model based on taxa composition.
Figure 5(A) The relationship between gut microbiota and sex hormone. (B) The relationship between gut microbiota and related metabolic indicators. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 6(A) The relative abundance of Lachnospirales is negatively correlated with testosterone levels (P = 0.015). (B) The relative abundance of Firmicutes is significantly negatively associated with testosterone level (P = 0.011).
Stepwise linear regression analysis of risk factors associated with testosterone in T2DM.
| Variables | B | SE | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lach | -3.267 | 1.584 | 0.045 |
| HOMA-IR | -0.138 | 0.062 | 0.031 |
| CRP | -0.012 | 0.005 | 0.013 |
Lach, relative abundance of Lachnospirales.
Figure 7Microbiota network of LT group. Choose the top 30 microbiota taxon of LT group and detect correlations of them (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient>0.6, adjusted P<0.05). The red lines represent a positive correlation, and the blue lines represent negative correlation.