Literature DB >> 35399901

Efficacy of ultra-high-resolution computed tomographic angiography for postoperative evaluation of intracranial aneurysm after clipping surgery: A case report.

Shingo Kayano1, Akira Ito2, Toshiki Endo2, Hitoshi Nemoto1, Kazuki Shimada1, Kuniyasu Niizuma2,3,4, Teiji Tominaga2.   

Abstract

Background: Following clipping surgery for intracranial aneurysm, computed tomography angiography (CTA) is often used to confirm complete aneurysm obliteration. However, artifacts from the titanium clips usually degrade the images around them. The ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) system recently became available in clinical practice. Here, we report a case in which CTA using the UHR-CT system successfully pointed out a small aneurysmal remnant after the clipping surgery, which was validated by digital subtraction angiography. Case Description: A patient underwent clipping surgery for an unruptured aneurysm using two titanium alloy clips. CTA using the UHR-CT system demonstrated a small remnant aneurysm. Digital subtraction angiography confirmed the minor remnant. The UHR-CTA images were comparable to three-dimensional reconstructed images from the rotational angiography.
Conclusion: We propose that UHR-CTA is a reliable postoperative assessment method for intracranial clipping surgeries. Copyright:
© 2022 Surgical Neurology International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral aneurysm; Computed tomography angiography; Digital subtraction angiography; Ultra-high-resolution computed tomography

Year:  2022        PMID: 35399901      PMCID: PMC8986654          DOI: 10.25259/SNI_1190_2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol Int        ISSN: 2152-7806


INTRODUCTION

Clipping surgery is one of the established treatments for intracranial aneurysms.[3] Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has long been considered the gold standard for examining cerebral aneurysms.[2,6] Recently, computed tomography angiography (CTA) has more frequently been used to evaluate aneurysms, especially after clipping surgeries.[1] However, aneurysmal clips induce metal artifacts in CTA, which hinder precise evaluations of aneurysms.[4,6] The ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) system recently became available, and we recently reported usefulness of UHR-CT in the detection of the subcallosal artery.[5] UHR-CT theoretically reduces metal artifacts. Here, we report a case of the successful detection of a minor remnant of an aneurysm using UHR-CTA after clipping surgery.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A patient underwent clipping surgery for an unruptured aneurysm. Two titanium alloy clips (Sugita Aneurysm Clip; Mizuho, Tokyo, Japan) were used for obliteration of the aneurysm. He/she underwent CTA using the UHR-CT system (Aquilion Precision; Canon Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan) after surgery [Figure 1a]. The scanning protocol was same as previously reported (supplementary manuscript).[5] The obtained image demonstrated a small bulge, indicating a possible remnant aneurysm. DSA using a biplane angiography system with flat-panel detectors (Infinix Celeve-I INFX8000V, Canon Medical Systems) confirmed the minor rem€nant. Three-dimensional reconstructed images from the rotational angiography were comparable to the UHR-CTA images [Figures 1b-e]. A CTA image obtained on conventional CT system (Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition; Canon Medical Systems) was much less optimal to detect the remnant [Figure 1].
Figure 1:

Small recurrent aneurysm after the clipping surgery. The volume rendering image on (a and d) ultra-high-resolution computed tomographic angiography (UHR-CTA) is comparable to (b and e) on digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and (c and f) on conventional CTA. The image from conventional CTA had considerably less optimal quality. The aneurysmal clips were removed manually in (d, e and f). Note that UHR-CTA and DSA were performed in 2020, whereas conventional CTA was performed in 2019. Arrows in (d and e) indicate small remnant of the aneurysm after clipping surgery.

Small recurrent aneurysm after the clipping surgery. The volume rendering image on (a and d) ultra-high-resolution computed tomographic angiography (UHR-CTA) is comparable to (b and e) on digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and (c and f) on conventional CTA. The image from conventional CTA had considerably less optimal quality. The aneurysmal clips were removed manually in (d, e and f). Note that UHR-CTA and DSA were performed in 2020, whereas conventional CTA was performed in 2019. Arrows in (d and e) indicate small remnant of the aneurysm after clipping surgery.

Phantom study

Using the same scanning parameters for UHR-CTA and conventional CTA, we performed the phantom studies (supplementary manuscript). The in vitro study demonstrated that the artifacts from the aneurysmal clip were less intense the image obtained in UHR-CT [Figure 2a] than that in conventional CT [Figure 2b].
Figure 2:

In vitro study comparing ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) and conventional CT. The artifacts from the aneurysmal clip were suppressed in (a) UHR-CT, whereas it was more intense in (b) conventional CT.

In vitro study comparing ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) and conventional CT. The artifacts from the aneurysmal clip were suppressed in (a) UHR-CT, whereas it was more intense in (b) conventional CT.

DISCUSSION

This is the first report demonstrating the efficacy of UHRCTA in evaluating aneurysms after clipping surgery, which successfully suppressed the artifacts from the clips. The UHR-CT system has two distinct features that explain the quality improvement. First is the high spatial resolution. UHR-CT can provide images with a matrix of 1024 × 1024 and 0.25 mm section thickness,[7] which is twice the capabilities of conventional CT. Second is the high-effective energy of the X-rays. Our results, measured using the noncontact-type X-ray analyzer, showed the effective X-ray energy at 120 kV as 55.9 keV and 48.8 keV in the UHR-CT and conventional CT used at our institute, respectively (unpublished data). A recent meta-analysis indicated that CTA was not as accurate as DSA in ruling out postclipping remnant aneurysms;[6] the reason is metal artifacts from titanium clips, which always matter in postoperative evaluations.[4] The current case report highlights that UHR-CTA is comparable with DSA in evaluating intracranial aneurysms even after the titanium clips were placed.
  7 in total

1.  Postoperative three-dimensional CT angiography after cerebral aneurysm clipping with titanium clips: detection with single detector CT. Comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  I Sakuma; N Tomura; H Kinouchi; S Takahashi; T Otani; J Watarai; K Mizoi
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Contrast-enhanced angiographic computed tomography for detection of aneurysm remnants after clipping: a comparison with digital subtraction angiography in 112 clipped aneurysms.

Authors:  Philipp Gölitz; Tobias Struffert; Oliver Ganslandt; Stefan Lang; Frauke Knossalla; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Timothy J Kaufmann; John Huston; Jay N Mandrekar; Cathy D Schleck; Kent R Thielen; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography for Postclipping Aneurysm Obliteration Detection.

Authors:  Matthew Uricchio; Saksham Gupta; Nicholas Jakowenko; Marissa Levito; Nguyen Vu; Joanne Doucette; Aaron Liew; Stefania Papatheodorou; Ayaz M Khawaja; Linda S Aglio; Mohammad Ali Aziz-Sultan; Hasan Zaidi; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.

Authors:  Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 3-9       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Subjective and objective comparisons of image quality between ultra-high-resolution CT and conventional area detector CT in phantoms and cadaveric human lungs.

Authors:  Masahiro Yanagawa; Akinori Hata; Osamu Honda; Noriko Kikuchi; Tomo Miyata; Ayumi Uranishi; Shinsuke Tsukagoshi; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Comparison between ultra-high-resolution computed tomographic angiography and conventional computed tomographic angiography in the visualization of the subcallosal artery.

Authors:  Yoshimichi Sato; Toshiki Endo; Shingo Kayano; Hitoshi Nemoto; Kazuki Shimada; Akira Ito; Hidenori Endo; Shunji Mugikura; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-10-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.