| Literature DB >> 35399750 |
Maria Gayatri1, Dian Kristiani Irawaty1.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has spread rapidly in many countries. This pandemic has led to short-term as well as long-term psychosocial and mental health implications for all family members. The magnitude of family resilience is determined by many vulnerability factors like developmental age, educational status, preexisting mental health condition, being economically underprivileged or being quarantined due to infection or fear of infection.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; family; pandemic; resilience; wellbeing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35399750 PMCID: PMC8980846 DOI: 10.1177/10664807211023875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fam J Alex Va ISSN: 1066-4807
Figure 1.Study inclusion.
Study Characteristics and Main Findings.
| Source | Country | No. of Participants | Age (years) | Study design | Data analysis | Key results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Canada | 155,649 children aged 0–17 years old | 1–17 years old | Action research methodology: tool format, secondary analysis, face validity | Factor analysis | Some of the most disadvantaged society, including children and families, are served by the children's welfare system. The COVID-19 pandemic worsens families' current hardship. Family with babies were more likely to face economic difficulties. |
|
| Indonesia | 365 parents of Indonesian students | From less than 40 to more than 56 years old | Survey with questionnaire | Median test, Kruskal–Wallis, correlational test | Family resilience was measured based on three domains: family belief system (meaning-making, positive view, transcendence), pattern of family organization (flexibility, connectedness, social resources), and communication (clarity, emotional disclosure, collaborative problem-solving). |
|
| The United States | 1,996 child welfare workers | Average: 41.44 years, | Cross-sectional design via online survey | Correlation, independent sample | The levels of distress among child welfare workers were influenced by sexual orientation, physical health status, mental health status, relationship status, supervision status, and financial stability. |
|
| United States, Israel, and other countries (United Kingdom, Canada, Brazil, Germany, Ireland, etc.) | 3,042 participants (healthcare providers and nonhealthcare providers) | 18–79 years | Cross-sectional via online survey | Linear regression and binary logistic regression | Respondents were more distress if family infected by COVID-19, unintentionally infected others, and suffer from COVID-19 themselves. Higher resilience was related with lower worries about COVID-19, lower anxiety, and lower depression. |
|
| Israel | 1,346 respondents | From 18 years to more than 71 years | Online survey Through internet panel company and social media | Path analysis/Amos Structural equation modeling | Higher individual resilience, higher wellbeing, and older age are associated with lower sense of danger and distress symptoms. Greater economic difficulties, larger sizes of community, lower family income are associated with higher sense of danger and distress symptoms. High level of resilience means low level of distress. |
|
| The United States | 76 individuals | 70–97 years | Interview through telephone | Pearson's correlation and thematic content analysis | Adaptive coping that emerged among older adults are staying busy, seeking social support, having positive mindset. |
|
| The United States | 2,196 high school students | High school grade 9, 10, 11, 12 | Survey | Multivariate regression | Resilience among students related to adults on whom they depend for care. Mental health among adolescents associated with their parents' functioning. |
|
| China | 845 participants/family members of health care workers | Median: 37 years | Online-based cross-sectional | Multivariate logistic regression | The outbreak has caused mental health problems such as stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms among family members of health care workers. Time spent thinking about COVID-19 and time spent with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients were risk factors of psychological impact such as anxiety and depression. Moreover, protective equipment used by health care workers was less likely caused anxiety syndrome for the family of health care workers. |