| Literature DB >> 35399838 |
Chang Dou1, Lihang Cui1, Cuixia Li1.
Abstract
Despite the current rapid growth of organic agriculture, the problem of low demand for organic agricultural products persists in China, and the consumption space warrants improvement. Exploring consumers' preferences for organic agricultural products and increasing their purchase intentions are of utmost significance to promote organic agricultural production. Thus, this study takes organic milk, which accounts for 58% of China's organic processed agricultural products in sales, as the research object, and uses a choice experiment to investigate the influence of consumers on the purchase intention of organic milk under the intervention of environmental protection information and quality and safety information. The main research results revealed that both environmental protection information and quality and safety information have significantly increased consumers' willingness to purchase and that quality and safety information has increased more than environmental protection information.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35399838 PMCID: PMC8989582 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1256796
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1The influence mechanism of information intervention on the purchase intention of organic agricultural products.
Experimental items, experimental groups, and information intervention.
| Experimental project | The first project experiment | The second project experiment | The third project experiment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Information intervention content | No | Environmental protection information | Quality and safety information | No | Environmental protection information | No | Quality and safety information |
| Number of subjects | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Remark |
|
|
| ||||
Attributes and levels of organic milk.
| Attributes | Levels | Attribute description |
|---|---|---|
| Organic certification mark | Chinese organic certification mark | Organic certification mark displayed on organic milk packaging |
| Foreign organic certification mark | ||
| Brand location | Chinese brand | Refers to the place where the brand of organic milk belongs to |
| Foreign brand | ||
| Origin of raw milk | China | Refers to where the raw milk of organic milk belongs to |
| Foreign | ||
| Price(yuan/250 ml) | 3.80 | Sales price of organic milk |
| 5.32 | ||
| 7.45 | ||
| 10.43 | ||
| 14.6 |
Examples of selection sets.
| Attributes |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic certification mark | Foreign organic certification mark | Chinese organic certification mark | No choice |
| Brand location | Chinese brand | Foreign brand | |
| Origin of raw milk | China | Foreign | |
| Price | 14.6 yuan/250 ml | 10.43yuan/250 ml | |
| Your choice | □ | □ | □ |
Variable representation and assignment.
| Variables | Variable representation | Variable assignment |
|---|---|---|
| Organic certification mark | Certf | Foreign organic certification mark = 1; Chinese organic certification mark = 0 |
| Brand location | Brand | Foreign brand = 1; Chinese brand = 0 |
| Origin of raw milk | Origin | Foreign = 1; China = 0 |
| Price | Price | Price = 3.80¥/250 ml; 5.32¥/250 ml; 7.45¥/250 ml; 10.43¥/250 ml; 14.6¥/250 ml |
| Gender | Gen | female = 1; male = 0 |
| Age | Age | (0,18] = 1; (18, 25] = 2; (25, 35] = 3; (35, 50] = 4; (50, 60] = 5; (60, +∞) = 6 |
| Education | Edu | Elementary school and below = 1; |
| Personal monthly income(yuan) | Income | (0, 2000] = 1; (2000, 4000] = 2; (4000, 6000] = 3; (6000, 8000] = 4; (8000, 10000] = 5; (10000, +∞] = 6 |
| Elderly people over 60 years old in the family | n_elder | yes = 1; no = 0 |
| Children over 1 year old in the family | n_child | yes = 1; no = 0 |
| Trust in organic milk | Trust | “Completely distrusted” = 1, “relatively distrusted = 2”, “general trust = 3”, “relatively trusted = 4” and “full trust = 5” |
| The experience of paying attention to organic milk | Attention | yes = 1; no = 0 |
Basic characteristics of samples of each project in the choice experiment.
| Variables | The first project | The second project | The third project | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group a | Group b | Group c | Group | Group | ||||||
| Average | SD | Average | SD | Average | SD | Average | SD | Average | SD | |
| Gender | 0.52 | 0.499 | 0.47 | 0.499 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.55 | 0.497 | 0.43 | 0.495 |
| Age | 3.45 | 1.32 | 3.34 | 1.04 | 2.90 | 1.77 | 3.63 | 2.10 | 3.51 | 1.48 |
| Education | 2.61 | 0.96 | 3.02 | 1.09 | 2.58 | 0.99 | 2.88 | 1.35 | 2.90 | 1.02 |
| Personal monthly income(yuan) | 2.01 | 0.89 | 2.42 | 0.97 | 2.63 | 1.03 | 2.08 | 1.11 | 2.50 | 1.42 |
| Elderly people over 60 years old in the family | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.46 |
| Children over 1 year old in the family | 0.62 | 0.49 | 0.67 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.49 |
| Trust in organic milk | 3.87 | 1.01 | 3.50 | 0.95 | 3.69 | 0.89 | 3.36 | 1.20 | 3.71 | 1.08 |
| The experience of paying attention to organic milk | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.25 | 0.43 | 0.20 | 0.4 | 0.18 | 0.38 |
Note. SD stands for “standard deviation”.
Logit estimation results of random parameters of the influence of environmental protection information and quality and safety information on purchase intention.
| Variables | Control group | Test group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No intervention (group | Environmental protection information intervention (group | Quality and safety information intervention (group | |
| Certf | 0.7871 | 1.1366 | 1.1959 |
| Brand | 0.2286 | 0.2609 | 0.5675 |
| Origin | 0.2331 | 0.2850 | 0.3217 |
| Price | −0.0870 | −0.0780 | −0.0630 |
| Gen | 0.2836 (0.2006) | 0.5652 | 0.6525 |
| Age | −0.2308 (0.0925) | −0.0114 | −0.0692 |
| Edu | 0.0259 (0.1390) | 0.2314 | 0.1409 |
| Income | 0.5879 | 0.4695 | 0.5288 |
| n_elder | 0.0644 (0.1824) | 0.0454 | 0.0902 (0.1702) |
| n_child | 0.0418 (0.1716) | 0.0046 (0.1610) | 0.0774 (0.1645) |
| Trust | 0.1679 | 0.1373 | 0.0981 |
| Attention | 0.2415 (0.0685) | 0.0847 (0.0633) | 0.2445 |
| Log likelihood | −1835 | −1790 | −1846 |
Note. , , and indicate significance at levels of 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. The numbers in parentheses indicate standard errors.
Empirical results of the influence of information intervention on purchase intention in the same crowd.
| Variable | The second project experiment | The third project experiment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Test group | Control group | Test group | |
| No intervention (group d) | Environmental protection information intervention (group e) | No intervention (group f) | Quality and safety information intervention (group g) | |
| Certf | 1.0932 | 1.0966 | 1.0470 | 1.3020 |
| Brand | 0.1706 (0.2490) | 0.1952 | 0.1287 (0.4155) | 0.1388 |
| Origin | 0.3499 | 0.3990 | 0.3072 | 0.3635 |
| Price | −0.2161 | −0.2076 | −0.1794 | −0.1373 |
| Gen | 0.0594 (0.2110) | 0.0201 (0.2154) | 0.0165 | 0.0530 (0.2307) |
| Age | −0.0480 (0.2813) | −0.0216 (0.2765) | −0.0414 (0.2760) | −0.0510 (0.2826) |
| Edu | 0.1666 (0.2852) | 0.1957 (0.2883) | 0.0743 | 0.0786 |
| Income | 0.4521 | 0.4103 | 0.4395 | 0.4499 |
| n_elder | 0.0386 (0.1373) | 0.2537 (0.1328) | 0.0297 (0.1339) | 0.1400 (0.1285) |
| n_child | 0.1574 (0.1190) | −0.0201 (0.1223) | 0.0903 (0.1173) | 0.1196 (0.1130) |
| Trust | 0.4430 | 0.5477 | 0.4684 | 0.4994 |
| Attention | 0.0118 (0.1716) | 0.0246 (0.1610) | 0.0074 (0.1645) | 0.0064 (0.1636) |
| Log likelihood | −1763 | −1811 | −1802 | −1732 |
Note. , , and indicate significance at levels of 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. The numbers in parentheses indicate standard errors.