Katherine A Knutson1, Wei Pan1. 1. Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Abstract
Background: Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many genetic variants associated with increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). These susceptibility loci may effect AD indirectly through a combination of physiological brain changes. Many of these neuropathologic features are detectable via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: In this study, we examine the effects of such brain imaging derived phenotypes (IDPs) with genetic etiology on AD, using and comparing the following methods: two-sample Mendelian randomization (2SMR), generalized summary statistics based Mendelian randomization (GSMR), transcriptome wide association studies (TWAS) and the adaptive sum of powered score (aSPU) test. These methods do not require individual-level genotypic and phenotypic data but instead can rely only on an external reference panel and GWAS summary statistics. Results: Using publicly available GWAS datasets from the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP) and UK Biobank's (UKBB) brain imaging initiatives, we identify 35 IDPs possibly associated with AD, many of which have well established or biologically plausible links to the characteristic cognitive impairments of this neurodegenerative disease. Conclusions: Our results highlight the increased power for detecting genetic associations achieved by multiple correlated SNP-based methods, i.e., aSPU, GSMR and TWAS, over MR methods based on independent SNPs (as instrumental variables).
Background: Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many genetic variants associated with increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). These susceptibility loci may effect AD indirectly through a combination of physiological brain changes. Many of these neuropathologic features are detectable via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: In this study, we examine the effects of such brain imaging derived phenotypes (IDPs) with genetic etiology on AD, using and comparing the following methods: two-sample Mendelian randomization (2SMR), generalized summary statistics based Mendelian randomization (GSMR), transcriptome wide association studies (TWAS) and the adaptive sum of powered score (aSPU) test. These methods do not require individual-level genotypic and phenotypic data but instead can rely only on an external reference panel and GWAS summary statistics. Results: Using publicly available GWAS datasets from the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP) and UK Biobank's (UKBB) brain imaging initiatives, we identify 35 IDPs possibly associated with AD, many of which have well established or biologically plausible links to the characteristic cognitive impairments of this neurodegenerative disease. Conclusions: Our results highlight the increased power for detecting genetic associations achieved by multiple correlated SNP-based methods, i.e., aSPU, GSMR and TWAS, over MR methods based on independent SNPs (as instrumental variables).
Entities:
Keywords:
MRI; Mendelian randomization; SPU tests; Sum test; TWAS; aSPU test
Authors: Michael Wainberg; Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong; Nicholas Mancuso; Alvaro N Barbeira; David A Knowles; David Golan; Raili Ermel; Arno Ruusalepp; Thomas Quertermous; Ke Hao; Johan L M Björkegren; Hae Kyung Im; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Manuel A Rivas; Anshul Kundaje Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Adam M Brickman; Irene B Meier; Mayuresh S Korgaonkar; Frank A Provenzano; Stuart M Grieve; Karen L Siedlecki; Ben T Wasserman; Leanne M Williams; Molly E Zimmerman Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Zhihong Zhu; Zhili Zheng; Futao Zhang; Yang Wu; Maciej Trzaskowski; Robert Maier; Matthew R Robinson; John J McGrath; Peter M Visscher; Naomi R Wray; Jian Yang Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Alvaro N Barbeira; Milton Pividori; Jiamao Zheng; Heather E Wheeler; Dan L Nicolae; Hae Kyung Im Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 5.917